Rotational grazing to restore degraded pastures (阿富汗)

Ploni ba navbat charonidani mol ba khotiri behbudi charogoh

描述

A plan for rotational grazing has been developed to control pasture use and prevent overgrazing of rehabilitated pastures.

Livestock keeping is one of the key livelihood strategies in rural Rustaq, in addition to cultivation of cereals. Families rely on their livestock not only for consumption of meat from cattle, goats and sheep, and dairy products such as milk and sour milk, but also as means of transportation (donkeys), labour in agriculture (oxen, donkeys) and as a source of income through sales. Naturally, every family strives to increase their household’s livestock as much as they can, which increases the pressure on the local pastures - leading to extensive overgrazing. The pastures in Jawaz Khana and Sari Joy are characterized by poor vegetation cover, low carrying capacity and severe erosion with deep rills clearly visible. Heavy rains in spring and autumn wash off the topsoil on pastures, resulting in heavy erosion, landslides and gully formation. These severely degraded pastures continue to be used though "open access" - without any management schemes or regulations in place. Some pastures that are not suitable for grazing have been converted to arable lands and tree plantations. The quantity and quality of livestock fodder is insufficient for all the livestock, and this affects animal health.

Plans for rotational grazing were prepared for the communities in Sari Joy and Jawaz Khana to organize the use of local pastures and prevent their further degradation. Rotational grazing plans regulate the frequency and intensity of livestock grazing on the pastures. The area is seeded with alfalfa to improve the fodder stock and enhance the quality of the pasture. For up to three years the seeded area is closed to grazing, during which period the community is provided with stocks of hay and straw to feed their livestock as an alternative. After the end of the closure period, the grazing area is divided into 6-7 sections (paddocks) depending on the area of the pasture. The livestock graze the first paddock for 7 days and move to the next paddock. Each paddock is grazed for the period of 7 days during April and May. From the month of May the grazing area is closed for resting. The livestock move to the summer pastures for the rest of the summer months.

The community is key in preparing the grazing plans and identifying the pastures where these plans will be applied, as well as the conditions which are part of it, such as the frequency of the grazing period. Frequent meetings need to be held with the community livestock holders to explain the purpose of the rotational grazing and how it can be beneficial in pasture improvement. The Natural Resources Management Committee and the technical staff of the Livelihood Improvement Project (LIPT) are in charge of engaging the local pasture users to meet their needs and consider their views accordingly.

The actual implementation of the rotational grazing plans is difficult to assess for the time being. The grazing area is not fully restored and the fodder stock remains low. Many land users do not fully understand the concept behind the rotational grazing plans or their purpose. In an area where there is a severe shortage of livestock fodder and very limited grazing land, accepting and following these plans will require more time and additional support in terms of awareness-raising and support feeding of the livestock during the exclusion period. The villagers have some doubts about the costs and benefits of grazing and rotation. They have no full understanding of the benefits of the rotational grazing for their household and are likely to be not ready to adhere to such schemes.

Women are part of the livestock management system, and are in charge of feeding and taking care of the livestock. However, they are not aware about the plans for rotational grazing in their village and how are these plans are applied in practice.

地点

地点: Sari Joy and Jawaz Khana Villages, Takhar Province, Rustaq District, 阿富汗

分析的技术场所数量: 2-10个场所

选定地点的地理参考
  • 69.91915, 37.1094

技术传播: 均匀地分布在一个区域 (approx. 0.1-1 平方千米)

实施日期: 2015; 不到10年前(最近)

介绍类型

技术分类

主要目的
  • 改良生产
  • 减少、预防、恢复土地退化
  • 保护生态系统
  • 结合其他技术保护流域/下游区域
  • 保持/提高生物多样性
  • 降低灾害风险
  • 适应气候变化/极端天气及其影响
  • 减缓气候变化及其影响
  • 创造有益的经济影响
  • 创造有益的社会影响
土地利用

  • 牧场 - 粗放式放牧场: 半游牧/游牧
    集约放牧/饲料生产: 改良牧场
    主要动物种类及产品: Cow, Sheep, Goat. Alfalfa
供水
  • 雨养
  • 混合雨水灌溉
  • 充分灌溉

每年的生长季节数: 1
该技术实施前的土地利用: Some areas under the Technology are former croplands, which have been completely degraded and no longer suitable for crop cultivation.
牲畜密度: 不适用
土地退化相关的目的
  • 防止土地退化
  • 减少土地退化
  • 修复/恢复严重退化的土地
  • 适应土地退化
  • 不适用
解决的退化问题
  • 土壤水蚀 - Wt:表土流失/地表侵蚀
  • 土壤风蚀 - Et:表土流失
  • 物理性土壤退化 - Pc:压实
  • 生物性退化 - Bc:植被覆盖的减少, Bq:数量/生物量减少
  • 其它 -
SLM组
  • 畜牧业和牧场管理
SLM措施
  • 管理措施 - M2:改变管理/强度级别

技术图纸

技术规范
作者:LIPT
After the end of the exclusion period the grazing area is divided into 6-7 sections (paddocks) depending on the area of the pasture. The livestock graze the first paddock for 7 days and move to the next paddock after 7 days. Each paddock is grazed for the period of 7 days during April and May. From the month of May the grazing area is closed for resting. The livestock move to the summer pastures for the rest of the summer months.

