Rehabilitation of Degraded Lands ( Area closure) [Etiopía]
- Creación:
- Actualización:
- Compilador: Unknown User
- Editor: –
- Revisor: Fabian Ottiger
Kutura
technologies_1072 - Etiopía
Visualizar secciones
Expandir todo Colapsar todos1. Información general
1.2 Detalles de contacto de las personas de referencia e instituciones involucradas en la evaluación y la documentación de la Tecnología
1.3 Condiciones referidas al uso de datos documentados mediante WOCAT
¿Cuándo se compilaron los datos (en el campo)?
30/05/2011
El compilador y la/s persona(s) de referencia claves aceptan las condiciones acerca del uso de los datos documentados mediante WOCAT:
Sí
1.5 Referencia al (los) Cuestionario(s) de Enfoques MST
Community Organizations and Mobilization for Soil and Water … [Etiopía]
Community mobilization for soil and water conservation work in a watershed planning unit is an approach for collective action by organizing all active labor forces living in the kebele/peasant association into development group of 20-30 members and further divide into 1:5 work force to implement construction of soil and water …
- Compilador: Gizaw Desta Gessesse
2. Descripción de la Tecnología MST
2.1 Breve descripción de la Tecnología
Definición de la Tecnología:
Closing the degraded land to let it to regenerate by excluding human and animal interference ans speed up the regeneration process by applying some SWC activities and undertake enrichment plantation.
2.2 Descripción detallada de la Tecnología
Descripción:
Area closure is suitable for degraded lands. Degraded areas are excluded from animal and human contact and integrated with activities that speed up regeneration process such as SWC activities, agronomic measures, vegetative and management measures.
Purpose of the Technology: Area closure improves the productivity of degraded lands and protects down stream fields and properties from flooding and improves ground water recharge.
Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: Management and utilization plan prepared and agreed. Planning and design of supplimentary measures are integrated.
Natural / human environment: Area closure is applicable in all areas that have lost vegetation cover and has low soil fertility.
2.5 País/ región/ lugares donde la Tecnología fue aplicada y que se hallan comprendidos por esta evaluación
País:
Etiopía
Región/ Estado/ Provincia:
SNNPR
Especifique más el lugar :
Lemo
Map
×2.6 Fecha de la implementación
Si no se conoce el año preciso, indique la fecha aproximada:
- hace más de 50 años atrás (tradicional)
2.7 Introducción de la Tecnología
Especifique cómo se introdujo la Tecnología:
- mediante proyectos/ intervenciones externas
Comentarios (tipo de proyecto, etc.):
It is introduced technology.
3. Clasificación de la Tecnología MST
3.1 Propósito(s) principal(es) de la Tecnología MST
- reducir, prevenir, restaurar la degradación del suelo
- conservar el ecosistema
3.2 Tipo(s) actuales de uso de la tierra donde se aplica la Tecnología
Tierras cultivadas
- Cosecha anual
- Cultivos perennes (no leñosos)
- Cosecha de árboles y arbustos
Cosechas principales (comerciales y de subsistencia):
Major cash crop annual cropping: Wheat
Major food crop annual cropping: Teff, barley, beans
Major food crop perennial (non-woody) cropping: Enset
Major cash crop tree/shrub cropping: Coffee, Chat
Cultivos asociados (cultivos/ pastoreo/ árboles), incl. agroforestería
- Agro-silvopastoralismo
Principales productos/ servicios:
Forest products and services: timber, fuelwood, grazing / browsing, nature conservation / protection
Comentarios:
Major land use problems (compiler’s opinion): Overgrazing, low awarness of land users, lack of management plan for communal lands and low level of diversification of land users activities.
Major land use problems (land users’ perception): Shortage of grazing lands, lack of common understanding of the management of common resources.
Semi-nomadism / pastoralism: Yes
Grazingland comments: Inspite of decreasing grazing lands, farmers still want to own some heads of livestock. Grazinglands as a result are highly pressurized. Land users cut grass from area closures and carry them home to feed their livestock. Some land users who have few polts for grazing close them to grow grass.
Plantation forestry: Yes
Problems / comments regarding forest use: Natural forests do not exist. Planted forests are managed by the community. In the SWC area, a larger area was planted some 20 years ago but at present the planted forests have been cleared for cultivation. This is the result of high population growth. Some of the planteed forests have been cleared by demobilizing soldiers.
