This is an outdated, inactive version of this case. Go to the current version.
Approaches
Inactive

Management of transboundary transhumance [Niger]

Transboundary cooperation on transhumance

approaches_2850 - Niger

Completeness: 94%

1. General information

1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Approach

Key resource person(s)

SLM specialist:

MAHAMADOU GAMBO

+227 20 650 905 / +227 96 51 58 50

gambokabirou@yahoo.fr / Mah_gambo@yahoo.fr

Directorate of the Department of Livestock Keeping of Dosso

Dosso, Republic of Niger

Niger

regional elected representative:

OUMAROU Boubacar

+ 227 20 65 02 19 / + 227 96 06 16 27

boumarou89@yahoo.fr

Regional Council of Dosso

1st Vice-president of the Regional Council of Dosso

Niger

SLM specialist:

IDDE Ibrahim

+227 20 65 03 17

idde_ibrahim57@yahoo.fr

Regional Directorate of Livestock Keeping

Regional Directorate of Livestock Keeping, Region of Dosso

Niger

Representative of Livestock Keeping Associations:

MAOUDE Moussa

+227 97 26 49 96

Cooperative of Livestock Keeping Associations in Niger (CAPAN)

CAPAN Dosso

Niger

local elected representative:

YOUNOUSSA Moussa

+227 96 66 62 03

Rural municipality of Falmey

Municipality of Falmey, Region of Dosso

Niger

SLM specialist:
{'additional_translations': {}, 'value': 'Issaka DAN DANO', 'user_id': '3947', 'unknown_user': False, 'template': 'raw'}
{'additional_translations': {}, 'value': 31, 'label': 'Name of project which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Approach (if relevant)', 'text': 'Programme d’Appui au Secteur de l’Elevage au Niger (PASEL 7)', 'template': 'raw'} {'additional_translations': {}, 'value': 6001, 'label': 'Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Approach (if relevant)', 'text': 'Vétérinaire Sans Frontière Belgique (VSF-Belgium) - Belgium', 'template': 'raw'}

1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT

When were the data compiled (in the field)?

01/06/2017

The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:

Yes

2. Description of the SLM Approach

2.1 Short description of the Approach

Management of transboundary transhumance in order to create the conditions for a conflict-free access to resources for livestock keeping in Niger and in northern Benin.

2.2 Detailed description of the Approach

Detailed description of the Approach:

The approach involves multiple actors, and is based on the cooperation between actors in the border region between Benin and Niger, so as to handle the concerns of livestock keepers practicing transhumance, who are victims of harassment and conflicts related to the access to resources for livestock keeping. It is a framework of exchange between the various actors in charge of managing the mobility of livestock keepers across the border.
The approach aims at the appropriation and application by the various actors of the community legislation on transboundary transhumance, which was adopted by the Economic Community of West African States (CEDEAO), in a context which is marked by an increased competition for access to natural resources, and by the effects of climate change. The approach consists of: i) implementing a framework for cooperative management of the transboundary transhumance between Benin and Niger; ii) ensure a wide dissemination of the community legislation of the CEDEAO on the management of the transhumance practices, and iii) enable a conflict-free and sustainable access to the resources for livestock keeping in the two countries.

The main methods used are: the development of the Scheme for regional Land Management (SAF), the building of the necessary infrastructure for livestock keeping (marking of the corridors and grazing areas, restoration and management of rangelands, establishment of vaccination centres, etc.), the raising of awareness among livestock keepers, the organisation of the livestock keepers on the ground (grass-roots land commission, local committee of transhumance), the organisation of transboundary and local fora, and the monitoring of the implementation of the recommendations forthcoming from the meetings.

