Esta é uma versão desatualizada e inativa deste caso. Ir para a versão atual.
Tecnologias
Inativo

Gradual development of bench terraces from contour ditches [Tajiquistão]

Ташакули тадричии терассахо тавассути чуйборхои контури

technologies_1043 - Tajiquistão

Completude: 80%

1. Informação geral

1.2 Detalhes do contato das pessoas capacitadas e instituições envolvidas na avaliação e documentação da tecnologia

Pessoa(s) capacitada(s)

Especialista em GST:

hafizova tahmina

Deutsche Welthungerhilfe, Tajikistan

Tajiquistão

Nome da(s) instituição(ões) que facilitou(ram) a documentação/ avaliação da Tecnologia (se relevante)
Welthungerhilfe (Welthungerhilfe) - Tajiquistão

1.3 Condições em relação ao uso da informação documentada através de WOCAT

Quando os dados foram compilados (no campo)?

02/05/2011

O compilador e a(s) pessoa(s) capacitada(s) aceitam as condições relativas ao uso de dados documentados através do WOCAT:

Sim

2. Descrição da tecnologia de GST

2.1 Descrição curta da tecnologia

Definição da tecnologia:

Use of the SLM technology facilitates the development of bench terraces from contour channels by gradually removing soil material up the slope for an estimated 5 years until the terraces on the slope reach a desired width of 1.2 m.

2.2 Descrição detalhada da tecnologia

Descrição:

The SLM technology is thought to stop water run-off resulting in the prevention of damage to the top soil on steep slopes. This enables better distribution and infiltration of water into the soil. A complementing live fence, along with a metal net along the perimeter aim to stop livestock grazing. Contour ditches are planted in intervals with fruit trees, and the live fence is made of a combination of fire wood, trees and bushes. This combination makes possible the establishment of an agro forestry system on a slope in an area with limited irrigation using making use of the natural rainfall.
Details: 1. Ditches are dug out along the contour lines drawn by an "A" frame on the slope. 2. Seedlings are planted in 5 metre intervals, positioned right in the middle of the ditch. 3. The back wall behind each tree (upslope) has a half moon cutting to enable an even water/moisture supply. 4. The ditches are barriered with "septas" between two trees to trap water in the individual sections. 5. Horizontally across the ditches, the tree species vary, but vertically are homogeneous. 6. The strips between ditches are left free to enable natural grass to grow. 7. The residual soil material is mounted in front of the ditches in piles the width of a shovel. 8. The complementing perimeter live fence and metal net (1.5m height) is supported by wooden poles made of Acacia trees. (Assumed life span of poles is 25 years). 9. Improvised drip irrigation with 5 litre plastic bottles is used together with mulch coverage beneath the trees. 10. Species composition: apple, cherry, apricot, grape, walnut, pomegranate. In the garden; species of Acacia, Ailantus, dogroses and willow act as a live fence.

Purpose of the Technology: The aim of this system is to significantly reduce the water run-off that removes the top soil, and to subsequently prevent water erosion, and the formation/development of gullies. This can be achieved through the following methods; conserving the available resources and using them more efficiently, prevention overgrazing and improving the natural soil cover, as well as changing the type of land management towards a more sustainable and profitable one.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: The plot was established on one side of a micro watershed. In mid February the contour lines were identified using an “A” frame. Digging of contour ditches then took until late February. The material was accumulated down the slope in deposits the width of a shovel to build a riser. At the beginning of March all the fruit tree seedlings were planted in the middle of the ditches. Perimeter fencing was constructed and live fence plants were planted up until late March. In May, the grass around the trees was cut and used for mulching beneath the trees. During June and July in the first year the plants needed watering 3 times a week which was done using a drip irrigation system with 5 litre plastic bottles. To help prevent the water heating and evaporating, the bottles were left under the mulch cover. Mulching and irrigation are repeated every dry and hot season. Every spring, the soil material is removed alongside the inner wall of the ditch just taking an amount that equals the width of a shovel, and accumulated down the slope to extend the riser. Materials required include: (1) Ditches: hand tools, stakes, rope, “A” frame, (2) Live fence: seedlings of Acacia, Ailantus, willow and dog rose, (3) Fencing: metal net, wooden poles, metal wire, (4) Cow dung, lime suspension, straw, mulch, plastic bottles.