Type of cropping system and major crops comments: Cereals - Legumes - Cereals
Constraints of infrastructure network (roads, railways, pipe lines, power lines)
3.3 Información adicional sobre el uso de tierras
Provisión de agua para la tierra donde se aplica la Tecnología:
- de secano
Número de temporadas de cultivo por año:
- 2
Especifique:
Longest growing period in days: 180 Longest growing period from month to month: Apr - Nov Second longest growing period in days: 150 Second longest growing period from month to month: Jan - May
3.4 Grupo MST al que pertenece la Tecnología
- veda de zona (detener uso, apoyar la restauración)
3.5 Difusión de la Tecnología
Comentarios:
Total area covered by the SLM Technology is 10.5 km2.
Communities develop positive attitude towards activities implemented and results obtained such as livestock feed, fuel wood, bee forage, farm implements and construction materials.
3.6 Medidas MST que componen la Tecnología
3.7 Principales tipos de degradación del suelo encarados con la Tecnología
erosión de suelos por agua
- Wt: pérdida de capa arable/ erosión de la superficie
- Wg: erosión en cárcavas
- Wo: efectos de degradación fuera del sitio
deterioro químico del suelo
- Cn: reducción de la fertilidad y contenido reducido de la materia orgánica del suelo (no ocasionados por la erosión)
deterioro físico del suelo
- Pu: pérdida de la función bioproductiva a causa de otras actividades
degradación del agua
- Ha: aridificación
Comentarios:
Main type of degradation addressed: Wt: loss of topsoil / surface erosion, Wg: gully erosion / gullying
Secondary types of degradation addressed: Wo: offsite degradation effects, Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content, Pu: loss of bio-productive function due to other activities, Ha: aridification
3.8 Prevención, reducción o restauración de la degradación del suelo
Especifique la meta de la Tecnología con relación a la degradación de la tierra:
- restaurar/ rehabilitar tierra severamente degradada
Comentarios:
Secondary goals: prevention of land degradation, mitigation / reduction of land degradation
4. Especificaciones técnicas, actividades de implementación, insumos y costos
4.2 Especificaciones técnicas/ explicaciones del dibujo técnico
SNNPR
Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: high
Technical knowledge required for land users: low
Main technical functions: control of dispersed runoff: retain / trap, control of concentrated runoff: retain / trap, improvement of ground cover, increase of infiltration
Secondary technical functions: increase / maintain water stored in soil, water harvesting / increase water supply, increase in soil fertility
Early planting
Material/ species: maize and potato
Remarks: row planting, broad casting
Mixed cropping / intercropping
Material/ species: maize & haricot bean
Remarks: row planting
Legume inter-planting
Remarks: broad casting
Manure / compost / residues
Material/ species: animal dung
Remarks: broad casting
Contour tillage
Remarks: along the contour
In blocks
Vegetative material: T : trees / shrubs
Number of plants per (ha): 2500
Vertical interval within rows / strips / blocks (m): 2
Vegetative measure: in blocks
Vegetative material: G : grass
Number of plants per (ha): 3333
Vertical interval between rows / strips / blocks (m): 1
Spacing between rows / strips / blocks (m): 10
Vertical interval within rows / strips / blocks (m): 0.3
Width within rows / strips / blocks (m): 0.3
Vegetative measure: Vegetative material: G : grass
Vegetative measure: Vegetative material: G : grass
Vegetative measure: Vegetative material: G : grass
Trees/ shrubs species: Acacia saligina, Acaccia decurrens, Omedila, Grevillea robusta
Grass species: Desho, phalaris
Slope (which determines the spacing indicated above): 15.00%
If the original slope has changed as a result of the Technology, the slope today is (see figure below): 8.00%
Gradient along the rows / strips: 0.00%
Retention/infiltration ditch/pit, sediment/sand trap
Vertical interval between structures (m): 3
Spacing between structures (m): 10
Depth of ditches/pits/dams (m): 0.5
Width of ditches/pits/dams (m): 0.3
Length of ditches/pits/dams (m): 3
Height of bunds/banks/others (m): 0.3
Width of bunds/banks/others (m): 1
Length of bunds/banks/others (m): 3
Terrace: forward sloping
Vertical interval between structures (m): 2
Spacing between structures (m): 10
Depth of ditches/pits/dams (m): 0.3
Width of ditches/pits/dams (m): 0.5
Length of ditches/pits/dams (m): 5
Height of bunds/banks/others (m): 0.3
Width of bunds/banks/others (m): 1
Length of bunds/banks/others (m): 30
Construction material (earth): Soil excavated from the ditches is used to make the embankment
Construction material (stone): Hill side terraces are supported with stones at the downslope side to make them stronger and stable.
