1.2 参与该技术评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

有助于对技术进行记录/评估的项目名称（如相关）

Book project: where people and their land are safer - A Compendium of Good Practices in Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) (where people and their land are safer)

有助于对技术进行记录/评估的机构名称（如相关）

Tear Fund Switzerland (Tear Fund Switzerland) - 瑞士

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

是

1.4 所述技术的可持续性声明

这里所描述的技术在土地退化方面是否存在问题，导致无法被认为是一种可持续的土地管理技术？:

否

注释:

So far, where this technology has been applied, soil erosion has been reduced and crop yields have increased

1.5 参考关于SLM方法（使用WOCAT记录的SLM方法）的调查问卷

2.1 技术简介

技术定义:

Farming Gods Way is a method of farming which aims to preserve soil structure through minimum tillage, mulching with grass or plant stalks and use of organic manure for improved crop yields.

2.2 技术的详细说明

说明:

The technology is applied in already existing farmlands, which are individually owned and land users are practicing conventional/traditional farming methods. An average farm size is less than half an acre.

It is built on the fact that when God created the first garden, it was a highly productive rainforest which was in need of nothing. The forest was capable of succeeding even in drought years and never slowed or lost its productivity. The trees never lost their leaves or wilt. They keep on producing flowers, fruits and seeds and are able to carry vast numbers and diversity of animal species. God put mechanisms in place which would allow the fauna, flora and soil to co-exist, with high levels of productivity, no environmental degradation, little or no erosion and a high buffering ability to withstand all the negative parameters of the harsh climate. Therefore, this technology helps to maintain soil structure and texture increasing its ability for water retention and soil fertility, thus increasing crop yields.

The major activities needed to establish the technology include; awareness creation and training land users on the technology, setting up demonstration gardens, identification of contact farmers, supporting them to establish demonstration gardens in the community and follow up support to the implementing farmers.

What the land users dislike about this technology is that it involves a lot of measurements and record keeping, which they are not used to, the mulching material is not readily available and the mulch harbors rodents.

2.3 技术照片

2.5 已应用该技术的、本评估所涵盖的国家/地区/地点

2.6 实施日期

注明实施年份:

2015

2.7 技术介绍

详细说明该技术是如何引入的:

• 通过项目/外部干预

注释（项目类型等）:

The technology was introduced under the Integrated Water Resources Management Project to support farmers to mazimise land productivity

3.1 该技术的主要目的

• 改良生产
• 减少、预防、恢复土地退化
• 保护生态系统
• 降低灾害风险
• 适应气候变化/极端天气及其影响
• 创造有益的经济影响
• 创造有益的社会影响

3.2 应用该技术的当前土地利用类型

3.4 供水

该技术所应用土地的供水:

• 雨养

3.5 该技术所属的SLM组

• 轮作制度（轮作、休耕、轮垦）
• 最小的土壤扰动
• 土壤肥力综合管理

3.6 包含该技术的可持续土地管理措施

3.7 该技术强调的主要土地退化类型

3.8 防止、减少或恢复土地退化

具体数量名该技术与土地退化有关的目标:

• 减少土地退化

4.1 该技术的技术图纸

4.2 有关投入和成本计算的一般信息

具体说明成本和投入是如何计算的:

• 每个技术区域

具体说明成本计算所用货币:

• 美元

如相关，注明美元与当地货币的汇率（例如1美元=79.9巴西雷亚尔）：1美元=:

3300.0

4.3 技术建立活动

	活动	时间（季度）
1.	Making of compost manure	After harvest of crops
2.	Clearing the land (removing above ground vegetation)	Before onset of rains
3.	Shaving the land (skinning of vegetative cover)	Before the onset of rains
4.	Seed selection	Before the onset of rains
5.	Gathering mulch material	Before the onset of rains
6.	Setting out (measuring, making planting stations, adding ash and manure)	Before the onset of rains
7.	Application of mulch	Before the onset of rains
8.	Planting	Onset of rains
9.	Thinning, staking, gap filling, top dressings	3 weeks after planting
10.	Spraying herbicides	Weekly
11.	Harvesting and storing	From 90 days onwards

4.4 技术建立所需要的费用和投入

	对投入进行具体说明	单位	数量	单位成本	每项投入的总成本	土地使用者承担的成本%
劳动力	Making compost, clearing, shaving, seed selection, gathering mulch	person days	91.0	2.12	192.92	100.0
劳动力	Setting out, applying mulch, planting, thinning, staking gap filling, spraying, harvesting and storing	person days	61.0	2.12	129.32	100.0
设备	Tools set (hoe, terrain rope, pliers, measuring tape, spade, garden fork, panga)	acre	1.0	2.952	2.95
设备	Spraying pump (1 over 20 acres)	pieces	0.05	27.27	1.36
设备	Wheel barrow (1 over 20 acres)	pieces	0.05	36.36	1.82
设备	Watering can (1 over 5 acres)	pieces	0.2	3.03	0.61
植物材料	Seed	kg	30.0	1.06	31.8	100.0
植物材料	Stakes (200 bundles used 2 times)	bundles	100.0	0.76	76.0	100.0
植物材料	Mulch	trips	10.0	30.3	303.0	100.0
肥料和杀菌剂	Pesticides	litres	0.1	6.06	0.61	100.0
技术建立所需总成本					740.39
技术建立总成本，美元					0.22