Natural / human environment: The watershed can be characterised as follows: Hydrology - surface water is available only at times of rain and snow melt, this can be used for irrigation only. No sources of potable water exist. Soils are of loess type, as generally characteristic to the whole area. Flora - natural grasses prevail in the micro watershed, 9 species could be identified. Natural bushes and trees were completely removed due to high demand for fuelwood. Cultivation of rare tree varieties and household gardening was practiced in advance of the project. Fauna - Wild animals are often still seen such as turtles, lizards and snakes. Farm animals - mixed breeds of cattle, sheep and goats are very important. The households in this micro watershed area own almost 350 animals. The majority of these are kept for the summer season in adjacent pastures. The micro watershed was first inhabited in early 2000. Five households were established with a total of around 40 inhabitants. Family heads tend to be in their early 40s. Families have 7 to 9 members, including 5 to 7 children. All are of Tajik ethnicity, and Muslim, open to secular values. Of these 5 households, only 4 households have adopted the SLM technology. The fifth household only decided to join the project after witnessing their neighbour’s positive experiences. Both spouses tended to be involved in the activities. Both men and women took part in the training sessions and orientation meeting. However, it is likely that most decisions were made by the men, after the women had shared their ideas. Work load: providing the external inputs, construction and the heavy manual labour were done by the men. Maintenance work: watering, mulching and grass cutting was shared between men and women. Digging and fencing were performed in "hashars" - community labour groups. As women spend more time at home working within their households, they tend to perform more maintenance work on the plot compared to men. Other activities away from the farms are important to the family budget providing a means of extra income. This often includes men’s long term migration to Russia to find work.

2.3 Fotos da tecnologia

2.5 País/região/locais onde a tecnologia foi aplicada e que estão cobertos nesta avaliação

País:

Tajiquistão

Região/Estado/Província:

Tajikistan, Khatlon

Especificação adicional de localização:

Baljuvon, Khirob

Comentários:

Boundary points of the Technology area: North - 38.284233°N 69.639420°E
South - 38.278485°N 69.639555°E
East - 38.281854°N 69.641276°E
South - 38.281250°N 69.638009°E

2.6 Data da implementação

Caso o ano exato seja desconhecido, indique a data aproximada:
  • menos de 10 anos atrás (recentemente)

2.7 Introdução da tecnologia

Especifique como a tecnologia foi introduzida:
  • através de projetos/intervenções externas

3. Classificação da tecnologia de GST

3.2 Tipo(s) atualizado(s) de uso da terra onde a tecnologia foi aplicada

Terra de cultivo

Terra de cultivo

  • Cultura anual
  • Cultura perene (não lenhosa)
Pastagem

Pastagem

Pastagem extensiva:
  • Nomadismo
  • Seminomadismo/pastoralismo
Pastagem intensiva/produção de forragem:
  • Semiestabulação/sem pastagem
Comentários:

Major land use problems (compiler’s opinion): Implementation of land tenure rights at a local level was also a major barrier.

Major land use problems (land users’ perception): There is a soil and water conservation project in place to manage water runoff, soil erosion and gully formation. Low land productivity only allows for wheat production with long fallow periods. Improper pasture management has led to overall overgrazing.

Nomadism: animals taken to summer pastures

Semi-nomadism / pastoralism: animal graze around villages

Ranching: no practice

Cut-and-carry/ zero grazing: almost extinct

Improved pasture: no practice at all

Clear felling of (semi-)natural forests: No selection in times of electricity cuts in winter season.