Slope (which determines the spacing indicated above): 15%
If the original slope has changed as a result of the Technology, the slope today is: 8%
Lateral gradient along the structure: 0%
Vegetation is used for stabilisation of structures.
Change of land use type: from degraded agricultural land to area closure and practicing of cut and carry.
Other type of management: change of management / intensity level - from open access forms of grazing to guarding, plantation and construction of various SWC techniques.
4.3 Información general sobre el cálculo de insumos y costos
otra / moneda nacional (especifique):
Birr
Indique la tasa de cambio de USD a la moneda local (si fuese relevante): 1 USD =:
8,6
Indique el costo promedio del salario de trabajo contratado por día:
0.70
4.4 Actividades de establecimiento
Actividad | Tipo de medida | Momento | |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Seedling production | Vegetativas | through out the year |
2. | Transportation | Vegetativas | beginning of rains |
3. | Planting | Vegetativas | beginning of rains |
4. | Surveying | Estructurales | dry season |
5. | Digging of ditches and construction of structural measures | Estructurales | dry season |
6. | Stablization of terraces | Estructurales | |
7. | Surveying the degraded land | Manejo | dry season |
8. | Awarness creation | Manejo | slack period from farming |
9. | Planning | Manejo | any time |
10. | Closing the area | Manejo |
4.5 Costos e insumos necesarios para el establecimiento
Especifique insumo | Unidad | Cantidad | Costos por unidad | Costos totales por insumo | % de los costos cubiertos por los usuarios de las tierras | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mano de obra | Labour | ha | 1,0 | 505,8 | 505,8 | 50,0 |
Equipo | Machine use | ha | 1,0 | 83,27 | 83,27 | |
Equipo | Tools | ha | 1,0 | 19,26 | 19,26 | 70,0 |
Material para plantas | Seeds | ha | 1,0 | 69,76 | 69,76 | 100,0 |
Material para plantas | Seedlings | ha | 1,0 | 116,28 | 116,28 | 100,0 |
Costos totales para establecer la Tecnología | 794,37 |
Comentarios:
Duration of establishment phase: 24 month(s)
4.6 Actividades de establecimiento/ recurrentes
Actividad | Tipo de medida | Momento/ frequencia | |
---|---|---|---|
1. | land preparation | Agronómicas | before rains / each cropping season |
2. | Replanting | Vegetativas | rainy season /once |
3. | Stablization of terraces | Estructurales | rainy season/annual |
4. | Appointing guards | Manejo | / annual |
4.7 Costos e insumos necesarios para actividades de mantenimiento/ recurrentes (por año)
Especifique insumo | Unidad | Cantidad | Costos por unidad | Costos totales por insumo | % de los costos cubiertos por los usuarios de las tierras | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equipo | Machine use | ha | 1,0 | 81,39 | 81,39 | |
Material para plantas | Seedlings | ha | 1,0 | 7,3 | 7,3 | 100,0 |
Indique los costos totales para mantenecer la Tecnología | 88,69 |
Comentarios:
Machinery/ tools: hoe, shovel, gaso
The cost is calculated for labour needed to the construct SWC activities to rehablitate one hectar of degraded land.
4.8 Factores más determinantes que afectan los costos:
Describa los factores más determinantes que afectan los costos:
Higher slopes and shallow soil depths increase the cost of construction.