如果土地使用者负担的费用少于100%，请注明由谁负担其余费用:

Kigezi Diocese Water and Sanitation Programme

注释:

Land users can provide labour and seed but they need to be supported with tools, equipment and technical knowledge

4.5 维护/经常性活动

	活动	时间/频率
1.	Removing weeds after harvest as land users wait for next planting season	After harvest

4.6 维护/经常性活动所需要的费用和投入（每年）

	对投入进行具体说明	单位	数量	单位成本	每项投入的总成本	土地使用者承担的成本%
劳动力	Removing weeds	days	1.0	2.12	2.12	100.0
技术维护所需总成本					2.12

4.7 影响成本的最重要因素

描述影响成本的最决定性因素:

The most significant cost in this technology is mulch. In cases where land is very fragmented, it is inaccessible by road and all materials have to be carried to site which increases the costs of labour

5.1 气候

5.2 地形

说明该技术是否专门应用于:

• 不相关

5.3 土壤

5.4 水资源可用性和质量

水的盐度有问题吗？:

否

该区域正在发生洪水吗？:

是

规律性:

偶然

5.5 生物多样性

5.6 应用该技术的土地使用者的特征

5.7 应用该技术的土地使用者使用的平均土地面积

5.8 土地所有权、土地使用权和水使用权

土地所有权:

• 个人，未命名

土地使用权:

• 个人

用水权:

• 社区（有组织）

5.9 进入服务和基础设施的通道

6.1 该技术的现场影响

社会经济效应

生产

收入和成本

社会文化影响

生态影响

水循环/径流

土壤

生物多样性:植被、动物

6.2 该技术的场外影响已经显现

6.3 技术对渐变气候以及与气候相关的极端情况/灾害的暴露和敏感性（土地使用者认为的极端情况/灾害）

渐变气候

渐变气候

	季节	增加或减少	该技术是如何应对的？
年温度		增加	未知
季节性温度	湿季/雨季	增加	未知
季节性温度	旱季	增加	未知
年降雨量		减少	适度
季雨量	湿季/雨季	减少	好
季雨量	旱季	减少	好

气候有关的极端情况（灾害）

气象灾害

	该技术是如何应对的？
局地暴雨	好
局地雷暴	好
局地雹灾	好

气候灾害

	该技术是如何应对的？
陆地火灾	好

水文灾害

	该技术是如何应对的？
比较和缓的（河道）洪水	非常好
山洪暴发	非常好
滑坡	好

生物灾害

	该技术是如何应对的？
流行病	适度
昆虫/蠕虫侵扰	好

6.4 成本效益分析

技术收益与技术建立成本相比如何（从土地使用者的角度看）？

技术收益与技术维护成本/经常性成本相比如何（从土地使用者的角度看）？

注释:

The adoption rate of this technology is gradual as people keep appreciating the benefits

6.5 技术采用

• 单例/实验

如若可行，进行量化（住户数量和/或覆盖面积）:

60 land users are currently practicing the technology (Rubaya 20, Buranga 15, Kagarama 10, Kigata 15)

在所有采用这项技术的人当中，有多少人是自发的，即未获得任何物质奖励/付款？:

• 11-50%

6.6 适应

最近是否对该技术进行了修改以适应不断变化的条件？:

否

6.7 该技术的优点/长处/机会

土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会
1) The technology has greatly improved crop yields . For example one farmer used to harvest 10kg of beans after planting 1.5kg. but with this technology he harvests over 50kg
2) When the land is mulched you spend less labour on weeding
3) Less seed is used because measurements are used during planting

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
1) This technology helps improve soil structure, leading to improved soil fertility and hence improved crop yields
2) With minimum tillage and minimum weeding, less labour is required by land users

6.8 技术的弱点/缺点/风险及其克服方法

土地使用者认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
1) The technology requires a lot of mulch which is not easy to get	Land users are encouraged to use the previous harvest as mulch
2) Land fragmentation increases costs of labour
3) This technology attracts thieves because the garden stands out in terms of crop quality	Land users have developed by-laws to deal with such cases
4) Mulch attracts rodents which later destroy crops

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
1) Land users feel that this technology is tiresome and time consuming mainly due to taking measurements and collection of mulch. This has affected the uptake of the technology	Learning from the success of those which have implemented, gradually land users attitude will change

7.1 信息的方法/来源

7.2 参考可用出版物

标题、作者、年份、ISBN:

Kigezi Diocese Water and Sanitation Programme, Annual Report (April 2015 - March 2016)

可以从哪里获得?成本如何?

www.kigezi-watsan.ug

7.3 链接到网络上的相关信息

标题/说明:

Farming Gods Way

URL:

http://www.farming-gods-way.org/overview.htm