Forest products and services: timber, fuelwood, fruits and nuts, grazing / browsing, other forest products / uses (honey, medical, etc.), nature conservation / protection

Future (final) land use (after implementation of SLM Technology): Mixed: Mf: Agroforestry

Constraints of infrastructure network (roads, railways, pipe lines, power lines): no irrigation network, heavy transports costs

Caso o uso da terra tenha mudado devido a implementação da tecnologia, indique seu uso anterior à implementação da tecnologia:

Grazing land: Ge: Extensive grazing land

3.3 Mais informações sobre o uso da terra

Comentários:

Water supply: rainfed, mixed rainfed - irrigated, rainfed

Water supply: post-flooding

post-flooding

Número de estações de cultivo por ano:
  • 1
Especifique:

Longest growing period in days: 180Longest growing period from month to month: March - August

Densidade animal (se relevante):

50-100 LU /km2

3.5 Difusão da tecnologia

Comentários:

Total area covered by the SLM Technology is 0.112 m2.

The application of the SLM technology is planned for the whole micro watershed which has a total area of 0.112 km2. Currently it has been impemented in 0.07km2 of this watershed.

3.6 Medidas de GST contendo a tecnologia

Medidas agronômicas

Medidas agronômicas

  • A1: cobertura vegetal/do solo
Medidas vegetativas

Medidas vegetativas

  • V1: cobertura de árvores/arbustos
Medidas estruturais

Medidas estruturais

  • S1: Terraços
Medidas de gestão

Medidas de gestão

  • M1: Mudança no tipo de uso da terra
Comentários:

Main measures: agronomic measures, vegetative measures, structural measures, management measures

Type of agronomic measures: mixed cropping / intercropping, contour planting / strip cropping, mulching, legume inter-planting, manure / compost / residues, zero tillage / no-till, pits

Type of vegetative measures: aligned: -contour, aligned: -graded strips *<sup>3</sup>, aligned: -along boundary

3.7 Principais tipos de degradação da terra abordados pela tecnologia

Erosão do solo pela água

Erosão do solo pela água

  • Wt: Perda do solo superficial/erosão de superfície
  • Wg: Erosão por ravinas/ravinamento
Degradação biológica

Degradação biológica

  • Bc: redução da cobertura vegetal
Comentários:

Main causes of degradation: soil management (Tillage on steep slope >35%.), deforestation / removal of natural vegetation (incl. forest fires) (Natural tree and shrubs removed completely.), over-exploitation of vegetation for domestic use, overgrazing (Stocking rates do exceed the standards in multiple times), disturbance of water cycle (infiltration / runoff) (Run-off is induced by maximum removal of vegetation cover.), land tenure (Unclear land right situation induces irresponsible attitudes.), inputs and infrastructure: (roads, markets, distribution of water points, other, …) (Very limited infrastructure development, vital infrastructure points are a long distance away.)

Secondary causes of degradation: Heavy / extreme rainfall (intensity/amounts) (Induces gully formation and mass movement.), droughts (If vegetation is dry then less soil cover is provided.), other natural causes (avalanches, volcanic eruptions, mud flows, highly susceptible natural resources, extreme topography, etc.) specify (The gradient is over 30%.), population pressure (Large family sizes, and high growth rates causes increased need for food and living space in the area.), poverty / wealth (Very limited financial power to develop the land.), labour availability (Though cheap labour is available, it takes much effort to organise communities to work together for SLM activities.), education, access to knowledge and support services (Basic schooling of children, no state provided extension or training after school age.), war and conflicts (The after-effects of recent civil war still have some influence.), governance / institutional (Communist attitudes still persist, very slow institutional development.)

