方法

Incentive Based Local Level Participatory Planning Approach [埃塞俄比亚]

approaches_2384 - 埃塞俄比亚

完整性: 75%

1. 一般信息

1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

关键资源人员

SLM专业人员:
有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称(如相关)
Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (DEZA / COSUDE / DDC / SDC) - 瑞士

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

1.4 SLM技术问卷的参考

Rehabilitation of degraded lands
technologies

Rehabilitation of degraded lands [埃塞俄比亚]

Activities that help maintain the productive potentials of soils through prevention and reduction of erosion, enhancing of rehabilitation rate by practicing measures such as microbasins, trench, eyebrow terrace, terraces, pitting and plantation of trees.

  • 编制者: Unknown User

2. SLM方法的描述

2.1 该方法的简要说明

The approach involves, the use of incentives to motivate particpation of communities in the planning and implementation of SWC activities which improve land productivity and income.

2.2 该方法的详细说明

该方法的详细说明:

Aims / objectives: The purpose is to tackle food shortages of the participating households in preventing and controlling soil erosion by conserving soil and water and through improving soil fertility, enhance the production and productivity of lands, which are aimed at improving the income of the communities and hence improving livlihoods. The specific objective of the approach is to enable each individual land user to be aware of land degradation problem and the use of SWC. . The approach includes discussion during general meetings on the concept, discussion of SWC specialist with community memebers, demonstration, and conducting training.

Stages of implementation: The stages of implementation include site selection, making participatory work plan, selection of participants, construction of structures and planting trees.

Role of stakeholders: Communities participate in palnning and management, implementation of the technology which consists of soil consrevation and stablizing of bunds by planting suitable plant species.

2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点

国家:

埃塞俄比亚

区域/州/省:

SNNPR

2.6 该方法的开始和终止日期

注明开始年份:

1991

2.7 方法的类型

  • 基于项目/方案

2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标

The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities (Infrastructure development, water harvesting, income generating)

To allviate the problem of food insecurity and to rehabilitate the degraded lands by involving the communities in planning and implementaion of SWC activities.

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: Land degradation, soil erosion, food insecurity and low soil fertility.

2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件

社会/文化/宗教规范和价值观
  • 阻碍

low participation of women due to religious reasons

Treatment through the SLM Approach: encourage women to do more SWC works by incentives

财务资源和服务的可用性/可得性
  • 阻碍

lack of hand tools and other operational costs

Treatment through the SLM Approach: provision of hand tools and alocate adequate finance

法律框架(土地使用权、土地和水使用权)
  • 启动

The existing land ownership, land use rights / water rights greatly helped the approach implementation: Land users understand that income generated from closure areas is of community, not of governement. This has encouraged the community to get more involved in conservation activities.

了解SLM,获得技术支持
  • 阻碍

Lack of knoweledge

Treatment through the SLM Approach: training, field visits and participatory involvement at all levels

3. 相关利益相关者的参与和角色

3.1 该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责

  • 地方政府
  • 国家政府(规划者、决策者)

The MERET project

  • 国际组织
如果涉及多个利益相关者,请注明领导机构:

The basic principles and steps for the methodology have been adopted from experience in other countries. This was adapted to local conditions with new elements added. National, regional and woreda specialists were involved in the process.

3.2 当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段
当地土地使用者/当地社区的参与 指定参与人员并描述活动
启动/动机 互动 Mainly:public meetings; partly: interviews/questionnaires; At this stage public meeting is important to change land users attitudes.
计划 互动 workshops/seminars, rapid/participatory rural appraisal
实施 外部支持 Mainly: responsibility for major steps; partly: responsibility for minor steps; Proirity is given to highly degraded areas for treatment.
监测/评估
Research

3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策

具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:
  • 主要是土地使用者,由SLM专家提供支持
解释:

During the community meatings land users choose the proper SWC technology. The SWC specialists give explanation on the importance/use of the technology.

Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by mainly by land users supported by SLM specialists. Eventhough land users can make decissions on the methods of implementing SWC technology, advise from SWC specialist is required.

4. 技术支持、能力建设和知识管理

4.1 能力建设/培训

是否为土地使用者/其他利益相关者提供培训?:

明确受训人员:
  • 土地使用者
  • SWC specialists (1), extensionists/trainers (3)
培训形式:
  • 在职
  • 示范区域
  • 公开会议
涵盖的主题:

Training on how to rehabilitate degraded lands by closing the area, laying out and constructing of physical and biological techniques to conserve soil and water and how to maintain them.

