1.2 Контактные данные специалистов и организаций, участвующих в описании и оценке Подхода

Название проекта, содействовавшего документированию/оценке Подхода (если применимо)

Danajon Communities WATCH ( DCW)

Название организации (-ий), содействовавших документированию/оценке Подхода (если применимо)

Philippine Partnership for the Development of Human Resoruces in Rural Areasy (PhilDHRRA) - Филиппины

1.3 Условия, регламентирующие использование собранных ВОКАТ данных

Когда были собраны данные (на местах)?

04/04/2017

Составитель и ответственный/-ые специалист(-ы) согласны с условиями, регламентирующими использование собранных ВОКАТ данных:

Да

1.4 Ссылка (-и) на Анкету (-ы) по Технологиям УЗП

2.1 Краткое описание Подхода

Social Enterprise (SE) aimed to provide social protection among its members and generate additional family income. Above all, this approach will encourage the conservation, preservation and protection of the resources available in the community.

2.2 Подробное описание Подхода

Подробное описание Подхода:

Social Enterprise (SE) materialized because of the experiential processes conducted by the Sustainable Livelihood Officer. According to him, livelihood intervention should achieve the advocacy of the project, at the same time, relevant and suitable to the people living in the island and coastal communities. SE Approach was a result of the focus group discussions conducted in the community and livelihood consultations of the different stakeholders in the barangay level. According to the Local Government Code of the Philippines, Book III, Section 386 (a), A Barangay maybe created out of a contiguous territory which has a population of at least two thousand (2,000) inhabitants as certified by the National Statistics Office. Furthermore, Section 386 states that barangay is the basic political unit. It serves as the primary planning and implementing unit of government policies, plans, programs, projects, and
activities in the community, and as a forum wherein the collective views of the people may be expressed, crystallized and considered, and where disputes may be amicably settled.

Social Enterprise Project was determined using the following methods: resource mapping, identification of social enterprise project, planning and preparation which includes community equity fund, implementation, maintenance and monitoring, lastly, expansion and/or diversification of the implemented project. Once the enterprise is established, the organization will elect the members of their business management team. This is different from the set of officers typically present in every organization because business management team will focus on the business engagements only. The business management team is headed by the business manger, who will report directly to the president of the organization. The members of the team includes the following: treasurer, bookkeeper, purchaser and marketing team (if needed by the enterprise project).

The management team will receive 20% of the net income. Afterwards, the remaining net income will be divided according to the following percentage: 10% for disaster fund allocation, 10-20% for additional capital, and the remaining amount is allocated for individual member share. SE does not only focus on net profit but also the welfare of the community, its resources and social protection among its members. Social protection specifically means having disaster fund allocation per organization which is derived from the net income of the enterprise. This fund can be utilized by the organization before or after the onset of a disaster, depending on their agreed utilization guidelines. The sustainability components are the following: allocation for additional capital, depreciation cost for every equipment and experiential mentoring of the Livelihood Officer.

Based from the baseline study of DCW Project, Human Trafficking cases increased after a disaster. DCW project aimed to build resilient communities in order to combat Human Trafficking, however, conducting awareness sessions, coordination meetings with the local government unit and establishing HT referral system is not enough to prevent Human Trafficking. On the second year of the project, the project management team realized that livelihood component is the missing link in fighting against Human Trafficking. The body agreed that sustainable livelihood project means being adaptable and resilient to climate change. For the livelihood officer, group enterprise is an important mechanism in promoting adaptable and resilient livelihood project. This approach was granted to the People's Organization (PO) in the barangays who were organized or adopted by DCW project.

Due to the awareness sessions conducted, the organizations were motivated to join the advocacy activities like coastal clean-up and mangrove planting. They were also invited to join forums on the Solid Waste Management (SWM), referral pathway on Human Trafficking (HT) and awareness training on the causes and effects of Climate Change and sea level rise, since they are living in the island and coastal barangays. PO organizations serve as community partners of DCW project in facilitating learning sessions in the different barangays. Furthermore, DCW project provided inputs how to make their enterprise resilient and sustainable by being adaptive to the changing weather especially those organizations living in the island barangays.