5. Entorno natural y humano
5.1 Clima
Lluvia anual
- < 250 mm
- 251-500 mm
- 501-750 mm
- 751-1,000 mm
- 1,001-1,500 mm
- 1,501-2,000 mm
- 2,001-3,000 mm
- 3,001-4,000 mm
- > 4,000 mm
Especificaciones/ comentarios sobre la cantidad de lluvia:
900-1400 mm
Zona agroclimática
- Sub-húmeda
> 180 days of LGP
5.2 Topografía
Pendientes en promedio:
- plana (0-2 %)
- ligera (3-5%)
- moderada (6-10%)
- ondulada (11-15%)
- accidentada (16-30%)
- empinada (31-60%)
- muy empinada (>60%)
Formaciones telúricas:
- meseta/ planicies
- cordilleras
- laderas montañosas
- laderas de cerro
- pies de monte
- fondo del valle
Zona altitudinal:
- 0-100 m s.n.m.
- 101-500 m s.n.m.
- 501-1,000 m s.n.m
- 1,001-1,500 m s.n.m
- 1,501-2,000 m s.n.m
- 2,001-2,500 m s.n.m
- 2,501-3,000 m s.n.m
- 3,001-4,000 m s.n.m
- > 4,000 m s.n.m
Comentarios y especificaciones adicionales sobre topografía :
Altitudinal zone: 2001-2500 m a.s.l. ( <2400m a.s.l., ranked 1) and 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l. ( >1900m a.s.l., ranked 2)
Slopes on average: Rolling (ranked 1), hilly (ranked 2) and gentle, moderate and steep (all ranked 3)
5.3 Suelos
Profundidad promedio del suelo:
- muy superficial (0-20 cm)
- superficial (21-50 cm)
- moderadamente profunda (51-80 cm)
- profunda (81-120 cm)
- muy profunda (>120 cm)
Textura del suelo (capa arable):
- mediana (limosa)
- fina/ pesada (arcilla)
Materia orgánica de capa arable:
- media (1-3%)
- baja (<1%)
Si se halla disponible, adjunte una descripción completa de los suelos o especifique la información disponible, por ej., tipo de suelo, pH/ acidez de suelo, capacidad de intercambio catiónico, nitrógeno, salinidad, etc. :
Soil depth on average: Also moderately deep (ranked 2) and shallow (ranked 3)
Soil texture: Fine/heavy (mainly clay loam, ranked 1) and medium (ranked 2)
Soil fertility is medium (ranked 1), low (ranked 2), high (ranked 3)
Soil drainage/infiltration is good (ranked 1) and medium (ranked 2)
Soil water storage capacity high (ranked 1) and medium (ranked 2)
5.6 Las características de los usuarios de la tierra que aplican la Tecnología
Orientación del mercado del sistema de producción:
- subsistencia (autoprovisionamiento)
- mixta (subsistencia/ comercial)
Ingresos no agrarios:
- menos del 10% de todos los ingresos
Nivel relativo de riqueza:
- pobre
- promedio
Nivel de mecanización:
- trabajo manual
- tracción animal
Indique otras características relevantes de los usuarios de las tierras:
Population density: 200-500 persons/km2
Annual population growth: 3% - 4%
6% of the land users are rich and own 15% of the land.
45% of the land users are average wealthy and own 40% of the land.
35% of the land users are poor and own 30% of the land.
12% of the land users are poor and own 20% of the land.
Off-farm income specification: Some land users are engaged in small trading and some are daily labourer when they are free from field activities.
Level of mechanization: Animal traction (oxen plough system, ranked 1) and manual work (hoe and gaso, ranked 2)
Market orientation of forest production system: Mixed (ranked 1, individual plantation for market and domestic consumption), subsistence (ranked 2, individual woodlots plantation for domestic consumption) and commercial/market (ranked 3, community plantation for sale)
5.7 Área promedio de la tierra que pertenece a o es arrendada por usuarios de tierra que aplican la Tecnología
- < 0.5 ha
- 0.5-1 ha
- 1-2 ha
- 2-5 ha
- 5-15 ha
- 15-50 ha
- 50-100 ha
- 100-500 ha
- 500-1,000 ha
- 1,000-10,000 ha
- > 10,000 ha
Comentarios:
Crop land: Average holding size is about 0.5 ha
Grazing land: Owing to expansion of cultivated land, grazing land size has reduced and estimated at about 0.1 ha per household.
