方法

Individual experimental farmer: Normanton [英国]

approaches_2637 - 英国

完整性: 58%

1. 一般信息

1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

关键资源人员

SLM专业人员:
有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称(如相关)
SOWAP (SOWAP) - 匈牙利

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

1.4 SLM技术问卷的参考

2. SLM方法的描述

2.1 该方法的简要说明

Individual farmer seeking information and experimenting with machinery to maintain economic viability

2.2 该方法的详细说明

该方法的详细说明:

Aims / objectives: Maintenance of economic viability; seeking not to replace employee.

Methods: Seeking information from open days, agricultural shows, machinery manufacturers, demonstrations, other farmers in UK and overseas; experimented with drill on own farm before purchase.

Stages of implementation: Stages of implementation: information seeking over 6 months, trialled drill in one crop, hired drill for following crop on sale and return, purchase of new drill in 2002.

2.3 该方法的照片

2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点

国家:

英国

区域/州/省:

Rutland

2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标

The Approach focused mainly on other activities than SLM (economic viability)

To find appropriate machinery to maintain economic viability

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: Loss of ploughman and desire not to replace him but retain economic viability.

2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件

社会/文化/宗教规范和价值观
  • 阻碍

farmer conservatism

Treatment through the SLM Approach: seeking knowledge and advice;willingess to take risks; family support

财务资源和服务的可用性/可得性
  • 阻碍

machinery costs; desire to to replace lost employee

Treatment through the SLM Approach: preparation of sound financial case

法律框架(土地使用权、土地和水使用权)
  • 启动

Dependent on farmer attitude.

了解SLM,获得技术支持
  • 阻碍

lack of appropriate expertise

Treatment through the SLM Approach: sought advice from a number of sources

3. 相关利益相关者的参与和角色

3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策

具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:
  • 仅限土地使用者(自主)
解释:

Single land user

Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by by land users* alone (self-initiative / bottom-up). Single land user

4. 技术支持、能力建设和知识管理

4.1 能力建设/培训

是否为土地使用者/其他利益相关者提供培训?:

涵盖的主题:

Not structured training but rather through the land manager's attended at workshops and opendays.

4.4 监测和评估

监测和评估是该方法的一部分吗?:

注释:

bio-physical aspects were ad hoc monitored through observations

technical aspects were ad hoc monitored through observations

economic / production aspects were regular monitored through measurements

5. 融资和外部物质支持

5.2 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援

土地使用者是否获得实施该技术的财政/物质支持?:

5.3 对特定投入的补贴(包括劳动力)

如果土地使用者的劳动力是一项重要的投入,那么是不是:
  • 自愿

6. 影响分析和结论性陈述

6.1 方法的影响

该方法是否帮助土地使用者实施和维护SLM技术?:
  • 是,很少
  • 是,中等
  • 是,支持力度很大

Greater knowledge of good soil management.

6.3 方法活动的可持续性

土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施(无外部支持的情况下)?:

6.4 该方法的长处/优点

土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会
Bottom-up approach
编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
Self-starter (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Provision fo expert advice and knowledge to aid decision making)

6.5 该方法的弱点/缺点以及克服它们的方法

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险 如何克服它们?
Dependent on individual attitude more on-farm research and demonstartion to instill confidence; farmer-to-farmer training

7. 参考和链接

7.1 方法/信息来源

  • 实地考察、实地调查
  • 与土地使用者的访谈

模块