3.8 Redução, prevenção ou recuperação da degradação do solo

Comentários:

Main goals: prevention of land degradation

Secondary goals: mitigation / reduction of land degradation, rehabilitation / reclamation of denuded land

4. Especificações técnicas, implementação de atividades, entradas e custos

4.1 Desenho técnico da tecnologia

Autor:

Manuchehr Rakhmatdzhonov, 16, Firdavsi street, 734003 Dushanbe

4.2 Especificações técnicas/ explicações do desenho técnico

The drawing shows the contour ditches on a slope with a 25 - 30 % steepness. The gradient is 3-5%.
Vertically, the contour ditches are spaced at 5 m intervals. The upper left part of the drawing shows how the material on the slope will be removed in portions during the five years to create a levelled terrace. The ditches are planted with fruit trees, and strips of natural grass cover the space between the ditches. In the middle line of the strips in the bottom part of the plot the farmer has grown vegetables.

Location: Khirob village. Baljuvon/ Khatlon/ Tajikistan

Date: 06.05.2011

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: high (Specific knowledge needed in the issues of integrated watershed management and technology.)

Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate (Training needed in terms of technology, planning and implementation of activities.)

Main technical functions: control of dispersed runoff: retain / trap, reduction of slope angle, increase of infiltration, promotion of vegetation species and varieties (quality, eg palatable fodder)

Secondary technical functions: control of dispersed runoff: impede / retard, improvement of ground cover, increase of surface roughness, improvement of topsoil structure (compaction), stabilisation of soil (eg by tree roots against land slides), increase / maintain water stored in soil, water harvesting / increase water supply, water spreading, increase of biomass (quantity), spatial arrangement and diversification of land use

Mixed cropping / intercropping
Material/ species: Growing a few tomatoes and paprica on the bottom strips.
Quantity/ density: 4plants m2
Remarks: Down slope alongside the ditches.

Contour planting / strip cropping
Material/ species: Wild vegetation is left to grow.
Quantity/ density: very dense
Remarks: Over 9 species counted on the plot all palatable, cut for hay and mulch.

Mulching
Material/ species: Mulching from natural grass, over 9 species.
Remarks: Ditches and trees covered beneath.

Legume inter-planting
Quantity/ density: 2 raisers.
Remarks: As a test to cover raiser surface.

Manure / compost / residues
Material/ species: Cattle dung suspended in water.
Quantity/ density: Once.
Remarks: Applied while planting the trees.

Zero tillage / no-till
Material/ species: No tillage for intercropping completed.

Pits
Material/ species: Pits were dug to plant seedlings.

Aligned: -contour
Vegetative material: T : trees / shrubs
Number of plants per (ha): 400
Vertical interval between rows / strips / blocks (m): 5
Spacing between rows / strips / blocks (m): 5
Vertical interval within rows / strips / blocks (m): 5
Width within rows / strips / blocks (m): 5

Aligned: -graded strips
Vegetative material: G : grass
Number of plants per (ha): na
Vertical interval between rows / strips / blocks (m): 1
Spacing between rows / strips / blocks (m): 3

Aligned: -along boundary
Vegetative material: T : trees / shrubs
Number of plants per (ha): 400
Spacing between rows / strips / blocks (m): 1

Trees/ shrubs species: Ailantus, Acacia, dog rose, willow, poplar

Fruit trees / shrubs species: Apple, grape, pear, apricot, cherry, pomegranate, mulberry, walnut

Perennial crops species: little alfalfa and espercet

Grass species: 9 naturally growing species

Slope (which determines the spacing indicated above): 30.00%

Gradient along the rows / strips: 25.00%

Retention/infiltration ditch/pit, sediment/sand trap
Vertical interval between structures (m): 5
Spacing between structures (m): 5
Depth of ditches/pits/dams (m): 0.3
Width of ditches/pits/dams (m): 0.25
Height of bunds/banks/others (m): 0.15
Width of bunds/banks/others (m): 0.25

Terrace: bench level
Vertical interval between structures (m): 3.50-3.80
Height of bunds/banks/others (m): 0.25
Width of bunds/banks/others (m): 1.20-1.50

Construction material (earth): the earth is removed upslope and added downslope to the front bank (raiser)

Slope (which determines the spacing indicated above): 25-30%

Lateral gradient along the structure: 3-5%

Vegetation is used for stabilisation of structures.