The process took place in several stages: the actors of the civil society and the livestock keeping services first identified, together with the livestock keepers, the difficulties related to the transhumance in the two countries. Next they proceeded to inform and make aware the livestock keepers and farmers on the community legislation of the CEDEAO. Under the responsibility of the authorities of the two countries, transboundary and local fora were organized periodically to discuss difficulties related to the transhumance. The census of all transhumant livestock keepers enabled to facilitate the delivery of travel documents (International Certificate of Transhumance (CIT) and identity document). The committee for receiving the transhumant livestock keepers has been implemented and is functioning. It is composed of municipalities, the civil society, and heads of the livestock keepers. Its role is to receive and guide the livestock keepers and to facilitate their stay. A mechanism has been put in place to monitor the implementation of the decisions and recommendations during the periodic meetings between the parties.

The regional council is the contracting authority, and ensures the general coordination of the process, and the monitoring of the recommendations. The administrative and customary authorities participate in the information and awareness-raising of the population, and in the management of conflicts. The municipalities carry out the recommendations and facilitate the access to travel documents. The role of the civil society organisations is to watch the process, to identify the key actors, and to inform and make aware the leaders of the livestock keepers and the transhumant livestock keepers. The services for livestock keeping issue the International Certificate of Transhumance (CIT), and take part in the awareness-raising and census of the transhumant livestock keepers. The land commissions secure the resources for livestock keeping. The water and forestry services provide information on the management of protected and listed resources. The Program to Support the Livestock Keeping Sector (PASEL7) finances the process and provides technical support.

The livestock keepers appreciated the participatory and inclusive character of the approach, which enabled them to share their concerns with all key actors, and to use their language (Fulfulde) in the exchange during the sessions for awareness-raising. The livestock keepers have also appreciated the selection of the municipality of Karimama in Benin as the main entrance zone to Benin for the transhumant livestock keepers. However, the livestock keepers regretted the bad logistical organisation of the sessions for awareness-raising, which did not allow to reach the maximum number of livestock keepers in any of the municipalities in Niger.

2.3 Photos of the Approach

2.4 Videos of the Approach

Comments, short description:

n/a

Location:

n/a

Name of videographer:

n/a

2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Approach has been applied

Country:

Niger

Region/ State/ Province:

Region of Dosso in Niger, and Department of Alibori in Benin

Comments:

Corridor for transhumance between Niger and Benin

2.6 Dates of initiation and termination of the Approach

Indicate year of initiation:

2016

Comments:

The approach is a continuous process of reflection and actions between the legal entities on the border between Benin and Niger.

2.7 Type of Approach

  • project/ programme based

2.8 Main aims/ objectives of the Approach

The objective of the approach is to achieve understanding and application of the community legislation on transboundary transhumance, which was adopted by the heads of State and Government of the Economic Community of West African States (CEDEAO) in order to prevent and reduce the conflicts related to the mobility of livestock keeping, and to foster a better use of resources for livestock keeping in the two countries.

2.9 Conditions enabling or hindering implementation of the Technology/ Technologies applied under the Approach

social/ cultural/ religious norms and values
  • enabling

Facilitate the arrangement of social agreements in the process of securing land resources for livestock keeping.

  • hindering

The difficulties are most often related to the ignorance of herders accompanying the animals in transhumance. They are illiterate and lack knowledge of the regulations on mobility across the border.

availability/ access to financial resources and services
  • enabling

Availability of funding from the Program to Support the Livestock Keeping Sector (PASEL7) to organize the process.

  • hindering

Weak mobilization of other funding sources to ensure the co-funding of the cross-border meetings.

institutional setting
  • enabling

Emergence of new actors like the local and regional authorities in the two countries.

  • hindering

The meetings have not yet been formalized.

collaboration/ coordination of actors
  • enabling

Existence of a framework for cooperation between multiple actors, and for synergy in actions, lead by the Regional Council of Dosso.

policies
  • enabling

Existence of laws and regulations governing the transboundary transhumance in the framework of the Economic Community of West African States (CEDEAO), and existence of an act on pastoralism and a rural code in Niger.

land governance (decision-making, implementation and enforcement)
  • enabling

Existence of functional decentralized structures in the rural code of Niger and in the region of Dosso.