2.3 Фотографии, иллюстрирующие Подход

2.5 Страна/ регион/ место, где применялся Подход

2.6 Даты начала и окончания реализации Подхода

2.7 Тип Подхода

• в рамках проекта/ программы

2.8 Каковы цели/ задачи Подхода

Social Enterprise (SE) aimed to provide social protection among its members and generate additional family income. Above all, this approach will encourage the conservation, preservation and protection of the resources available in the community.

2.9 Условия содействующие применению Технологии/ Технологий в рамках Подхода или затрудняющие его

3.1 Заинтересованные стороны, участвующие в реализации Подхода и их роли

3.2 Участие местных землепользователей/ местных сообществ на разных стадиях реализации Подхода

	Участие местных землепользователей/ местных сообществ	Перечислите участников и опишите их вовлеченность
инициирование/ мотивация	интерактивное	PO members, Sustainable Livelihood Officer, Field Officers, Area Supervisors and representative of the barangay council. Activity: FGD, resource mapping, consultations and assessment of the organizations capability in handling social enterprise project.
планирование	интерактивное	PO members, Sustainable Livelihood Officer, Field Officers, Area Supervisors and representative of the barangay council
выполнение	самоорганизация	PO members, Sustainable Livelihood Officer, Field Officers and Area Supervisors
мониторинг/ оценка	самоорганизация	PO members, Sustainable Livelihood Officer and Field Officers

3.3 Схема реализации (если имеется)

3.4 Принятие решений по выбору Технологии/ Технологий УЗП

Укажите, кто принимал решение по выбору применяемой Технологии/ Технологий:

• все участники как часть процесса совместных действий

Поясните:

Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and livelihood consultations in the barangay level were conducted by the livelihood officer in order to achieve a feasible and suitable Social Enterprise project specific for their community. After leveling off and the exchange of ideas based from their previous experience vis-a-vi the current trend of the weather patterns and climate change, the organization finally arrived to a conclusion and implement their desired social enterprise project.

Поясните на чём было основано принятие решений:

• личный опыт и мнения (незадокументированные)

4.1 Повышение компетенций/ обучение

Проводилось ли обучение землепользователей/ других заинтересованных лиц?

Да

Укажите, кто проходил обучение:

• землепользователи

Тип обучения:

• опытные участки

Тип обучения:

• On-site coaching and mentoring

Рассматриваемые темы:

1) Technical Assistance in drafting proposals and lobbying
2) Financial Recording and Bookkeeping
3) Value Chain Analysis
4) Enterprise Development
5) Occupational Health and Health Standards

4.2 Консультационные услуги

Есть ли у землепользователей возможность получать консультации?

Да

Укажите, где именно оказываются консультационные услуги:

• на полях землепользователей

4.3 Институциональная (организационная) поддержка

В ходе реализации Подхода были ли организованы новые институциональные структуры или поддержаны уже существующие?

• да, умеренно

Укажите уровень, на котором структуры были укреплены или вновь созданы:

• местные

Опишите организацию, функции и ответственность, членство и т.д.

Some of the members of the organization are capacitated to become local champions. Local champions means they have the ability to facilitate learning sessions, actively involved in organizational activities and empowered enough to link and lobby with the different line agencies. While the leaders of the organization are trained to manage their organizations and social enterprise.

Укажите тип поддержки:

• финансовая
• повышение компетенций/ обучение

• Seed Capital worth Php30,000

4.4 Мониторинг и оценка

Являются ли мониторинг и оценка частью Подхода?

Да

Если да, будет ли данный документ использоваться для мониторинга и оценки?

Нет

4.5 Научные исследования

Были ли научные исследования частью Подхода?

Нет

5.1 Годовой бюджет мероприятий по УЗП в рамках Подхода

Если точный годовой бюжет неизвестен, укажите примерный диапазон затрат:

• 2000-10000

Комментарий (например, основные источники финансирования/ ключевые доноры):

DCW Project is funded by Caritas Switzerland and JTIF

5.2 Финансирование и внешняя материальная поддержка, предоставляемая землепользователям

Предоставлялась ли землепользователям финансовая/ материальная поддержка для применения Технологии /Технологий?