Change of land use type: Communal pasture land was turned into an agroforestry system

Change of land use practices / intensity level: Self subsistance, market orientated agroforestry system

Layout change according to natural and human environment: Along the contour lines of the slope

Major change in timing of activities: Major seasonal activities in three seasons: spring agronomic and vegetative measures, summer and autumn yield harvesting, clearing the branches

4.3 Informação geral em relação ao cálculo de entradas e custos

Outro/moeda nacional (especifique):

Somoni

Indique a taxa cambial do dólar norte americano para a moeda local (se relevante): 1 USD =:

4,5

Indique a média salarial da mão-de-obra contratada por dia:

5.00

4.4 Atividades de implantação

Atividade Tipo de medida Periodicidade
1. Planting seedlings in contour ditches Vegetativo February-March
2. Planting seedlings and bushes along the perimeter Vegetativo March
3. Cost of seedlings: frutiouse and firewood trees Vegetativo February -March
4. Gradual terracing by Broadening the ditch onslope and extending the raiser downslope Estrutural every spring during 5 years
5. Membership fees Gestão
6. Attending the training Gestão
7. Management of staff Gestão
8. Taxes Gestão
9. Taxes Gestão
10. Membership fees Gestão

4.5 Custos e entradas necessárias para a implantação

Especifique a entrada Unidade Quantidade Custos por unidade Custos totais por entrada % dos custos arcados pelos usuários da terra
Mão-de-obra labour 80,0 355,0 28400,0 50,0
Material vegetal mulching 5,0 66,0 330,0 100,0
Material vegetal a wood frame 5,0 3,0 15,0 100,0
Material vegetal tools 15,0 4,5 67,5 100,0
Custos totais para a implantação da tecnologia 28812,5

4.6 Atividades recorrentes/manutenção

Atividade Tipo de medida Periodicidade/frequência
1. Drip irrigation with plastic bottles Agronômico first 3 years
2. Mulching Agronômico once a year
3. Shaping the trees, cutting branches Vegetativo Autumn
4. Shaping the trees, cutting branches Vegetativo Autumn
5. Grafting Vegetativo March
6. Grafting Vegetativo March
7. Manuring Vegetativo March

4.7 Custos e entradas necessárias pata a manutenção/atividades recorrentes (por ano)

Especifique a entrada Unidade Quantidade Custos por unidade Custos totais por entrada % dos custos arcados pelos usuários da terra
Material vegetal mulching person/day 5,0 22,0 110,0 100,0
Outros drip irrigation with plastic bottles pers/day 15,0 66,6 999,0
Custos totais para a manutenção da tecnologia 1109,0
Comentários:

Labour costs apply to the cultivation of the whole 7ha plot.

4.8 Fatores mais importantes que afetam os custos

Descreva os fatores mais determinantes que afetam os custos:

The most affecting factors were the high cost inputs for construction material which usually has to be imported into the area: Fuel, metal nets for fencing, cement, etc.

5. Ambiente natural e humano

5.1 Clima

Precipitação pluviométrica anual
  • <250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1.000 mm
  • 1.001-1.500 mm
  • 1.501-2.000 mm
  • 2.001-3.000 mm
  • 3.001-4.000 mm
  • > 4.000 mm
Especificações/comentários sobre a pluviosidade:

Summer, >120 dry days

250-500 mm
Late summer, late autumn, rain prevails until the late autumn

500-750 mm
Late autumn mid spring, rain, snow.