3. Participation and roles of stakeholders involved

3.1 Stakeholders involved in the Approach and their roles

  • local land users/ local communities

Communities of Peul livestock keepers, generally young herders and their families.

They provide the information and profit from the actions.

  • community-based organizations

Grass-roots groups of livestock keepers, who are members of the umbrella organisations of livestock keepers (Association for the Revitalization of Livestock Keeping in Niger - AREN, National Federation of Livestock Keepers in Niger - FENEN Daddo, Group of Cultural Action and Development of Young Livestock Keepers - GAJEL)

Awareness-raising and coaching of livestock keepers

  • SLM specialists/ agricultural advisers

Decentralized services for livestock keeping

Issue the International Certificate of Transhumance (CIT), participate in the awareness-raising of the livestock keepers, conduct the census of transhumant livestock keepers, operate the vaccination of the animals.

  • NGO

Organisations of livestock keepers (NGOs and associations)

Social mobilization and awareness-raising among the livestock keepers

  • local government

Local and regional authorities: Regional Councils and municipalities

Program management, general coordination of the process, facilitating the issuance of civil status documents

  • international organization

Swiss cooperation in Niger
Vétérinaires Sans Frontières, Belgium

Funding of the process
Accompanying the process

If several stakeholders were involved, indicate lead agency:

n/a

3.2 Involvement of local land users/ local communities in the different phases of the Approach
Involvement of local land users/ local communities Specify who was involved and describe activities
initiation/ motivation interactive The regional council has planned the activity following exchanges with livestock keepers from the region.
planning interactive Exchanges with the livestock keepers to specify the problems and to suggest appropriate strategies and actions
implementation self-mobilization The initiative to practice transhumance and the compliance with regulatory requirements are within the competence of the livestock keeper.
monitoring/ evaluation interactive The communities provide useful information and take decisions on solutions.

3.3 Flow chart (if available)

{'additional_translations': {}, 'content_type': 'image/png', 'preview_image': '/media/61/d/61d1c875-1b49-4722-85dc-1ba12e511e92.jpg', 'key': 'Flow chart', 'value': '/media/43/8/4386466c-2531-4fe6-99c5-91306877992d.png', 'template': 'raw'}
Description:

This scheme summarizes the organisation of the transboundary meetings, as mentioned in the description of the approach.

Author:

Issaka Dan Dano

3.4 Decision-making on the selection of SLM Technology/ Technologies

Specify who decided on the selection of the Technology/ Technologies to be implemented:
  • all relevant actors, as part of a participatory approach
Explain:

The processes to secure rangelands are defined in Niger through the provisions in the rural code. Consultation with the local population is essential to select the works to implement. The project has conducted all the processes on the ground with the participation of the farmers and the livestock keepers in all the intervention zones.

Specify on what basis decisions were made:
  • evaluation of well-documented SLM knowledge (evidence-based decision-making)

4. Technical support, capacity building, and knowledge management

4.1 Capacity building/ training

Was training provided to land users/ other stakeholders?

No

4.2 Advisory service

Do land users have access to an advisory service?

Yes

Specify whether advisory service is provided:
  • at permanent centres
  • in the settlements and grazing areas
Describe/ comments:

The livestock keeping services provide useful information to the livestock keepers on the transhumance and on enabling conditions. They issue the International Certificate of Transhumance to transhumant livestock keeping, after having vaccinated their herd. They are present in the field to organize joint meetings to inform and make aware livestock keepers, and receive the leaders and livestock keepers who seek information in their office. The Civil Society Organisations participate in these services, especially in the field, and support the mobilization of the community.

4.3 Institution strengthening (organizational development)

Have institutions been established or strengthened through the Approach?
  • yes, moderately
Specify the level(s) at which institutions have been strengthened or established:
  • local
  • regional
  • transboundary level
Describe institution, roles and responsibilities, members, etc.

An advisory committee is established for the transboundary transhumance, bringing together the actors from Benin and from Niger. The committee is set to the level of the municipalities, the region and the border region. It includes the mayors, Civil Society Organisations of livestock keepers, the decentralized technical services, the land commissions and the leaders of the communities of livestock keepers.

