1.2 参与该技术评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

有助于对技术进行记录/评估的机构名称（如相关）

CDE Centre for Development and Environment (CDE Centre for Development and Environment) - 瑞士

有助于对技术进行记录/评估的机构名称（如相关）

NCCR North-South (NCCR North-South) - 吉尔吉斯斯坦

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

（现场）数据是什么时候汇编的？:

16/07/2005

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

是

2.1 技术简介

技术定义:

A buffer strip of grass is left uncultivated in the middle of an area of steep sloping cropland to help reduce soil erosion.

2.2 技术的详细说明

说明:

A grass strip, approximately 10m wide is left uncultivated across the upper part of the slope. This buffer strip is followed by an adjacent drainage ditch to enhance the technology’s capability of reducing run-on onto the field further down the slope. Neighbouring land users decided to implement the technology in order to reduce soil erosion on their cropland (wheat, chickpeas and flax), and to prevent disputes about land management practices. Upslope and downslope land users reported a significant reduction of observed rill development and fertility decline, emphasising that the benefits of the grass strip offset the area of crop land lost to it. The farmers paid equally for the lost cropland area.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: Apart from the annual digging of the drainage ditch no establishment activities are required, since the grass strip was simply left uncultivated when the former pasture was turned into cropland. The drainage ditch needs to be cleared out of soil on a regular basis; the grass strip is cut for haymaking once during each growing season. The technology is neither cost nor labour intensive and is easy to implement. Farmers state the area lost to the grass growing as the only disadvantage. However, the grass strip alone does only reduce, not fully prevent soil erosion and should therefore be combined with other SWC technologies such as drainage ditches, terraces and/or agroforestry.

2.3 技术照片

2.5 已应用该技术的、本评估所涵盖的国家/地区/地点

2.7 技术介绍

详细说明该技术是如何引入的:

• 在实验/研究期间

3.1 该技术的主要目的

• 减少、预防、恢复土地退化

3.2 应用该技术的当前土地利用类型

注释:

Major land use problems (compiler’s opinion): severe water erosion (rills and gullies) and subsequent fertility decline

Major land use problems (land users’ perception): fertility decline, soil erosion and washing downslope of seeds before they can sprout.

Type of cropping system and major crops comments: winter wheat and sometimes chickpeas are sown in autumn because farmers lack time for land cultivation in spring, flax and also chickpeas are cultivated in spring

3.3 有关土地利用的更多信息

每年的生长季节数:

• 1

具体说明:

Longest growing period in days: 210Longest growing period from month to month: Mar - Aug

3.4 该技术所属的SLM组

• 改良的地面/植被覆盖
• 横坡措施

3.5 技术传播

具体说明该技术的分布:

• 均匀地分布在一个区域

如果该技术均匀地分布在一个区域上，请注明覆盖的大致区域。:

• < 0.1 平方千米（10 公顷）

3.6 包含该技术的可持续土地管理措施

注释:

Main measures: vegetative measures

Secondary measures: agronomic measures

Type of vegetative measures: aligned: -contour

3.7 该技术强调的主要土地退化类型

注释:

Main type of degradation addressed: Wt: loss of topsoil / surface erosion

Secondary types of degradation addressed: Wg: gully erosion / gullying, Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content

3.8 防止、减少或恢复土地退化

具体数量名该技术与土地退化有关的目标:

• 防止土地退化
• 减少土地退化

注释:

Main goals: mitigation / reduction of land degradation

Secondary goals: prevention of land degradation

4.1 该技术的技术图纸

4.2 技术规范/技术图纸说明

Grass strip with adjacent drainage ditch on an area of steep sloping cropland

Location: Karsang. Faizabad Rayon, RRS

Date: 16.07.2005

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: low

Technical knowledge required for land users: low

Main technical functions: control of dispersed runoff: impede / retard, control of concentrated runoff: impede / retard, reduction of slope length

Secondary technical functions: control of concentrated runoff: drain / divert, improvement of ground cover, increase of infiltration, increase / maintain water stored in soil

Agronomic measure: drainage ditch
Remarks: width: 0.3m, depth: 0.1m, adjacent to grass strip