750-1000 mm
avarage annual, usually up to 800mm

1000-1500 mm
not often, 1000mm heppen in single years

Zona agroclimática
  • Semiárido

Thermal climate class: temperate. winters with possible extreme cold, warm summers, with hot spells in July August

5.2 Topografia

Declividade média:
  • Plano (0-2%)
  • Suave ondulado (3-5%)
  • Ondulado (6-10%)
  • Moderadamente ondulado (11-15%)
  • Forte ondulado (16-30%)
  • Montanhoso (31-60%)
  • Escarpado (>60%)
Formas de relevo:
  • Planalto/planície
  • Cumes
  • Encosta de serra
  • Encosta de morro
  • Sopés
  • Fundos de vale
Zona de altitude:
  • 0-100 m s.n.m.
  • 101-500 m s.n.m.
  • 501-1.000 m s.n.m.
  • 1.001-1.500 m s.n.m.
  • 1.501-2.000 m s.n.m.
  • 2.001-2.500 m s.n.m.
  • 2.501-3.000 m s.n.m.
  • 3.001-4.000 m s.n.m.
  • > 4.000 m s.n.m.
Indique se a tecnologia é aplicada especificamente em:
  • Não relevante
Comentários e outras especificações sobre a topografia:

hilly area, located on the foot of Vakhsh mountain range; micro watersheds feeding the bigger watershed of the Kyzylsu river

5.3 Solos

Profundidade do solo em média:
  • Muito raso (0-20 cm)
  • Raso (21-50 cm)
  • Moderadamente profundo (51-80 cm)
  • Profundo (81-120 cm)
  • Muito profundo (>120 cm)
Textura do solo (solo superficial):
  • Médio (limoso, siltoso)
Matéria orgânica do solo superficial:
  • Médio (1-3%)
  • Baixo (<1%)

5.4 Disponibilidade e qualidade de água

Lençol freático:

5-50 m

Disponibilidade de água de superfície:

Médio

Qualidade da água (não tratada):

apenas para uso agrícola (irrigação)

5.5 Biodiversidade

Diversidade de espécies:
  • Médio

5.6 Características dos usuários da terra que utilizam a tecnologia

Rendimento não agrícola:
  • 10-50% de toda renda
Nível relativo de riqueza:
  • Muito pobre
  • Pobre
Indivíduos ou grupos:
  • Indivíduo/unidade familiar
Gênero:
  • Homens
Indique outras características relevantes dos usuários da terra:

Land users applying the Technology are mainly common / average land users

Difference in the involvement of women and men: Very few women are trusted to run a farm or make decisions about land use. Usually women have taken leading roles only if the men leave the family for long term migration, or have died. Only 8 women in the whole district are farm owners out of the total of 350 existing farms.
Women's involvement and level of freedom given to them are influenced by existing patriarchal values, and in many areas women often remain unaware of their rights.

Population density: 10-50 persons/km2

Annual population growth: 1% - 2%

3% of the land users are very rich and own 20% of the land.
5% of the land users are rich and own 10% of the land.
10% of the land users are average wealthy and own 40% of the land.
60% of the land users are poor and own 20% of the land.
22% of the land users are poor and own 10% of the land.

Off-farm income specification: Complemented by salary from state job, NGO activity, transport service and construction work in capital town and other regions, labour migration to Russia.

Market orientation of production system: subsistence (self-supply), subsistence (self-supply), subsistence (self-supply), mixed (subsistence/ commercial, mixed (subsistence/ commercial, commercial/ market

5.7 Média da área de terra própria ou arrendada por usuários da terra que utilizam a tecnologia

  • < 0,5 ha
  • 0,5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1.000 ha
  • 1.000-10.000 ha
  • > 10.000 ha
É considerado pequena, média ou grande escala (referente ao contexto local)?
  • Pequena escala
Comentários:

Average area of land owned or leased by land users applying the Technology: < 0.5 ha, 0.5-1 ha, 1-2 ha, 2-5 ha, 5-15 ha, 5-15 ha, 15-50 ha