Specify type of support:
  • financial
  • guidance
Give further details:

The Program to Support the Livestock Keeping Sector (PASEL7) contributes to the funding and provides guidance and support to the actors in the implementation of the process.

4.4 Monitoring and evaluation

Is monitoring and evaluation part of the Approach?

Yes

Comments:

The monitoring and evaluation are integrated in the steering of the process through periodic cross-border meetings, and are operated by the regional council with the support of PASEL7.

If yes, is this documentation intended to be used for monitoring and evaluation?

No

Comments:

n/a

4.5 Research

Was research part of the Approach?

No

5. Financing and external material support

5.1 Annual budget for the SLM component of the Approach

If precise annual budget is not known, indicate range:
  • 100,000-1,000,000
Comments (e.g. main sources of funding/ major donors):

The funding is provided by PASEL7, a program financed by the Swiss Cooperation in Niger, and implemented under the lead of VSF-Belgium. In the long term, it is envisaged that the actors themselves are fully in charge of financing the approach.

5.2 Financial/ material support provided to land users

Did land users receive financial/ material support for implementing the Technology/ Technologies?

No

5.3 Subsidies for specific inputs (including labour)

  • none
 
Comments:

n/a

5.4 Credit

Was credit provided under the Approach for SLM activities?

No

5.5 Other incentives or instruments

Were other incentives or instruments used to promote implementation of SLM Technologies?

No

6. Impact analysis and concluding statements

6.1 Impacts of the Approach

Did the Approach empower local land users, improve stakeholder participation?
  • No
  • Yes, little
  • Yes, moderately
  • Yes, greatly

The compliance with the procedures for transhumance, as defined by the CEDEAO, has slightly improved. Hence the number of International Certificates of Transhumance issued since the start of the approach has increased from 6 to 216.

Did the Approach enable evidence-based decision-making?
  • No
  • Yes, little
  • Yes, moderately
  • Yes, greatly

The meeting takes informed decisions based on consultation with the livestock keepers and the administrative and customary authorities. Initially interviews were held to collect the needs and information from the livestock keepers.

Did the Approach improve knowledge and capacities of other stakeholders?
  • No
  • Yes, little
  • Yes, moderately
  • Yes, greatly

The livestock keepers have better understood the community regulations (CEDEAO) on the transhumance, and the challenges of compliance.

Did the Approach build/ strengthen institutions, collaboration between stakeholders?
  • No
  • Yes, little
  • Yes, moderately
  • Yes, greatly

The different stakeholders collaborate regularly and exchange information, which facilitates the management of the transhumance on either side between Benin and Niger.

Did the Approach mitigate conflicts?
  • No
  • Yes, little
  • Yes, moderately
  • Yes, greatly

There has been a sharp decrease in conflicts between farmers and livestock keepers, as well as of the acts of violence towards the transhumant livestock keepers. Before the approach was implemented, there were regular arrests by the border authorities in Niger for conflicts related to the transbounday transhumance; these have now become sporadic.

Did the Approach improve issues of land tenure/ user rights that hindered implementation of SLM Technologies?
  • No
  • Yes, little
  • Yes, moderately
  • Yes, greatly

The approach has enabled the clarification of the ownership status of certain grazing areas, and has strengthened the proportional representation of the grass-roots land commissions.

Did the Approach improve access to markets?
  • No
  • Yes, little
  • Yes, moderately
  • Yes, greatly

The free movement across the border of the transhumant livestock keepers facilitates the access to the livestock markets in northern Benin. As a result, livestock keepers are now well supplied with live cattle.

Did the Approach improve the capacity of the land users to adapt to climate changes/ extremes and mitigate climate related disasters?
  • No
  • Yes, little
  • Yes, moderately
  • Yes, greatly

The transhumance is a strategy for resilience of Sahelian livestock production systems, by facilitating the access to grazing land for Sahelian livestock keepers in bordering countries.