Forest land: Due to cultivated land expansion the average holding size is about 0.15ha
5.8 Tenencia de tierra, uso de tierra y derechos de uso de agua
Tenencia de tierra:
- estado
Derechos de uso de tierra:
- individual
6. Impactos y comentarios para concluir
6.1 Impactos in situ demostrados por la Tecnología
Impactos socioeconómicos
Producción
producción de cultivo
Comentarios/ especifique:
soil depth increased and soil fertility improved.
producción de forraje
Comentarios/ especifique:
biomass increased
calidad de forraje
Comentarios/ especifique:
biomass increased
producción de madera
Comentarios/ especifique:
construction and fuel wood available
Ingreso y costos
ingreso agrario
Comentarios/ especifique:
land productivity per unit area improved.
Impactos socioculturales
instituciones comunitarias
instituciones nacionales
MST/ conocimiento de la degradación del suelo
mitigación de conflicto
Comentarios/ especifique:
loss of land for grazing and cultivation
Impactos ecológicos
Ciclo de agua/ escurrimiento de sedimento
drenaje de agua en exceso
Suelo
humedad del suelo
Comentarios/ especifique:
productivity is enhanced
cubierta del suelo
Comentarios/ especifique:
vegetation cover is improved
Biodiversidad: vegetación, animales
control de pestes/ enfermedades
Comentarios/ especifique:
Introduction of pests/wild animals
Otros impactos ecológicos
Soil fertility
Biodiversity
6.2 Impactos fuera del sitio demostrados por la Tecnología
corriente confiable y estable fluye en estación seca
Comentarios/ especifique:
ground water recharging is improved
inundaciones río abajo
Comentarios/ especifique:
runoff from the watershed is highly reduced
colmatación río abajo
Comentarios/ especifique:
sediments deposited behind the bund
6.4 Análisis costo-beneficio
¿Cómo se comparan los beneficios con los costos de establecimiento (desde la perspectiva de los usuarios de tierra)?
Ingresos a corto plazo:
negativo
Ingresos a largo plazo:
positivo
¿Cómo se comparan los beneficios con los costos de mantenimiento/ recurrentes (desde la perspectiva de los usuarios de tierra)?
Ingresos a corto plazo:
ligeramente positivo
Ingresos a largo plazo:
positivo
6.5 Adopción de la Tecnología
Si tiene la información disponible, cuantifique (número de hogares y/o área cubierta):
3990
De todos quienes adoptaron la Tecnología, ¿cuántos lo hicieron espontáneamente, es decir, sin recibir incentivos/ pagos materiales?
- 0-10%
Comentarios:
97% of land user families have adopted the Technology with external material support
3800 land user families have adopted the Technology with external material support
Comments on acceptance with external material support: estimates
5% of land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support
190 land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support
Comments on spontaneous adoption: estimates
There is a moderate trend towards spontaneous adoption of the Technology
Comments on adoption trend: The farmers have made some modifications in order to increase the effectivness of the technology, by making fences around enclosures.
6.7 Fuerzas/ ventajas/ oportunidades de la Tecnología
Fuerzas/ ventajas/ oportunidades desde la perspectiva del usuario de la tierra |
---|
Feed and forage sources improved How can they be sustained / enhanced? Cut and carry system |
Availability of fuel wood, farm implements and construction materials How can they be sustained / enhanced? integrate with multipurpose tree species |
Income from beekeeping due to area closure |
Fuerzas/ ventajas/ oportunidades desde la perspectiva del compilador o de otra persona de referencia clave |
---|
Income generated from wood and grass sales. How can they be sustained / enhanced? Equal share from the benefit to all land users. |
Rapid recovery and rehabilitation of degraded lands. How can they be sustained / enhanced? Integrate with multipurpose techniques and encourage cut and carry system. |
The environment is protected, wildlife attracted and unproductive areas become productive. How can they be sustained / enhanced? Awarness creation and technical support |
Vínculos y módulos
Expandir todo Colapsar todosVínculos
Community Organizations and Mobilization for Soil and Water … [Etiopía]
Community mobilization for soil and water conservation work in a watershed planning unit is an approach for collective action by organizing all active labor forces living in the kebele/peasant association into development group of 20-30 members and further divide into 1:5 work force to implement construction of soil and water …
- Compilador: Gizaw Desta Gessesse
Módulos
No se hallaron módulos