This is an outdated, inactive version of this case. Go to the current version.
Technologies
Inactive

Réhabilitation par mise en défens. [Morocco]

Mise en défens

technologies_3210 - Morocco

Completeness: 88%

1. General information

1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Technology

Key resource person(s)

SLM specialist:
SLM specialist:

Didi Alaoui Ahmed

00212619110331

Haut Commissariat aux Eaux et Forêts et à la Lutte contre la Désertification

DREFLC, Agadir, Secteur Amskroud

Morocco

SLM specialist:
Name of project which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Decision Support for Mainstreaming and Scaling out Sustainable Land Management (GEF-FAO / DS-SLM)
Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Royaume du Maroc, Haut Commissariat aux Eaux et Forêts et à la Lutte Contre la Désertification (Royaume du Maroc) - Morocco

1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT

When were the data compiled (in the field)?

06/01/2017

The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:

Yes

1.4 Declaration on sustainability of the described Technology

Is the Technology described here problematic with regard to land degradation, so that it cannot be declared a sustainable land management technology?

No

1.5 Reference to Questionnaire(s) on SLM Approaches

2. Description of the SLM Technology

2.1 Short description of the Technology

Definition of the Technology:

Interdiction d'accès aux animaux (pâturage direct et indirect) pour assurer la dynamique progressive de la végétation et son développement.

2.2 Detailed description of the Technology

Description:

La mise en défens est instauré après l'incendie de forêt de 2011.
En plus de la l'interdiction des usages habituels de la population locale (paturage, ramassage du bois mort, etc) et tous les sujets incendiés sont recépés.
Avec uniquement l'exclusion des usages habituels et le respect de la mise en défens on attend une reprise de la végétation spontannée naturellement.
La restriction au parcours et autres activités humaines de prélèvement de produit est une mesure qui ne peut être efficace que grace à l'adhésion des usagers pour le respect de la mis en défens. Dans ce cas, les usagers se sont organisés en association et bénéficient de la compensation à raison de 350 dh/an/ha en application de la réglementation relative à la suspension des droits d'usages mise au point depuis 2002.
Après 5 à 6 ans de mise en défens, on remarque bien que la mise en défens a donné des résultats très satisfaisants en matère de réhabilitation du couvert arboré et du développement des espèces locales.

2.3 Photos of the Technology

2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment

Country:

Morocco

Region/ State/ Province:

Agadir et tout le pays

Further specification of location:

Commune d'Amskroud

Comments:

Zone jbel Tirghoudine - Sloum Iguenane (Commune d'Amskroud)

2.6 Date of implementation

Indicate year of implementation:

2012

2.7 Introduction of the Technology

Specify how the Technology was introduced:
  • as part of a traditional system (> 50 years)

3. Classification of the SLM Technology

3.1 Main purpose(s) of the Technology

  • improve production
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity

3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied

Grazing land

Grazing land

Extensive grazing land:
  • Semi-nomadism/ pastoralism
Main animal species and products:

Caprins

Forest/ woodlands

Forest/ woodlands

Products and services:
  • Fruits and nuts
  • Other forest products
  • Grazing/ browsing
  • Nature conservation/ protection
Comments:

Toute utilisation est suspendue actuellement.

If land use has changed due to the implementation of the Technology, indicate land use before implementation of the Technology:

- Pâturages sur des prairies naturelles ou semi-naturelles, prairies arborées/ arbustives (savanes) ou boisement ouvert pour l’élevage ou la faune sauvage.
- Forêts composées principalement d’arbres indigènes non plantés par l’homme.

3.3 Further information about land use

Water supply for the land on which the Technology is applied:
  • rainfed
Number of growing seasons per year:
  • 1

3.4 SLM group to which the Technology belongs

  • natural and semi-natural forest management
  • pastoralism and grazing land management
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover

3.5 Spread of the Technology

Specify the spread of the Technology:
  • evenly spread over an area
If the Technology is evenly spread over an area, indicate approximate area covered:
  • 10-100 km2

3.6 SLM measures comprising the Technology

management measures

management measures

  • M2: Change of management/ intensity level

3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology

soil erosion by water

soil erosion by water

  • Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
biological degradation

biological degradation

  • Bc: reduction of vegetation cover
  • Bh: loss of habitats

3.8 Prevention, reduction, or restoration of land degradation

Specify the goal of the Technology with regard to land degradation:
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land

4. Technical specifications, implementation activities, inputs, and costs

4.1 Technical drawing of the Technology

4.2 Technical specifications/ explanations of technical drawing

La mise en défens est une mesure soft qui consiste à installer la restriction aux activités humaine (pâturage, bois, etc) qui ne demande aucun investissement sur le terrain (cloture, etc). Le gardiennage est payé avant l'engagement des usagers à respecter la mise en défens, La population est responsabilisée et le gardiennage est assuré par eux même.

4.3 General information regarding the calculation of inputs and costs

Specify how costs and inputs were calculated:
  • per Technology area
Indicate size and area unit:

750 ha

Specify currency used for cost calculations:
  • US Dollars
Indicate exchange rate from USD to local currency (if relevant): 1 USD =:

10.0

Indicate average wage cost of hired labour per day:

1200 dhs/mois (prise en charge par l'association)

4.4 Establishment activities

Activity Type of measure Timing
1. Recepage et nettoiement des arbres et arbustes incendiés Vegetative Après incendie 2012
2. Sensibilisation des usagers Structural 2012
3. Mise au point de contrat de compensation et engagement des usagers au respect de la mise en défens Agronomic 2013

4.5 Costs and inputs needed for establishment

Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit Total costs per input % of costs borne by land users
Labour Recepage ha 750.0 1000.0 750000.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 750000.0
If land user bore less than 100% of costs, indicate who covered the remaining costs:

Etat / Service des Eaux et Forêts

Comments:

Le respect et le gardiennage des mises en défens est composé à raison de 350 dirhams/ha/an (35 USD). La main d'oeuvre est payée de ce montant de la compensation.