技术建立与维护:活动、投入和费用

投入和成本的计算
  • 计算的成本为:每个技术区域 (尺寸和面积单位:1 ha
  • 成本计算使用的货币:美元
  • 汇率(换算为美元):1 美元 = 67.0
  • 雇用劳工的每日平均工资成本:5.2-5.3 USD
影响成本的最重要因素
Due to the remoteness of the villages where the technology has been implemented, all the inputs for establishment, such as agricultural equipment, plant material, fertilizers, etc., are purchased in Rustaq town. The expenses for traveling and delivering the inputs affect the establishment costs.
技术建立活动
  1. Selection of the pasture area and awareness raising among people (时间/频率: Fall)
  2. Leveling of the land (时间/频率: Fall)
  3. Sowing alfalfa seed (时间/频率: Spring)
  4. Site under quarantine (时间/频率: Three years)
  5. Preparation of the grazing plan and community meetings (时间/频率: Fall)
  6. Protection of the site during quarantine (时间/频率: Three years)
技术建立的投入和成本 (per 1 ha)
对投入进行具体说明 单位 数量 单位成本 (美元) 每项投入的总成本 (美元) 土地使用者承担的成本%
劳动力
Leveling the land with a rake person-day 150.0 5.3 795.0 71.0
Sowing alfalfa person-day 5.0 5.3 26.5 71.0
Preparation of grazing plan person-day 2.0 9.0 18.0
Protection of the site year 1.0 447.0 447.0 100.0
设备
Shovel piece 1.0 3.8 3.8 100.0
Rope Meter 50.0 0.15 7.5 100.0
Rake piece 1.0 3.0 3.0 100.0
植物材料
Alfalfa seed kg 17.5 0.42 7.35
肥料和杀菌剂
DAP kg 125.0 0.9 112.5
Urea kg 125.0 0.45 56.25
技术建立所需总成本 1'476.9
技术维护活动
  1. Community agrees to leave the pasture for resting/ exclusion (时间/频率: Three years)
  2. Rotational grazing (时间/频率: Spring/week/grazing plot)
  3. Reseeding alfalfa (时间/频率: After 5 years)
  4. Protection of the site (时间/频率: Three years)
技术维护的投入和成本 (per 1 ha)
对投入进行具体说明 单位 数量 单位成本 (美元) 每项投入的总成本 (美元) 土地使用者承担的成本%
劳动力
Reseeding alfalfa person day 5.0 5.3 26.5 100.0
Protection during exclusion year 2.0 447.0 894.0 100.0
植物材料
Alfalfa seed kg 17.5 0.42 7.35 100.0
技术维护所需总成本 927.85

自然环境

年平均降雨量
  • < 250毫米
  • 251-500毫米
  • 501-750毫米
  • 751-1,000毫米
  • 1,001-1,500毫米
  • 1,501-2,000毫米
  • 2,001-3,000毫米
  • 3,001-4,000毫米
  • > 4,000毫米
农业气候带
  • 潮湿的
  • 半湿润
  • 半干旱
  • 干旱
关于气候的规范
Average annual precipitation for the area was calculated with 580 mm, with minimum in dry years (2000 and 2001) of 270 mm and maximum in wet years (2009/2010) of 830 mm. The absolute maximum rainfall was calculated for 1986 with 1024 mm. The data series covers the period from 1979 to 2014.
斜坡
  • 水平(0-2%)
  • 缓降(3-5%)
  • 平缓(6-10%)
  • 滚坡(11-15%)
  • 崎岖(16-30%)
  • 陡峭(31-60%)
  • 非常陡峭(>60%)
地形
  • 高原/平原
  • 山脊
  • 山坡
  • 山地斜坡
  • 麓坡
  • 谷底
海拔
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
......应用的技术
  • 凸形情况
  • 凹陷情况
  • 不相关
土壤深度
  • 非常浅(0-20厘米)
  • 浅(21-50厘米)
  • 中等深度(51-80厘米)
  • 深(81-120厘米)
  • 非常深(> 120厘米)
土壤质地(表土)
  • 粗粒/轻(砂质)
  • 中粒(壤土、粉土)
  • 细粒/重质(粘土)
土壤质地(地表以下>20厘米)
  • 粗粒/轻(砂质)
  • 中粒(壤土、粉土)
  • 细粒/重质(粘土)
表土有机质含量
  • 高(>3%)
  • 中(1-3%)
  • 低(<1%)
地下水位
  • 表面上
  • < 5米
  • 5-50米
  • > 50米
地表水的可用性
  • 过量
  • 中等
  • 匮乏/没有
水质(未处理)
  • 良好饮用水
  • 不良饮用水(需要处理)
  • 仅供农业使用(灌溉)
  • 不可用
盐度是个问题吗?