Нет

5.3 Субсидии на отдельные затраты (включая оплату труда)

• нет

Если труд землепользователя был существенным вкладом, укажите, был ли этот вклад:

• добровольный

5.4 Кредитование

Предоставлялись ли в рамках Подхода кредиты на мероприятия УЗП?

Нет

5.5 Другие методы или инструменты стимулирования

Использовались ли другие методы или инструменты стимулирования для продвижения Технологий УЗП?

Нет

6.1 Влияние Подхода

6.2 Основные причины, побуждающие землепользователей внедрять УЗП

6.3 Долгосрочная устойчивость мероприятий в рамках Подхода

Могут ли землепользователи самостоятельно (без внешней поддержки) продолжать применение того, что было реализовано в рамках Подхода?

• нет уверенности

Если нет или нет уверенности, объясните почему:

Because the dynamics within the organization is a vital factor in sustainability. The role of a second liner of the key positions and business management team is crucial as well since they are involve in the technical support and business processes.

6.4 Сильные стороны/ преимущества Подхода

Сильные стороны/ преимущества/ возможности по мнению землепользователей
This is not an individualistic approach but a group effort in order to revive the "bayanihan" spirit (spirit of communal unity, work and cooperation to achieve a particular goal) and social awareness.
The People's Organization (PO) members underwent training like financial management, Value Chain Analysis (VCA), Occupational Safety and Health Standards (OSHS). What made this approach different from their previous livelihood projects is that, the PO were guided from planning to implementation and monitored on a monthly basis to ensure the continuity of their business engagement. Also, there were mentoring and coaching sessions provided by the livelihood officer and consultant on financial recording and bookkeeping.
The PO learned that it is not only about the quality of output, rather, the quality starting from its source to production and marketing. Moreover, its impact on their environment and community.

Сильные стороны/ преимущества/ возможности по мнению составителя или других ключевых специалистов
This approach will not only focus on profit but also on environmental protection, conservation and preservation.
Increase fish production because it will lessen the pressure of their usual fishing ground and minimize over fishing.
Alternative source of income to the fishers especially if there's gale warning and typhoons.

6.5 Слабые стороны/ недостатки Подхода и пути их преодоления

Слабые стороны/ недостатки/ риски по мнению землепользователей	Возможные пути их преодоления/снижения?
Turn over of Business Management Team especially the bookkeeper position because it is time demanding and keen on details.	Choose a bookkeeper that is willing enough to follow through the records and no problem on his/her eye sight. Encourage and train second liner on the key positions. Provide honorarium to the business management team.
Security of tenure (land/sea) of their project site or production building.	To enter a Memoramdum of Agreement (MOA) between the local government units. Lobbying in the local government unit to pass a resolution allowing the PO to use the land/sea as project site or production building.
Sustainability of the project even after DCW.	The project holder will enter a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the local government unit as partners of the community in sustaining their project. Provided technical skills training to the PO so that they can mange their enterprise even after DCW project. Ensure registration and accreditation of the POs in the different committees of the local government unit and different government agencies.

Слабые стороны/ недостатки/ риски по мнению составителя или ответственных специалистов	Возможные пути их преодоления/снижения?
2 years and 9 months is not enough to mold a strong and dynamic community-based social enterprise.	Linkage to the Local Government Unit (LGU) and the different line agencies like Department of Trade and Industries (DTI), Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) and Department of Science and Technology (DOST).
Upgrading of the People's Organization (PO) knowledge on production technology, marketing and product packaging.	Linkage to the different line agencies like Department of Trade and Industries (DTI), Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) and Department of Science and Technology (DOST) because they have the expertise to support the needs of the PO. For example, DTI for marketing and linkage and DOST for product development.
Capacity to access funds from the different line agencies and fund donors.	Train the PO to conceptualize a project based from their needs, write project proposals and submit it to the concern agencies for funding.

7.1 Методы сбора/источники информации