6.2 Main motivation of land users to implement SLM

  • increased production

Better feeding of the herd enables to increase the productivity of the livestock.

  • increased profit(ability), improved cost-benefit-ratio

Profitable price for fatted animals

  • reduced land degradation

Enrichment of the soils and less pressure on the resources

  • reduced risk of disasters

The mobility reduces the risk of crises in livestock keeping in Niger.

  • rules and regulations (fines)/ enforcement

Taxation by the municipalities in Benin

  • prestige, social pressure/ social cohesion

A larger herd and the practicing of transhumance increase the social status of the livestock keeper.

  • customs and beliefs, morals

The transhumance is not only a production system, but also a way of living for the livestock keepers who practice it. Therefore it has an important cultural role.

  • conflict mitigation

Far fewer conflicts between farmers and livestock keepers, and between livestock keepers.

6.3 Sustainability of Approach activities

Can the land users sustain what has been implemented through the Approach (without external support)?
  • yes
If yes, describe how:

The approach has fostered the contacts between the actors involved; they only need to ensure their continued accountability. The results which have already been achieved will enable actors to undertake the approach in the long term. Considerations will be made on how to secure the funding by the actors themselves. The Land Management Scheme will serve as a guidance for such an approach to manage the mobility of livestock keeping.

6.4 Strengths/ advantages of the Approach

Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the land user’s view
Flexibility in the acquisition of civil status documents and of the International Certificate of Transhumance
Effective involvement of the authorities of Niger and Benin
Reconciliation of the leaders of livestock keepers, the Civil Society Organisations and the border authorities of the two countries

6.5 Weaknesses/ disadvantages of the Approach and ways of overcoming them

Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the land user’s view How can they be overcome?
Weak feedback of recommendations in Benin Informing the established monitoring committee in writing
Insufficient information on the boundaries of the protected and listed areas in Benin
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view How can they be overcome?
There is a high risk that the approach is abandoned or becomes irregular after the end of the PASEL7 project. Support to the mobilization of other partners is ongoing.
The lack of supplies in the forms for the International Certificate of Transhumance frequently slows down their issuance. The Regional Directorate for Livestock Keeping makes arrangements to ensure the availability of forms in the period of preparation for the transhumance.

7. References and links

7.1 Methods/ sources of information

  • field visits, field surveys

Several livestock keepers were involved in focus group meetings.

  • interviews with land users

Unspecified

  • interviews with SLM specialists/ experts

5 SLM experts

7.2 References to available publications

Title, author, year, ISBN:

Guide Méthodologique: Processus d'élaboration du schéma d’aménagement foncier (SAF), Secrétariat permanent du code rural Niger, avril 2011

Available from where? Costs?

Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Keeping, Permanent secretary of the rural code in Niger

Title, author, year, ISBN:

Conflits fonciers ruraux au Niger: les mécanismes de prévention et de gestion, Secrétariat permanent du code rural Niger, édition 2014

Available from where? Costs?

Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Keeping, Permanent secretary of the rural code in Niger

Title, author, year, ISBN:

Recueil des textes sur le pastoralisme, Secrétariat permanent du code rural Niger, mai 2014

Available from where? Costs?

Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Keeping, Permanent secretary of the rural code in Niger

Title, author, year, ISBN:

Sécurisation des Espaces Pastoraux, Programme d'Appui au secteur de l’élevage phase 6 (PASEL6), 2015

Available from where? Costs?

VSF-Belgium in Niger

Title, author, year, ISBN:

Capitalisation sur les stratégies et adaptation aux évolutions du contexte, PASEL6, 2015

Available from where? Costs?

VSF-Belgium in Niger

Title, author, year, ISBN:

Opérationnalité des structures du code rural, PASEL6, 2015

Available from where? Costs?

VSF-Belgium in Niger

Title, author, year, ISBN:

Accompagnement des acteurs sur le SAF, PASEL6, 2015

Available from where? Costs?

VSF-Belgium in Niger

Links and modules

Expand all Collapse all

Modules