1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称（如相关）

Potchefstroom Universiteit vir CHO (Potchefstroom Universiteit vir CHO) - 南非

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

是

1.4 SLM技术问卷的参考

2.1 该方法的简要说明

Government funded project aimed at rangeland management to enhance natural recourse management. The community being the key stake holders.

2.2 该方法的详细说明

该方法的详细说明:

Aims / objectives: The community was approached to show where the benchmarks should be erected. The whole community was informed about the project and how they would benefit from it. Benchmarks were erected by the community, thus creating jobs. Initial surveys were conducted so that later comparison in production and species composition could be made after further surveys. The rotational approach was introduced in a communal system.

2.3 该方法的照片

2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点

2.6 该方法的开始和终止日期

2.7 方法的类型

• 基于项目/方案

2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标

The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities (Cattle improvement. Veld management strategies have been learned. Survey skills learned.)

On-site technology application. Seeing is believing. Community participation. Empowerment of the community to better their own situation. Job creation, community-based natural resource management. Promoting partnerships between public, community and private sectors.

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: Degraded rangelands, thus insufficient grazing for the cattle.

2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件

3.1 该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责

3.2 当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段

	当地土地使用者/当地社区的参与	指定参与人员并描述活动
启动/动机	被动	workshops/seminars, public meetings; Training for surveys was provided.
计划	被动	orkshops/seminars; Training
实施	互动	responsibility for minor steps; Should apply the rotation.
监测/评估	互动	measurements/observations; Help with monitoring.
Research	互动	on-farm; Benchmarks was erected.

3.3 流程图（如可用）

3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策

具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:

• 主要是SLM专家，咨询土地使用者之后

解释:

land user driven (bottom-up).

Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by mainly by SLM specialists with consultation of land users. consultative. The land user did not have the knowledge.

4.1 能力建设/培训

是否为土地使用者/其他利益相关者提供培训？:

是

明确受训人员:

• 土地使用者

• SWC specialists, extensionists/trainers

培训形式:

• 农民对农民
• 示范区域
• 公开会议

涵盖的主题:

Ecological principles, NRM principals.

4.2 咨询服务

土地使用者有权使用咨询服务吗？:

是

说明/注释:

Name of method used for advisory service: Demonstration; Key elements: Benchmark sites, Learning by doing; 1) Mainly: government's existing extension system, Partly: non-governmental agency. Extension staff: mainly government employees 3) Target groups for extension: land users, technicians/SWC specialists; Activities: Public demonstrations

Advisory service is inadequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; Monitoring does not persist if some one is not doing it with them.

4.3 机构强化（组织发展）

是否通过这种方法建立或加强了机构？:

• 是，少许

具体说明机构的强化或建立程度:

• 本地

具体说明支持类型:

• 能力建设/培训

4.4 监测和评估

监测和评估是该方法的一部分吗？:

是

注释:

bio-physical aspects were regular monitored through measurements

socio-cultural aspects were ad hoc monitored through observations

economic / production aspects were ad hoc monitored through observations

area treated aspects were regular monitored through measurements

no. of land users involved aspects were regular monitored through measurements

management of Approach aspects were regular monitored through measurements

There were no changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation

4.5 研究

研究是该方法的一部分吗?

是

明确话题:

• 生态学

提供进一步的细节，并指出是谁做的研究:

Vegetation, NRM, production monitoring, soil composition, on-site application.

Research was carried out on-farm

5.1 该方法中SLM组成部分的年度预算

如果不知道准确的年度预算，请给出一个范围:

• 10,000-100,000

注释（例如主要的资助来源/主要捐助者）:

Approach costs were met by the following donors: government (national - Department of Agriculture): 80.0%; national non-government (University): 20.0%

5.2 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援

土地使用者是否获得实施该技术的财政/物质支持？:

是

5.3 对特定投入的补贴（包括劳动力）

如果土地使用者的劳动力是一项重要的投入，那么是不是:

• 以现金支付

注释:

Job creation incentive.

5.4 信用

是否根据SLM活动的方法给予信用值？:

否

6.1 方法的影响

6.3 方法活动的可持续性

土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施（无外部支持的情况下）？:

• 是

若是，请说明如何维持:

Extension officers learned from the specialists.

6.4 该方法的长处/优点

土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会
Better grazing. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Keep to the rules of rotational grazing. Keep cattle out of resting velds.)
Specialists help. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: The specialists made surveys easy. Assist in erecting.)

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
The committed ADC manager. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Keep him motivated through communication.)
LandCare. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: he buzz words were introduced and community was made aware of the environment.)
Interaction between different cultures. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Specialists and communities were introduced to one another.)

6.5 该方法的弱点/缺点以及克服它们的方法

土地使用者认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
Specialists are very remote.	Not always reachable.
Reduction of cattle numbers.	Resistant to reducing wealth.

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
Linguistic abilities not sufficient.	Learn to speak Tswana.
Times delays.	The sites are a bit remote and the people only drive during working hours.
NRM application should be sustainable.	Not only based on incentives, but the benefits should be realised.

7.1 方法/信息来源