1.2 ລາຍລະອຽດ ການຕິດຕໍ່ ຂອງບຸກຄົນທີ່ຊັບພະຍາກອນ ແລະ ສະຖາບັນ ການມີສ່ວນຮ່ວມ ໃນການປະເມີນຜົນ ແລະ ເອກະສານ ຂອງວິທີທາງ

ຊື່ຂອງໂຄງການ ທີ່ອໍານວຍຄວາມສະດວກ ໃນການສ້າງເອກກະສານ ຫຼື ປະເມີນດ້ານແນວທາງ (ຖ້າກ່ຽວຂ້ອງ)

NEW LIFE Project (NEW LIFE)

ຊື່ຂອງ ສະຖາບັນການຈັດຕັ້ງ ທີ່ອໍານວຍຄວາມສະດວກ ໃນການສ້າງເອກກະສານ ຫຼື ປະເມີນແນວທາງ (ຖ້າກ່ຽວຂ້ອງ)

m.c.m Ecosistemi (m.c.m Ecosistemi)

1.3 ເງື່ອນໄຂ ຂອງການນໍາໃຊ້ເອກກະສານຂໍ້ມູນ ຂອງ WOCAT

ເມື່ອໃດທີ່ໄດ້ສັງລວມຂໍ້ມູນ (ຢູ່ພາກສະໜາມ)?

05/09/2023

ຜູ້ສັງລວມ ແລະ ບັນດາຜູ້ຕອບແບບສອບຖາມ ຍອມຮັບໃນເງື່ອນໄຂ ການນໍາໃຊ້ຂໍ້ມູນເອກະສານ ທີ່ສ້າງຂື້ນ ໂດຍຜ່ານ ອົງການ WOCAT:

ແມ່ນ

1.4 ເອກະສານອ້າງອີງ (ຫຼາຍ) ກັບແບບສອບຖາມ (ຫຼາຍ) ເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ ຂອງດ້ານການຄຸ້ມຄອງ ດິນແບບຍືນຍົງ

2.1 ການອະທິບາຍ ໂດຍຫຍໍ້ ຂອງວິທີທາງ

Reconstitution of soils is a patented pedotechnology that brings benefits to degraded soils. Simultaneously, it raises awareness of the potential of restoring soil fertility through recycling. The approach starts with the identification of the soil issue, and the technology is then planned, implemented and promoted through a consortium.

2.2 ການອະທິບາຍ ລາຍລະອຽດ ຂອງວິທີທາງ

ການອະທິບາຍ ລາຍລະອຽດ ຂອງວິທີທາງ:

The approach to reconstitution of soils is guided and led by m.c.m. Ecosistemi in its role as a consortium leader, together with land users, soil experts and local authorities. Reconstitution of soils is a patented pedotechnology that brings benefits to degraded, barren and desertified soils. Simultaneously, it helps raise awareness of the potential of recycling in restoration of soil as part of a “circular economy”.
The technology of soil reconstitution arose about 20 years ago from a concept, later patented by Ecosistemi, to fight soil degradation through the guiding principle of recycling environmental suitable waste. From its conception until now, reconstitution has been improved and implemented through a consortium involving Ecosistemi, soil scientists, land users, farmers, and local authorities – while being supported by various national, European and international research projects.
To explain the approach in detail, one project more than any other has been central to demonstrating and promoting the technology: the EU project “New Life” (https://www.lifeplusecosistemi.eu/). The planning, application and monitoring phases under the New Life project are the same each time that reconstitution is the tool employed to restore an area.
To take one example under the New Life project, the intervention area was about 20 hectares in the Trebbia River Park (in the city of Piacenza, Italy). In the 1980s it was a landfill site for solid urban waste. When the landfill was closed, the waste was covered by a thin layer of soil on which rehabilitation efforts were carried out though planting trees and shrubs. However, these interventions, due to the poor quality of the soil used, failed, leaving the area in a state of continued degradation.
Some years later, after evaluating the state of the area, Ecosistemi proposed reconstitution as a potential tool for land restoration. As the land was a public area and large, it was necessary to find funding to support the restoration. Ecosistemi therefore contacted the University of Piacenza and local authorities to create a consortium, and after discussions Ecosistemi searched for funding opportunities. A proposal was drawn up for a restoration project which was then presented for funding under a EU programme and approved (https://www.lifeplusecosistemi.eu/). This then provided the go-ahead for successful restoration to form a recreational area.
Based this experience, the prototype for the approach to reconstitution of soils can be summarized as:
1) Identification of degraded land - through alerts from farmers and/ or local authorities and/ or universities;
2) Creation of a consortium;
3) Searching for funding opportunities (by the consortium), but if no funding is found, Ecosistemi prepares a profit and loss account using different scenarios to evaluate whether restoration is viable;
4) Assessing the soils threats to be solved - by the consortium;
5) Ecosistemi develops plans for implementation, based on core principles and practices of soil restoration;
6) Application of the restoration technology by Ecosistemi;
7) Monitoring of results by Ecosistemi and soil experts of the consortium;
8) Dissemination of the results through scientific articles, articles in local newspapers, interviews and in schools - by the consortium.