4.6 Maintenance/ recurrent activities

Activity Type of measure Timing/ frequency
1. Montant de la compensation annuelle Management Novembre

4.7 Costs and inputs needed for maintenance/ recurrent activities (per year)

Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit Total costs per input % of costs borne by land users
Other Compensation mise en défens ha 750.0 35.0 26250.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 26250.0
If land user bore less than 100% of costs, indicate who covered the remaining costs:

Etat

Comments:

Les usagers contribuent en nature par le gardiennage assuré spontannement par tous les membres.

5. Natural and human environment

5.1 Climate

Annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Specify average annual rainfall (if known), in mm:

150.00

Agro-climatic zone
  • arid

5.2 Topography

Slopes on average:
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms:
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitudinal zone:
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Indicate if the Technology is specifically applied in:
  • not relevant

5.3 Soils

Soil depth on average:
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil):
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface):
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
Topsoil organic matter:
  • medium (1-3%)

5.4 Water availability and quality

Ground water table:

on surface

Is water salinity a problem?

No

Is flooding of the area occurring?

No

5.5 Biodiversity

Species diversity:
  • medium
Habitat diversity:
  • medium

5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Sedentary or nomadic:
  • Sedentary
Market orientation of production system:
  • subsistence (self-supply)
Off-farm income:
  • 10-50% of all income
Relative level of wealth:
  • poor
Individuals or groups:
  • groups/ community
Level of mechanization:
  • manual work
Gender:
  • men
Age of land users:
  • youth
  • middle-aged

5.7 Average area of land owned or leased by land users applying the Technology

  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Comments:

Espace du domaine de l'état dont la population possède seulement le droit d'usage.

5.8 Land ownership, land use rights, and water use rights

Land ownership:
  • state
  • suspendu
Water use rights:
  • individual
Comments:

Droit d'utilisation suspendu par la mise en défens.

5.9 Access to services and infrastructure

health:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
education:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
technical assistance:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
employment (e.g. off-farm):
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
markets:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
energy:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
roads and transport:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
drinking water and sanitation:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
financial services:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good

6. Impacts and concluding statements

6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown

Socio-economic impacts

Production

fodder production

decreased
increased
Comments/ specify:

Non utilisable

forest/ woodland quality

decreased
increased
Quantity before SLM:

brulé

Quantity after SLM:

En réhabilitation

Socio-cultural impacts

land use/ water rights

worsened
improved
Comments/ specify:

Suspendu

Ecological impacts

Water cycle/ runoff

surface runoff

increased
decreased
Comments/ specify:

Réhabilitation du couvert

Soil

soil cover

reduced
improved
Quantity before SLM:

brulé

Quantity after SLM:

En réhabilitation

soil loss

increased
decreased
Comments/ specify:

En réhabilitation

Biodiversity: vegetation, animals

Vegetation cover

decreased
increased

biomass/ above ground C

decreased
increased
Climate and disaster risk reduction

flood impacts

increased
decreased

6.2 Off-site impacts the Technology has shown

downstream flooding

increased
reduced
Quantity before SLM:

dénudé

Quantity after SLM:

réhabilitation

Comments/ specify:

Couvert sol

6.3 Exposure and sensitivity of the Technology to gradual climate change and climate-related extremes/ disasters (as perceived by land users)

Gradual climate change

Gradual climate change
Season Type of climatic change/ extreme How does the Technology cope with it?
seasonal temperature spring decrease moderately
annual rainfall decrease not well
seasonal rainfall decrease moderately

Climate-related extremes (disasters)

Climatological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it?
drought not well
forest fire moderately

6.4 Cost-benefit analysis

How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?
Short-term returns:

very negative

Long-term returns:

neutral/ balanced

How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?
Short-term returns:

neutral/ balanced

Long-term returns:

positive

6.5 Adoption of the Technology

Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have did so spontaneously, i.e. without receiving any material incentives/ payments?
  • 50-90%
Comments:

La technologie est adoptée par le département des forêts. L'application est sous la responsabilité des usagers pour recevoir en contre partie la compensation en vigueur.

6.6 Adaptation

Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?

No

6.7 Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities of the Technology

Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the land user’s view
Facilite la reconstitution des forêts
Réhabilitation des espèces végétales et animales
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
Un moyen efficace pour la réhabilitation des ecosystèmes présentant un potentiel écologique important
Cette technologie engage moins de frais pour la réhabilitation des écosystèmes forestiers

6.8 Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks of the Technology and ways of overcoming them

Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the land user’s view How can they be overcome?
Superficie importante est mise en défens Réhabilitation progressive
Taux faible de la compensation. Augmentation du taux de la compensation
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view How can they be overcome?
Opposition de certains usagers Nécessité d'engager la responsabilité des usagers dans ce type d'action

7. References and links

7.1 Methods/ sources of information

  • field visits, field surveys

Plusieurs visites dans le cadre des projets de recherche-développement.

  • interviews with SLM specialists/ experts

Chef de secteur et reponsables provinciaux.

Links and modules

Expand all Collapse all

Modules