1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称（如相关）

Kathmandu University (KU) - 尼泊尔

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称（如相关）

Sarada Batase Village Development Committee (Sarada Batase VDC) - 尼泊尔

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

（现场）数据是什么时候汇编的？:

02/01/2013

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

是

2.2 该方法的详细说明

该方法的详细说明:

Aims / objectives: the village always lacked drinking water. People had to waste their extra time and effort to fetch water from rivers. this approach was born of combating the difficulty, thus to provide drinking water supply to their respective houses. This was the main aim of approach.

Methods: firstly, the experts from Bagmati Watershed Project measured. Their method was to observe and calculate directly with field visits. Then, project was completed with help of villagers. The maintenance was done by villagers themselves. The sources of water are lovated at the bank of river Policing in Lalitpur district and one at river Ghatte(Ghatte Khola) of ward number 2.

Stages of implementation: There are several stages of implementation:
stage 1: Expers from Bagmati Watershed Project firstly explore and measure the sources.
stage 2: Along with villagers, experts then planned and agreed upon the technology.
stage 3: Project then build the supply with labor donation from villagers themselves.
stage 4: Training was given to the villagers through meetings
stage 5: Maintenance is done by villagers themselves.

Role of stakeholders: Stakeholders ensured availability of resources, specified resources and their allocation. They were the pillars of success of this project as project went smoothly and successfully.

2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点

2.6 该方法的开始和终止日期

2.7 方法的类型

• 基于项目/方案

2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标

The Approach focused mainly on other activities than SLM (supply of water)

To provide convenient drinking water for all houses

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: Lack of proper and convenient drinking water

2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件

3.1 该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责

3.2 当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段

	当地土地使用者/当地社区的参与	指定参与人员并描述活动
启动/动机	互动
计划	互动
实施	外部支持
监测/评估	自我动员
Research	无

3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策

具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:

• 主要是SLM专家，咨询土地使用者之后

解释:

initial research and use of technology was all done by the project itself.

Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by mainly by SLM specialists with consultation of land users. The leading role was of experts to decide or propose or explain the method to the villagers who then agreed.

4.1 能力建设/培训

是否为土地使用者/其他利益相关者提供培训？:

是

明确受训人员:

• 土地使用者

培训形式:

• 公开会议

涵盖的主题:

The main training villagers got was learning by participation.

4.2 咨询服务

土地使用者有权使用咨询服务吗？:

是

说明/注释:

Advisory service is quite adequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; Other projects are also contributing for supply of drinking water through new sources to unreached or insufficient supply areas.

4.3 机构强化（组织发展）

是否通过这种方法建立或加强了机构？:

• 否

4.4 监测和评估

监测和评估是该方法的一部分吗？:

是

注释:

bio-physical aspects were ad hoc monitored by other through measurements

technical aspects were ad hoc monitored by project staff through observations

socio-cultural aspects were ad hoc monitored by project staff through observations

area treated aspects were monitored by None through measurements

There were no changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation: no change in approach.

There were no changes in the Technology as a result of monitoring and evaluation

4.5 研究

研究是该方法的一部分吗?

是

明确话题:

• 生态学

提供进一步的细节，并指出是谁做的研究:

by project itself.

5.1 该方法中SLM组成部分的年度预算

注释（例如主要的资助来源/主要捐助者）:

Approach costs were met by the following donors: government (50,000): 71.45%; local government (district, county, municipality, village etc) (15,000): 21.42%; local community / land user(s) (5,000): 7.13%

5.2 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援

土地使用者是否获得实施该技术的财政/物质支持？:

是

5.3 对特定投入的补贴（包括劳动力）

• 基建

如果土地使用者的劳动力是一项重要的投入，那么是不是:

• 自愿

注释:

They provided labour service to build their own taps.

5.4 信用

是否根据SLM活动的方法给予信用值？:

是

6.1 方法的影响

6.2 土地使用者实施SLM的主要动机

6.3 方法活动的可持续性

土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施（无外部支持的情况下）？:

• 否

若否或不确定，请具体说明并予以注释:

They need economic and technical support for developing or extending major approach activities.

6.4 该方法的长处/优点

土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会
The approach provided easy access to drinking water.
It reduces unnecessary labor of carrying water.
Users could now concentrate efficiently on agriculture.
The water could be used for other purpose as well cooking, cleaning, agriculture, etc.

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
Main advantage is that approach reduced labor and saved effort and time of land users. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: A major lesson of this approach is self dependence. To enhance the result of this approach, the villagers must have acquired some technical and management knowledge. This knowledge will be helpful to continue getting results and to extend it. it will also e helpful and motivate the start of newer approaches.)
It made villagers aware of how to use locally available resources for greater productivity.
The approach helped villagers learn to tackle challenges to manage project unitedly.

6.5 该方法的弱点/缺点以及克服它们的方法

土地使用者认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
Need of constant repairing of pipes
water cannot be supplied to each of the houses.	The villagers can make shifts of people going for cleaning/surveillance of the sources. The sources should cover properly.

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
Any technological achievement lead to conflict between those who are benefited and those not.	there should be a supreme body to manage these resources and to make regulation,rules and decision.Since this approach involves everyone, these can be conflicts and arguments frequently. Like if only one tap is available for group of houses/families, there can be conflicts. therefore, under united efforts of villagers, water use rights and regulations must e passed.
Lack of supreme body to manage the water supply system
The source was not properly covered. It was prone to pollution.

7.1 方法/信息来源

7.2 参考可用出版物

标题、作者、年份、ISBN:

Google maps, Google

可以从哪里获得?成本如何?

http://www.google.com