2.3 ຮູບພາບຂອງແນວທາງ

2.4 ວີດີໂອ ຂອງວິທີທາງ

2.5 ປະເທດ / ເຂດ / ສະຖານທີ່ບ່ອນທີ່ແນວທາງໄດ້ຖືກນໍາໃຊ້

2.6 ວັນທີເລີ່ມຕົ້ນ ແລະ ສິ້ນສຸດ ການຈັດຕັ້ງປະຕີບັດ ວິທີທາງ

2.7 ປະເພດຂອງແນວທາງ

• research, growth, innovation

2.8 ເປົ້າໝາຍ / ຈຸດປະສົງຫຼັກ ຂອງການຈັດຕັ້ງປະຕິບັດ ວິທີທາງ

The reconstitution of soils approach, whose guiding principle is the "circular economy", copes with land degradation and desertification. The approach's aim is to support the implementation of the "reconstitution of soils" technology , creating a consortium of soil experts, local authorities and people with the aim of restoring degraded land, sealed soils, soils with low chemical and/ or physical fertility.

2.9 ເງື່ອນໄຂອໍານວຍ ຫຼື ຂັດຂວາງການປະຕິບັດຂອງເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ / ເຕັກໂນໂລຢີການນໍາໃຊ້ຕາມແນວທາງ

3.1 ຜູ້ມີສ່ວນຮ່ວມ ໃນວິທີທາງ ແລະ ພາລະບົດບາດ ຂອງເຂົາເຈົ້າ

3.2 ການມີສ່ວນຮ່ວມຂອງຜູ້ນໍາໃຊ້ທີ່ດິນໃນທ້ອງຖິ່ນ / ຊຸມຊົນທ້ອງຖິ່ນໃນໄລຍະທີ່ແຕກຕ່າງກັນຂອງແນວທາງ

	ການລວບລວມ ເອົາຜູ້ນໍາໃຊ້ດິນ ໃນທ້ອງຖິ່ນ / ຊຸມຊົນທ້ອງຖິ່ນ	ໃຫ້ລະບຸ ຜູ້ໃດທີ່ມີສ່ວນຮ່ວມ ໃນແຕ່ລະກິດຈະກໍາ?
ການເລີ່ມຕົ້ນ / ແຮງຈູງໃຈ	ການຮ່ວມມື	Iniziation of the approach started from the identification of the threat to be solved and so local users are key actors
ການວາງແຜນ	ການຮ່ວມມື	Planning is made by all the stakeholders of the approach leading by Ecosistemi
ການປະຕິບັດ	ບໍ່ມີ	Implementation is carried out only by m.c.m. Ecosistemi
ຕິດຕາມກວດກາ / ການປະເມີນຜົນ	ການຮ່ວມມື	They take part in monitoring the results about for example their perception of a restored land after the application of the approach

3.3 ແຜນວາດ (ຖ້າມີ)

3.4 ການຕັດສິນໃຈກ່ຽວກັບການຄັດເລືອກເຕັກໂນໂລຢີຂອງການຄຸ້ມຄອງທີ່ດິນແບບຍືນຍົງ / ເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ

ລະບຸ ຄົນທີ່ຕັດສິນໃຈ ກ່ຽວກັບການຄັດເລືອກຂອງ ເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ / ເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ ຈະໄດ້ຮັບການປະຕິບັດ:

• ພາກສ່ວນກ່ຽວຂ້ອງທັງໝົດ, ເປັນສ່ວນໜຶ່ງ ຂອງວິທີທາງແບບມີສ່ວນຮ່ວມ

ອະທິບາຍ:

Ecosistemi, as it is the leader of the approach, decides about the implementation of Reconstitution of Soils Approach because only they have the whole knowledge about Reconstitution of Soils and soil threats

Specify on what basis decisions were made:

• ປະເມີນເອກກະສານ ຄວາມຮູ້ກ່ຽວກັບ ການຄຸ້ມຄອງ ທີ່ດິນແບບຍືນຍົງ (ຫຼັກຖານທີ່ຊ່ວຍໃນການຕັດສິນໃຈ)
• ຜົນທີ່ໄດ້ຮັບ ຈາກການຄົ້ນຄວ້າ
• ປະສົບການສ່ວນບຸກຄົນ ແລະ ຄວາມຄິດເຫັນ (ທີ່ບໍ່ເປັນເອກກະສານ)

4.1 ການສ້າງຄວາມສາມາດ / ການຝຶກອົບຮົມ

ຜູ້ນໍາໃຊ້ທີ່ດິນ ຫຼື ພາກສ່ວນກ່ຽວຂ້ອງອື່ນໆ ໄດ້ຮັບການຝຶກອົບຮົມບໍ່?

ແມ່ນ

ໃຫ້ລະບຸ ຜູ້ໃດທີ່ໄດ້ຮັບການຝຶກອົບຮົມ:

• ພະນັກງານພາກສະໜາມ / ທີ່ປຶກສາ

ຖ້າເປັນໄປໄດ້, ໃຫ້ລະບຸເພດ, ອາຍຸ, ສະຖານະພາບ, ຊົນເຜົ່າ, ແລະ ອື່ນໆ:

Gender is inclusive; everyone can be trained

ຮູບແບບຂອງການຝຶກອົບຮົມ:

• ການເຮັດຕົວຈິງ
• ເນື້ອທີ່ສວນທົດລອງ
• ກອງປະຊຸມ

ໃນຫົວຂໍ້:

Natural soil management, organic matter conservation, reconstituted soil management, agricultural management

4.2 ການບໍລິການໃຫ້ຄໍາປຶກສາ

ເຮັດຜູ້ໃຊ້ທີ່ດິນມີການເຂົ້າເຖິງການບໍລິການໃຫ້ຄໍາປຶກສາ?

ແມ່ນ

ລະບຸວ່າການສະໜອງ ການບໍລິການ ໃຫ້ຄໍາປຶກສາ:

• ໃນພື້ນທີ່ຂອງຜູ້ນໍາໃຊ້ດິນ
• ສູນຄົ້ນຄວ້າ

ອະທິບາຍ / ຄວາມຄິດເຫັນ:

Training on natural and reconstituted soils management, on soil degradation processes, on the production process used by company providing waste to be tested in the approach

4.3 ສະຖາບັນການສ້າງຄວາມເຂັ້ມແຂງ (ການພັດທະນາອົງການຈັດຕັ້ງ)

ສະຖາບັນ ໄດ້ຮັບການສ້າງຕັ້ງຂື້ນ ຫຼື ໄດ້ຮັບການສ້າງຄວາມເຂັ້ມແຂງ ໂດຍການຈັດຕັ້ງປະຕິບັດ ວິທີທາງບໍ່?

• ມີ, ພໍສົມຄວນ

ລະບຸ ທາງສະຖາບັນ ໄດ້ສ້າງຄວາມເຂັ້ມແຂງ ໃນລະດັບໃດ (ຫຼາຍ):

• ທ້ອງຖິ່ນ
• ລະດັບພາກພື້ນ

ອະທິບາຍ ສະຖາບັນການຈັດຕັ້ງ, ພາລະບົດບາດ ແລະ ໜ້າທີ່ຮັບຜິດຊອບ, ສະມາຊິກ ແລະ ອື່ນໆ.

Local and regional institutions such as municipality and trade associations, have the roles of the dissemination of the results through people and of financial support

ລະບຸ ປະເພດ ຂອງສະໜັບສະໜູນ:

• ທາງດ້ານການເງິນ

• dissemination

ໃຫ້ລາຍລະອຽດເພີ່ມເຕີມ:

Search for funding opportunities (regional projects): dissemination of the results through articles in local newspapers and/ or interviews

4.4 ຕິດຕາມກວດກາ ແລະ ປະເມີນຜົນ

ການຈັດຕັ້ງປະຕິບັດ ວິທີທາງ ໄດ້ມີການປະເມີນຜົນ ແລະ ຕິດຕາມບໍ?