5.8 Propriedade de terra, direitos de uso da terra e de uso da água

Propriedade da terra:
  • Estado

5.9 Acesso a serviços e infraestrutura

Saúde:
  • Pobre
  • Moderado
  • Bom
Educação:
  • Pobre
  • Moderado
  • Bom
Assistência técnica:
  • Pobre
  • Moderado
  • Bom
Emprego (p. ex. não agrícola):
  • Pobre
  • Moderado
  • Bom
Mercados:
  • Pobre
  • Moderado
  • Bom
Energia:
  • Pobre
  • Moderado
  • Bom
Vias e transporte:
  • Pobre
  • Moderado
  • Bom
Água potável e saneamento:
  • Pobre
  • Moderado
  • Bom
Serviços financeiros:
  • Pobre
  • Moderado
  • Bom

6. Impactos e declarações finais

6.1 Impactos no local mostrados pela tecnologia

Impactos socioeconômicos

Produção

Produção de forragens

diminuído
aumentado
Quantidade anterior à GST:

very little fodder could be collected

Quantidade posterior à GST:

cut and carry fodder production

Qualidade da forragem

diminuído
aumentado

Produção animal

diminuído
aumentado

Produção de madeira

diminuído
aumentado
Quantidade anterior à GST:

not possible

Quantidade posterior à GST:

may cover 40 -50 percent of HH need only in 5 year

Risco de falha de produção

aumentado
diminuído
Quantidade anterior à GST:

no

Quantidade posterior à GST:

yes

Diversidade de produtos

diminuído
aumentado
Quantidade posterior à GST:

yes

Área de produção

diminuído
aumentado
Quantidade anterior à GST:

no

Quantidade posterior à GST:

yes

Gestão de terra

Impedido
Simplificado
Quantidade posterior à GST:

yes

Geração de energia

diminuído
aumentado
Renda e custos

Rendimento agrícola

diminuído
aumentado
Quantidade anterior à GST:

no

Quantidade posterior à GST:

yes

Diversidade de fontes de rendimento

diminuído
aumentado
Quantidade anterior à GST:

no

Quantidade posterior à GST:

yes

Carga de trabalho

aumentado
diminuído

Impactos socioculturais

Segurança alimentar/auto-suficiência

Reduzido
Melhorado

Estado de saúde

Agravado
Melhorado

Oportunidades de lazer

Reduzido
Melhorado

Instituições comunitárias

Enfraquecido
Fortalecido

Instituições nacionais

Enfraquecido
Fortalecido

Conhecimento de GST/ degradação da terra

Reduzido
Melhorado

Impactos ecológicos

Ciclo hídrico/escoamento

Escoamento superficial

aumentado
diminuído

Evaporação

aumentado
diminuído
Solo

Umidade do solo

diminuído
aumentado

Cobertura do solo

Reduzido
Melhorado

Perda de solo

aumentado
diminuído

Compactação do solo

aumentado
Reduzido
Biodiversidade: vegetação, animais

Biomassa/carbono acima do solo

diminuído
aumentado

Diversidade vegetal

diminuído
aumentado

Controle de praga/doença

diminuído
aumentado
Clima e redução de riscos de desastre

Emissão de carbono e gases de efeito estufa

aumentado
diminuído

Risco de incêndio

aumentado
diminuído

Velocidade do vento

aumentado
diminuído

6.2 Impactos externos mostrados pela tecnologia

Cheias de jusante

aumentado
Reduzido

Capacidade de tamponamento/filtragem

Reduzido
Melhorado

Sedimentos transportados pelo vento

aumentado
Reduzido

Danos em áreas vizinhas

aumentado
Reduzido

6.3 Exposição e sensibilidade da tecnologia às mudanças climáticas graduais e extremos/desastres relacionados ao clima (conforme o ponto de vista dos usuários da terra)

Mudança climática gradual

Mudança climática gradual
Estação do ano Tipo de mudança climática/extremo Como a tecnologia lida com isso?
Temperatura anual aumento não bem

Extremos (desastres) relacionados ao clima

Desastres meteorológicos
Como a tecnologia lida com isso?
Temporal local não bem
Tempestade de vento local bem
Desastres climatológicos
Como a tecnologia lida com isso?
Seca não bem
Desastres hidrológicos
Como a tecnologia lida com isso?
Inundação geral (rio) bem