Aligned: -contour
Vegetative material: G : grass
Width within rows / strips / blocks (m): 10

Slope (which determines the spacing indicated above): 60%

4.3 有关投入和成本计算的一般信息

具体说明成本计算所用货币:

• 美元

4.4 技术建立活动

	活动	措施类型	时间
1.	no establishment activities needed as grass strip is left uncultivated	植物性的

4.5 技术建立所需要的费用和投入

注释:

Duration of establishment phase: 0 month(s)

4.6 维护/经常性活动

	活动	措施类型	时间/频率
1.	digging of drainage ditch	农业学的	sowing of crop / annual
2.	clearing of drainage ditch from washed in soil	农业学的	rainy season / after every rainfall event
3.	cutting of grass (haymaking)	植物性的	summer /annual

4.7 维护/经常性活动所需要的费用和投入（每年）

	对投入进行具体说明	单位	数量	单位成本	每项投入的总成本	土地使用者承担的成本%
劳动力	digging of drainage ditch	ha	1.0	1.0	1.0
劳动力	clearing of drainage ditch from washed in soil	ha	1.0	3.0	3.0
技术维护所需总成本					4.0

注释:

Machinery/ tools: tools: spade, sickle

costs per hectare (including adjacent land upslope and dowslope)

4.8 影响成本的最重要因素

描述影响成本的最决定性因素:

If the technology is not established at the point of the initial cultivation of the cropland, grass clods will need to be transplanted which considerably increases the establishment costs

5.1 气候

5.2 地形

5.3 土壤

如有可能，附上完整的土壤描述或具体说明可用的信息，例如土壤类型、土壤酸碱度、阳离子交换能力、氮、盐度等。:

Soil fertility: medium - high

Soil drainage / infiltration: medium - good

5.6 应用该技术的土地使用者的特征

说明土地使用者的其他有关特征:

75% of the land users are average wealthy and own 70% of the land (since technology requires space, poor and very poor farmers will find it difficult to implement).

Off-farm income specification: In general, all farmers (including those applying SWC technologies) are highly dependent on off-farm income, which in most cases is earned in Russia either by themselves or by their relatives.

Level of mechanization: Steep slopes do not allow cultivation by tractor or animal traction

Market orientation of production system mixed (subsistence/ commercial): Only surpluses are sold or exchanged for other goods

5.7 应用该技术的土地使用者拥有或租用的平均土地面积

5.8 土地所有权、土地使用权和水使用权

土地所有权:

• 州

土地使用权:

• 租赁

6.1 该技术的现场影响

社会经济效应

生产

收入和成本

社会文化影响

生态影响

土壤

其它生态影响

6.2 该技术的场外影响已经显现

6.4 成本效益分析

技术收益与技术建立成本相比如何（从土地使用者的角度看）？

技术收益与技术维护成本/经常性成本相比如何（从土地使用者的角度看）？

6.5 技术采用

• 单例/实验

如若可行，进行量化（住户数量和/或覆盖面积）:

Household 1

在所有采用这项技术的人当中，有多少人是自发地采用该技术，即未获得任何物质奖励/付款？:

• 90-100%

注释:

100% of land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support

1 land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support

Comments on spontaneous adoption: estimates

There is no trend towards spontaneous adoption of the Technology

Comments on adoption trend: no other land users have adopted the technology so far

6.7 该技术的优点/长处/机会

土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会
protects his land from water erosion
prevents downslope washing of seeds before germination
no conflicts about land management with neighbours upslope
defines field boundaries

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
effectively reduces formation of large rills on steep sloping cropland How can they be sustained / enhanced? substitution of drainage ditch with a permanent cut-off drain (graded) would enhance the technologies capability of reducing soil erosion
very little costs for establishment and maintainance
easy to implement, easy to maintain
helps to prevent disputes between neighbouring land users about land management practices

6.8 技术的弱点/缺点/风险及其克服方法

土地使用者认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
loss of cropland area only disadvantage

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
does only reduce, not fully prevent soil erosion	combination with other SWC technologies, such as graded drainage ditches (TAJ10)
occupies a relatively large amount of space