1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Technology

Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)

1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT

The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:

Yes

2.1 Short description of the Technology

Definition of the Technology:

Structure constructed by digging a shallow channel on the upper hill side and putting the excavated soil on the down side to build the embankment

2.2 Detailed description of the Technology

Description:

A structure constructed across the slope along the contour with earth. The embankment is stablized with grasses which is planted during rainy season. Construction is made in groups or by individual farmer, with or without incentives.

Purpose of the Technology: It reduces soil erosion, drain excess runoff during heavy storm which would cause over flow on the land and reduce runoff velocity. Grasses planted on the enbankment for stabilization can solve the animal feed and also soil deposited behind the bund can improve the fertility status of the soil.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: Bunds are continuously repaired during and after heavy storm especially in the first two years after construction. Grasses and tree plant species are planted on the enbankment in order to stablize the structure. Cut and curry and cntroled grazing is common on the embankment.

Natural / human environment: Reduce soil erosion, enhance vegetation growth, improve the beauty of the land scape

2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment

Country:

Ethiopia

Region/ State/ Province:

SNNPR

Further specification of location:

Boreda

Specify the spread of the Technology:

• evenly spread over an area

If precise area is not known, indicate approximate area covered:

• 10-100 km2

Comments:

Total area covered by the SLM Technology is 18.29 km2.

scattered SWC activities wrere made in all peasent associations but the above mentioned peasent associations are the dominant once

Map

×

2.6 Date of implementation

If precise year is not known, indicate approximate date:

• less than 10 years ago (recently)

2.7 Introduction of the Technology

Specify how the Technology was introduced:

• through projects/ external interventions

3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied

Cropland

• Annual cropping
• Perennial (non-woody) cropping

Annual cropping - Specify crops:

• cereals - barley
• root/tuber crops - sweet potatoes, yams, taro/cocoyam, other

• wheat

• Enset, Desho grass

Number of growing seasons per year:

• 2

Specify:

Longest growing period in days: 180Longest growing period from month to month: Jun - JanSecond longest growing period in days: 120Second longest growing period from month to month: Mar - May

Comments:

Major land use problems (compiler’s opinion): cost of fertilizer, shortage of farm land and grazing land, cultivation of steep slopes

Major land use problems (land users’ perception): cost of fertilizer, shortage of farm land and low productivity

3.4 Water supply

Water supply for the land on which the Technology is applied:

• rainfed

3.5 SLM group to which the Technology belongs

• cross-slope measure

3.6 SLM measures comprising the Technology

vegetative measures

structural measures

• S2: Bunds, banks

Comments:

Secondary measures: vegetative measures

Type of vegetative measures: aligned: -contour

3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology

soil erosion by water

• Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
• Wg: gully erosion/ gullying

chemical soil deterioration

• Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)

Comments:

Main type of degradation addressed: Wt: loss of topsoil / surface erosion

Secondary types of degradation addressed: Wg: gully erosion / gullying, Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content

3.8 Prevention, reduction, or restoration of land degradation

Specify the goal of the Technology with regard to land degradation:

• reduce land degradation

4.1 Technical drawing of the Technology

Technical specifications (related to technical drawing):

SNNPR

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: high

Technical knowledge required for land users: high

Main technical functions: reduction of slope angle

Secondary technical functions: control of concentrated runoff: retain / trap, reduction of slope length, increase in soil fertility

Aligned: -contour
Vegetative material: G : grass

Grass species: Desho (it is local grass)

Slope (which determines the spacing indicated above): 19.00%

If the original slope has changed as a result of the Technology, the slope today is (see figure below): 9.00%

Gradient along the rows / strips: 0.00%

Bund/ bank: level
Vertical interval between structures (m): 0.8
Spacing between structures (m): 15
Depth of ditches/pits/dams (m): 0.5
Width of ditches/pits/dams (m): 0.6
Length of ditches/pits/dams (m): 62
Height of bunds/banks/others (m): 0.6
Width of bunds/banks/others (m): 0.5
Length of bunds/banks/others (m): 62

Bund/ bank: graded
Vertical interval between structures (m): 1
Spacing between structures (m): 13
Depth of ditches/pits/dams (m): 0.6
Width of ditches/pits/dams (m): 0.7
Length of ditches/pits/dams (m): 58
Height of bunds/banks/others (m): 0.65
Width of bunds/banks/others (m): 0.5
Length of bunds/banks/others (m): 60

Structural measure: bund/ bank: level
Vertical interval between structures (m): 1
Spacing between structures (m): 13
Depth of ditches/pits/dams (m): 0.6
Width of ditches/pits/dams (m): 0.7
Length of ditches/pits/dams (m): 58
Height of bunds/banks/others (m): 0.65
Width of bunds/banks/others (m): 0.5
Length of bunds/banks/others (m): 60

Construction material (earth): soils excavated from the ditch is used to build the enbankment

Slope (which determines the spacing indicated above): 15%

If the original slope has changed as a result of the Technology, the slope today is: 5%

Lateral gradient along the structure: 0%

For water harvesting: the ratio between the area where the harvested water is applied and the total area from which water is collected is: 1:11

Vegetation is used for stabilisation of structures.

4.2 General information regarding the calculation of inputs and costs

other/ national currency (specify):

Birr

If relevant, indicate exchange rate from USD to local currency (e.g. 1 USD = 79.9 Brazilian Real): 1 USD =:

8.5

4.3 Establishment activities

4.4 Costs and inputs needed for establishment

Comments:

Duration of establishment phase: 12 month(s)

4.5 Maintenance/ recurrent activities

4.6 Costs and inputs needed for maintenance/ recurrent activities (per year)

Comments:

the culculation is based on the length of the structures per hectar of land

4.7 Most important factors affecting the costs

Describe the most determinate factors affecting the costs:

slope

5.1 Climate

5.2 Topography

Comments and further specifications on topography:

Landforms: Hill slopes. Also ridges and plateau/plains
Slopes on average: Hilly. Also moderate and rolling

5.3 Soils

If available, attach full soil description or specify the available information, e.g. soil type, soil PH/ acidity, Cation Exchange Capacity, nitrogen, salinity etc.

Soil fertility is low-medium
Soil drainage/infiltration is medium-poor
Soil water storage capacity is medium-high

5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Indicate other relevant characteristics of the land users:

Population density: 50-100 persons/km2
Annual population growth: 1% - 2%
1% of the land users are rich and own 3% of the land.
39% of the land users are average wealthy and own 72% of the land.
60% of the land users are poor and own 25% of the land.
Level of mechanization: Manual labour (hand tools) and animal traction (oxen)

5.7 Average area of land used by land users applying the Technology

6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown

Socio-economic impacts

Production

Income and costs

Socio-cultural impacts

Ecological impacts

Water cycle/ runoff

Soil

Other ecological impacts

6.2 Off-site impacts the Technology has shown

6.4 Cost-benefit analysis

How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?

How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?

6.5 Adoption of the Technology

Comments:

62% of land user families have adopted the Technology with external material support

1367 land user families have adopted the Technology with external material support

Comments on acceptance with external material support: estimates

30% of land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support

721 land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support

Comments on spontaneous adoption: estimates

There is a little trend towards spontaneous adoption of the Technology

Comments on adoption trend: the posetive results of the conserved land attracts some the farmes to applythe technique by themselves without and external support

6.7 Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities of the Technology

6.8 Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks of the Technology and ways of overcoming them