ແມ່ນ

ຄວາມຄິດເຫັນ:

Soil monitoring and evaluation are the only way to know if the technology is able to solve soil problem to cope with. After that the obtained results can be disseminated and so to eventually find a new area to start a new implementation

ຖ້າແມ່ນ, ເອກກະສານສະບັບນີ້ ແມ່ນໄດ້ນໍາໃຊ້ເຂົ້າໃນການຕິດຕາມ ແລະ ປະເມີນຜົນບໍ່?

ແມ່ນ

ຄວາມຄິດເຫັນ:

Every implementation is the base for a new project and to increase the development of the approach

4.5 ການຄົ້ນຄວ້າ

ນີ້້ແມ່ນສ່ວນໜຶ່ງ ການຄົ້ນຄວ້າ ຂອງວິທີທາງບໍ່?

ແມ່ນ

ລະບຸ ຫົວຂໍ້:

• ເສດຖະສາດ / ການຕະຫຼາດ
• ລະບົບນິເວດ
• ເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ

ໃຫ້ຂໍ້ມູນ ເພີ່ມເຕີມ ແລະ ກໍານົດ ຜູ້ໃດເຮັດການຄົ້ນຄວ້າ:

All the research is be done by m.c.m. Ecosistemi sometimes together with local institutions and/ or soil experts; the topics of the research are: chemico-physical and microbiological soils parameters, soils uses, circular economy, soil management and yield, laboratory soil analysis, suitable waste, vegetation indices, and soil fertility.

5.1 ງົບປະມານປະຈໍາປີ ສໍາລັບວິທີທາງ ຂອງການຄຸ້ມຄອງ ທີ່ດິນແບບຍືນຍົງ

ຖ້າຫາກບໍ່ຮູ້ຈັດງົບປະມານທີ່ແນ່ນອນ ແມ່ນໃຫ້ປະມານເອົາ:

• 100,000-1,000,000

ຄໍາເຫັນ (ຕົວຢ່າງ: ແຫຼ່ງຂໍ້ມູນຫຼັກ ຂອງການສະໜອງທຶນ / ຜູ້ໃຫ້ທຶນທີ່ສໍາຄັນ):

this annual budget originates from New Life project (https://www.lifeplusecosistemi.eu/) and it covers the restoration of a 10 ha land, involving 8-10 people, and all the other associated aspects of the approach.

5.2 ການສະໜັບສະໜູນ ທາງດ້ານການເງິນ / ອຸປະກອນ ສະໜອງໃຫ້ແກ່ຜູ້ນໍາທີ່ດິນ

ຜູ້ນໍາໃຊ້ດິນ ໄດ້ຮັບການສະໜັບສະໜູນ ທາງດ້ານ ການເງິນ / ອຸປະກອນ ໃນການຈັດຕັ້ງປະຕິບັດ ເຕັກໂນໂລຢີບໍ?

ແມ່ນ

ຖ້າແມ່ນ, ໃຫ້ລະບຸປະເພດ (ຫຼາຍ) ຂອງການສະໜັບສະໜູນ, ເງື່ອນໄຂ ແລະ ຜູູ້ສະໜອງ (ຫຼາຍ):

Subsidies from funding programs based on a research project

5.3 ເງິນສົມທົບສໍາລັບການນໍາໃຊ້ສະເພາະປັດໃຈຂາເຂົ້າໃນການຜະລີດກະສິກໍາ (ລວມທັງແຮງງານ)

• ແຮງງານ

• ອຸປະກອນ

ຖ້າແຮງງານ ຂອງຜູ້ນໍາໃຊ້ດິນ ໄດ້ຮັບການສະໜັບສະໜູນ ປັດໃຈຂາເຂົ້າ, ແມ່ນບໍ່:

• ຈ່າຍເປັນເງິນສົດ

5.4 ສິນເຊື່ອ

ໄດ້ປ່ອຍສິນເຊື່ອ ສະໜອງໃຫ້ພາຍໃຕ້ ວິທີການສໍາລັບກິດຈະກໍາ ການຄຸ້ມຄອງ ທີ່ດິນແບບຍືນນຍົງບໍ່?