Outras consequências relacionadas ao clima

Outras consequências relacionadas ao clima
Como a tecnologia lida com isso?
Período de crescimento reduzido bem

6.4 Análise do custo-benefício

Como os benefícios se comparam aos custos de implantação (do ponto de vista dos usuários da terra)?
Retornos a curto prazo:

levemente negativo

Retornos a longo prazo:

positivo

Como os benefícios se comparam aos custos recorrentes/de manutenção(do ponto de vista dos usuários da terra)?
Retornos a curto prazo:

levemente negativo

Retornos a longo prazo:

positivo

6.5 Adoção da tecnologia

Comentários:

100% of land user families have adopted the Technology with external material support

4 land user families have adopted the Technology with external material support

Comments on acceptance with external material support: Project subsidised only 50% of material inputs.

Comments on adoption trend: Metal for the net was costly- farmers had to convince the project to subsidise prior to adoption, otherwise would reject adopting (area has high risk of crop damage- high livestock density, grazing not controlled).
Year following implementation: 3 farmers in neighbourhood have adopted on own funds; much more are willing to adopt, but need external support

6.7 Pontos fortes/vantagens/oportunidades da tecnologia

Pontos fortes/vantagens/oportunidades na visão do usuário da terra
It helped to acquire more land user rights.
Land users feel they have an increased status in local society.
It has good potential for replication in other areas.

How can they be sustained / enhanced? It would be better if the more expensive parts of the input were subsidised.
Good long term perspectives for improvement of livelihoods.
It allows a positive long term change in household provision regarding food, employment and energy sources, allowing more spare time for cultural events and education.
Pontos fortes/vantagens/oportunidades na visão do compilador ou de outra pessoa capacitada
It made possible the change to more sustainable land management techniques.
The technology is well suited to the sloping landscape and is easy to adopt.
The technology allows the use of locally available materials, and has low maintenance costs.
It fits well to the local needs for land reclamation and conservation, and sits within the legislative frameworks.

How can they be sustained / enhanced? There has been a recent state decree to encourage promotion of orchard development.
It has a positive effect on the areas downstream.

How can they be sustained / enhanced? Prior to implementation of the technology, areas downstream were often were damaged by floods.

6.8 Pontos fracos, desvantagens/riscos da tecnologia e formas de superá-los

Pontos fracos/desvantagens/riscos na visão do usuário da terra Como eles podem ser superados?
It needed some immediate on-site adjustments when structuring the half moon cuttings in the contour ditches. The farmer's opinion should be considered during the adoption of the technology, and to assist with any changes made.
It caused some disagreements between the farmers and the consultant over what part of the material input should be subsidised. The consultant should try to ensure they understand the social and economic factors affecting the locals.
Pontos fracos/vantagens/riscos na visão do compilador ou de outra pessoa capacitada Como eles podem ser superados?
Needs more until the final structure is finished This depends on the length and intensity of any precipitation/drought/dry spells etc.
It is a new technology in this area so will need some time to be proven effective.
External knowledge is needed for the establishment and maintainance of the technology.
Extra workers are needed for the complementary drip irrigation - child labour is often used for this.

7. Referências e links

7.2 Referências às publicações disponíveis

Título, autor, ano, ISBN:

Scetch map of Khirob Microwatershed

Disponível de onde? Custos?

DWHH Baljuvon Office

Título, autor, ano, ISBN:

Interim Narrative Report 01.05.2009-30.04.2010 Project TAJ 1068

Disponível de onde? Custos?

DWHH Baljuvon Office

Título, autor, ano, ISBN:

Grant Application Form to EU Commision: "Individual incomes & Improving Living Standards in Khatlon and Sughd Regions", Tajikistan

Disponível de onde? Custos?

DWHH Regional Office, Dushanbe mail to:

Módulos