4.2 咨询服务

土地使用者有权使用咨询服务吗?:

指明是否提供了咨询服务:
  • 在土地使用者的土地上
说明/注释:

Name of method used for advisory service: Conventional extension package: Household package; Key elements: mass mobilization (regular extension package), group work (MERET), family labour (Household package); 1) Mainly: government's existing extension system, Partly: projects own extension structure and agent; Extension staff: mainly government employees 2) Target groups for extension: land users; Activities: implement soil and water conservation activites.

Advisory service is quite adequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; Awarness creation given to SWC specialists and land users, so that they will be able to practice SWC technologies. As a result, substantial amount of degraded land have been rehabilitated and made productive.

4.3 机构强化(组织发展)

是否通过这种方法建立或加强了机构?:
  • 是,少许
具体说明机构的强化或建立程度:
  • 本地
  • seedlings

4.4 监测和评估

监测和评估是该方法的一部分吗?:

注释:

There were few changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation: Following the recommendations made through the evaluation and monitoring work, some changes in the way technolologies and techniques have been applied could be changed / adjusted. Exmple: layout procedures standards, design and choice of techniques

4.5 研究

研究是该方法的一部分吗?

明确话题:
  • 技术
提供进一步的细节,并指出是谁做的研究:

Practicing, recording and reporting of activities, achievements and impacts have been part of the work. Hence observations and trials on technologies have enabled the project to screen best practices and management techniques.

Research was carried out on-farm

5. 融资和外部物质支持

5.1 该方法中SLM组成部分的年度预算

注释(例如主要的资助来源/主要捐助者):

Approach costs were met by the following donors: international (WFP): 80.0%; government (national): 20.0%

5.2 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援

土地使用者是否获得实施该技术的财政/物质支持?:

5.3 对特定投入的补贴(包括劳动力)

  • 设备
具体说明哪些投入得到了补贴 程度如何 对补贴做出具体说明
机械 部分融资 Motor cycles / transport facilities
工具 部分融资 Handtools
  • 农业
具体说明哪些投入得到了补贴 程度如何 对补贴做出具体说明
种子 部分融资
化肥 充分融资 Biocides
Seedlings 部分融资
  • 基建
具体说明哪些投入得到了补贴 程度如何 对补贴做出具体说明
Community infrastructure 部分融资
如果土地使用者的劳动力是一项重要的投入,那么是不是:
  • 以粮换工
注释:

community works 80% for food for work and 20% as voluntary contribution

5.4 信用

是否根据SLM活动的方法给予信用值?:

6. 影响分析和结论性陈述

6.1 方法的影响

该方法是否帮助土地使用者实施和维护SLM技术?:
  • 是,很少
  • 是,中等
  • 是,支持力度很大

protection of soil erosion by improved methods, water is conserved in the soil by microbasins, flood hazard decreased by combined measures and soil fertility is increased using compost.

该方法是否改善了阻碍SLM技术实施的土地使用权/用户权问题?:
  • 是,很少
  • 是,中等
  • 是,支持力度很大

The approach has promoted the sense of user rights of land users on assets /developments created/made such as the communiy forests, grass, terraced fields etc and they are aware that they are the ones to decide on the use of the assets developed.

Did other land users / projects adopt the Approach?
  • 是,很少
  • 是,中等
  • 是,支持力度很大

Land users have greatly adopted the methods and procedures of LLPPA to all development plans at villages, communities and Kebele levels. Similarly, many NGOs and government organizations have been using the LLPPA.

6.3 方法活动的可持续性

土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施(无外部支持的情况下)?:
  • 不确定
若否或不确定,请具体说明并予以注释:

There are different types of supports: without specialists, technical support it is most unlikely that they will continue specially on communal lands. Without incentives the approach could be continued on individual land holdings as well as on communal lands, but there could be some communities who without food support may not be able to support their livelihoods until they create their own assets

6.4 该方法的长处/优点

土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会
Avoid individual contribution for different social works. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Improve the production per unit area of land.)
Availability of construction materials and feed for livestock increased. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Plant multipurpose tree and shrubs species.)
Environment rehabilitation and natural beauty of the area increased. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Improve micro and macro environment)
Increase production and productivity of land. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Plant multipurpose plant species.)
编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
Degraded lands are rehabilitated (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Strengthening incentive based SWC approach)
Sustainable soil and water conservation practices are in place. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Increase training and follow-up)
Community has gained knowledge participating on local level planning. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: provide frequent traininng to planning teams from the community working with SWC specialists)
Additional income is generated from rehabilitated and closed areas. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Resource management responsibilities given to the community)
SWC technologies are adopted. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Close supervision and monitoring and evaluation to be further strengthened.)

7. 参考和链接

7.1 方法/信息来源

  • 实地考察、实地调查
  • 与土地使用者的访谈

模块