ບໍ່ແມ່ນ

5.5 ສິ່ງຈູງໃຈ ຫຼື ເຄື່ອງມືອື່ນໆ

ການສົ່ງເສີມ ຈັດຕັ້ງປະຕິບັດ ເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ ໃນການຄຸ້ມຄອງ ດິນແບບຍືນຍົງ ໄດ້ສະໜອງສິ່ງກະຕຸກຊຸກຍູ້ບໍ່?

ບໍ່ແມ່ນ

6.1 ຜົນກະທົບຂອງແນວທາງ

6.2 ແຮງຈູງໃຈຫຼັກຂອງຜູ້ນໍາໃຊ້ທີ່ດິນໃນການປະຕິບັດການຄຸ້ມຄອງທີ່ດິນແບບຍືນຍົງ

6.3 ຄວາມຍືນຍົງຂອງກິດຈະກໍາວິທີທາງ

ຜູ້ນໍາໃຊ້ ທີ່ດິນ ສາມາດສືບຕໍ່ ການຈັດຕັ້ງປະຕິບັດ ຜ່ານວິທີທາງໄດ້ບໍ່ (ໂດຍປາດສະຈາກ ການຊ່ວຍເຫຼືອ ຈາກພາກສ່ວນພາຍນອກ)?

• ແມ່ນ

ຖ້າ ໄດ້, ອະທິບາຍເຫດຜົນ:

The whole process, thanks to the monitoring phase (studies of the successful results), can be upscaled because every implementation of the technology becomes the starting point for a new challenge

6.4 ຈຸດແຂງ / ຂໍ້ດີ ຂອງວິທີທາງ

ຈຸດແຂງ / ຂໍ້ດີ / ໂອກາດໃນການນໍາໃຊ້ທີ່ດິນ
Strengths: - to join different skills; - promotion of the technology
Advantages: - a consortium has a greater chance of finding funding
Opportunities: - awareness raising about the connection of circular economy and soil restoration; - to create a network of soil experts to counter soil degradation

ຈຸດແຂງ / ຈຸດດີ / ໂອກາດ ຈາກທັດສະນະຂອງຜູ້ປ້ອນຂໍ້ມູນ ຫຼື ບຸກຄົນສຳຄັນ
Strengths: - join skills
Advantages: - to promote the technology in scientific community and farmers
Opportunities: - dissemination to test the approach in different land - reusing different suitable waste thanks to agro-industrial connection - to create a network of soil experts

6.5 ຈຸດອ່ອນ / ຂໍ້ເສຍຂອງແນວທາງ ແລະ ວິທີການແກ້ໄຂໃຫ້ເຂົາເຈົ້າ

ຈຸດອ່ອນ / ຂໍ້ເສຍ / ຄວາມສ່ຽງໃນມູມມອງຂອງຜູ້ນໍາໃຊ້ທີ່ດິນ	ມີວິທີການແກ້ໄຂຄືແນວໃດ?
Weaknesses: - Italian bureaucracy regarding the use of waste	to explain to local authorities that all the waste used are environmental suitable and always monitored
Disadvantages: - long time from the submission of the project to commission evaluation	making a test plot using a pilot reconstitution plant
Risks: - financial difficult if the consortium and the project presented for funding is rejected	profit and loss account to evaluate if the restoration can be made exploring different scenarios

ຈຸດອ່ອນ ຫຼື ຂໍ້ເສຍ ຫຼື ຄວາມສ່ຽງ ໃນມຸມມອງຂອງ ຜູ້ສັງລວມຂໍ້ມູນ ຫຼື ບັນດາຜູ້ຕອບແບບສອບຖາມ	ມີວິທີການແກ້ໄຂຄືແນວໃດ?
Weaknesses: - financial difficult if the consortium and the project presented for funding is rejected	profit and loss account to evaluate if different scenarios
Disadvantages: - time from the submission of the project to commission evaluation	pilot test in a smaller scale
Risks: - Italian bureaucracy regarding use of waste	to explain to local authorities that all the waste used are environmental suitable and always monitored

7.1 ວິທີການ / ແຫຼ່ງຂໍ້ມູນ

7.2 ເອກະສານທົ່ວໄປທີ່ສາມາດໃຊ້ໄດ້

ຫົວຂໍ້, ຜູ້ຂຽນ, ປີ, ISBN:

The reconstitution pedotechnique: Applications, Manfredi P., Cassinari C., Trevisan M., 10.1016/j.eti.2021.102246

ມີຢູ່ໃສ?ມູນຄ່າເທົ່າໃດ?