洪水发生
物种多样性
  • 中等
栖息地多样性
  • 中等

应用该技术的土地使用者的特征

市场定位
  • 生计(自给)
  • 混合(生计/商业
  • 商业/市场
非农收入
  • 低于全部收入的10%
  • 收入的10-50%
  • > 收入的50%
相对财富水平
  • 非常贫瘠
  • 贫瘠
  • 平均水平
  • 丰富
  • 非常丰富
机械化水平
  • 手工作业
  • 畜力牵引
  • 机械化/电动
定栖或游牧
  • 定栖的
  • 半游牧的
  • 游牧的
个人或集体
  • 个人/家庭
  • 团体/社区
  • 合作社
  • 员工(公司、政府)
性别
  • 女人
  • 男人
年龄
  • 儿童
  • 青年人
  • 中年人
  • 老年人
每户使用面积
  • < 0.5 公顷
  • 0.5-1 公顷
  • 1-2 公顷
  • 2-5公顷
  • 5-15公顷
  • 15-50公顷
  • 50-100公顷
  • 100-500公顷
  • 500-1,000公顷
  • 1,000-10,000公顷
  • > 10,000公顷
规模
  • 小规模的
  • 中等规模的
  • 大规模的
土地所有权
  • 公司
  • 社区/村庄
  • 团体
  • 个人,未命名
  • 个人,有命名
土地使用权
  • 自由进入(无组织)
  • 社区(有组织)
  • 租赁
  • 个人
用水权
  • 自由进入(无组织)
  • 社区(有组织)
  • 租赁
  • 个人
进入服务和基础设施的通道
健康

贫瘠
x
教育

贫瘠
x
技术援助

贫瘠
x
就业(例如非农)

贫瘠
x
市场

贫瘠
x
能源

贫瘠
x
道路和交通

贫瘠
x
饮用水和卫生设施

贫瘠
x
金融服务

贫瘠
x

影响

社会经济影响
作物生产
降低
x
增加

饲料生产
降低
x
增加

畜牧生产
降低
x
增加

木材生产
降低
x
增加

非木材林业生产
降低
x
增加

产品多样性
降低
x
增加

生产区域(耕种/使用中的新土地)
降低
x
增加

社会文化影响
生态影响
地表径流
增加
x
降低

土壤流失
增加
x
降低

植被覆盖层
降低
x
增加

场外影响
下游洪水(不希望)
增加
x
减少

下游淤积
增加
x
降低

缓冲/过滤能力(按土壤、植被、湿地划分)
减少
x
改良

成本效益分析

与技术建立成本相比的效益
短期回报
非常消极
x
非常积极

与技术维护成本相比的效益
短期回报
非常消极
x
非常积极

SLM implementers from three villages were asked to jointly discuss and rate the SLM technologies short term (1-3 years) and long-term (10 years) return. As most of the technologies have only been implemented 1-2 years ago, it is too early to compare benefits to maintenance costs. Farmers have little experience so far on the actual benefits of the SLM technologies. The ratings are mostly based on expected benefits and not on actual benefits.

气候变化

气候有关的极端情况(灾害)
局地暴雨

非常不好
x
非常好
干旱

非常不好
x
非常好

采用和适应

采用该技术的地区内土地使用者的百分比
  • 单例/实验
  • 1-10%
  • 10-50%
  • 大于 50%
在所有采用这种技术的人当中,有多少人在没有获得物质奖励的情况下采用了这种技术?
  • 0-10%
  • 10-50%
  • 50-90%
  • 90-100%
户数和/或覆盖面积
6 ha
最近是否对该技术进行了修改以适应不断变化的条件?
什么样的变化条件?
  • 气候变化/极端气候
  • 不断变化的市场
  • 劳动力可用性(例如,由于迁移)

结论和吸取的教训

长处: 土地使用者的观点
长处: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点
  • If implemented according to the plan and the pasture area is allowed to rest, the quality and quantity of the fodder will be enhanced.
弱点/缺点/风险: 土地使用者的观点如何克服
弱点/缺点/风险: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点如何克服
  • The land users have no full knowledge about the plans for rotational grazing and how they should be applied Increase awareness raising among the land users

参考文献

编制者
  • Bettina Wolfgramm
Editors
  • MIAJAN MAROOFI
  • Hekmatullah Sharifzai
  • Roziya Kirgizbekova
  • Aslam Qadamov
审查者
  • William Critchley
实施日期: Oct. 27, 2016
上次更新: Nov. 1, 2021
资源人
WOCAT数据库中的完整描述
链接的SLM数据
文件编制者
机构 项目
主要参考文献
  • Guidelines for Focus Groups Discussions:
  • Methods section of the Rustaq NRM study:
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International