Scientific Journal

ຫົວຂໍ້, ຜູ້ຂຽນ, ປີ, ISBN:

The reconstitution: environmental restoration assessment by means of LCC and FCC, 10.6092/issn.2281-4485/8500

ມີຢູ່ໃສ?ມູນຄ່າເທົ່າໃດ?

Scientific Journal

ຫົວຂໍ້, ຜູ້ຂຽນ, ປີ, ISBN:

Trees and shrubs monitoring using an ecological approach: the conclusion of the restoration project of Borgotrebbia landfill (Northern Italy), Manfredi P., Cassinari C., Meloni F., Stragliati L., Trevisan M., Giupponi L., 10.31031/EAES.2019.06.000635

ມີຢູ່ໃສ?ມູນຄ່າເທົ່າໃດ?

Scientific Journal

ຫົວຂໍ້, ຜູ້ຂຽນ, ປີ, ISBN:

A new technology to restore soil fertility: Reconstitution, Manfredi P., Cassinari C., Francaviglia R., Trevisan M., 10.12871/00021857201933

ມີຢູ່ໃສ?ມູນຄ່າເທົ່າໃດ?

Scientific Journal

ຫົວຂໍ້, ຜູ້ຂຽນ, ປີ, ISBN:

Growth and yield response of tomato (Solarium lycopersicum L.) to soil reconstitution technology, Manfredi P., Cassinari C., Gatti M., Trevisan M., 10.12871/00021857201916

ມີຢູ່ໃສ?ມູນຄ່າເທົ່າໃດ?

Scientific Journal

ຫົວຂໍ້, ຜູ້ຂຽນ, ປີ, ISBN:

Test on the effects of reconstituted soil on emergency speed and root growth in maize, Manfredi P., Cassinari C., Salvi R., Battaglia R., Marocco A., Trevisan M., 10.1515/contagri-2018-0035

ມີຢູ່ໃສ?ມູນຄ່າເທົ່າໃດ?

Scientific Journal

ຫົວຂໍ້, ຜູ້ຂຽນ, ປີ, ISBN:

Osservazione di Lycogala terrestre Fr. e Stemonitis axifera (Bull.) T. Macr. su suoli ricostituiti sabbiosi, Manfredi P., Salvi R., Bersan M., Cassinari C., Marocco A., Trevisan M.

ມີຢູ່ໃສ?ມູນຄ່າເທົ່າໃດ?

Scientific Journal

ຫົວຂໍ້, ຜູ້ຂຽນ, ປີ, ISBN:

Relationship between hydraulic properties and plant coverage of the closed-landfill soils in Piacenza (Po Valley, Italy), Cassinari C., Manfredi P., Giupponi L., Trevisan M., Piccini C., 10.5194/se-6-929-2015

ມີຢູ່ໃສ?ມູນຄ່າເທົ່າໃດ?

Scientific Journal

ຫົວຂໍ້, ຜູ້ຂຽນ, ປີ, ISBN:

Soil temperature fluctuations in a degraded and in a reconstituted soil, Manfredi P., Cassinari C., Trevisan M., ISBN 20385625

ມີຢູ່ໃສ?ມູນຄ່າເທົ່າໃດ?

Scientific Journal

ຫົວຂໍ້, ຜູ້ຂຽນ, ປີ, ISBN:

Confronto tra dati produttivi di mais coltivato su terre ricostituite e terre naturali, Manfredi P., Tassi D., Cassinari C.

ມີຢູ່ໃສ?ມູນຄ່າເທົ່າໃດ?

Scientific Journal

7.3 ການເຊື່ອມຕໍ່ກັບຂໍ້ມູນທີ່ກ່ຽວຂ້ອງທີ່ສາມາດໃຊ້ອອນໄລນ໌

ຫົວຂໍ້ / ພັນລະນາ:

Ecosistemi web site

URL:

www.mcmecosistemi.com

ຫົວຂໍ້ / ພັນລະນາ:

Paolo Manfredi ResearchGate

URL:

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paolo-Manfredi-2

ຫົວຂໍ້ / ພັນລະນາ:

Chiara Cassinari ResearchGate

URL:

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Chiara-Cassinari

ຫົວຂໍ້ / ພັນລະນາ:

All the publications with DOI mentioned above

ຫົວຂໍ້ / ພັນລະນາ:

Ecosistemi YouTube channel

URL:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOloFv-BLgvIVt9kBZuZyZg