1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的项目名称（如相关）

Preventing and Remediating degradation of soils in Europe through Land Care (EU-RECARE )

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称（如相关）

University of Padova (UNIPD) - 意大利

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

（现场）数据是什么时候汇编的？:

05/05/2015

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

是

1.4 SLM技术问卷的参考

2.1 该方法的简要说明

Managing land, water, plants and animals to meet the landscape restoration, climate change and food security.

2.2 该方法的详细说明

该方法的详细说明:

Aims / objectives: Carbon farming seeks to reduce emissions in its production processes, while increasing production and sequestering carbon in the landscape. Carbon farming in the Veneto region has never been applied yet, although it might be proposed as an integrated approach to manage agricultural lands.

Methods: Several strategies can be included in the carbon farming approach, e.g. conservation agriculture, cover cropping, manure application, precision agriculture etc. All these methods have the aim to improve the rate of CO2 removed from the atmosphere and converted to soil organic matter and plant materials. As a result, the final goal is the adoption of land management practices in which carbon gains exceed carbon losses.

Stages of implementation: Carbon farming initiative has never been adopted in Italy and in the Veneto region, although it has been proposed worldwide (e.g. Australia, US). Neverthless, it might be a new way to implement low-impact agricultural activities.

Role of stakeholders: Stakeholders may be involved in the evaluation of the best practices to reduce carbon emissions in the atmosphere as well to increase/maintain crop productivity.

2.3 该方法的照片

2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点

2.7 方法的类型

• 基于项目/方案

2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标

The Approach focused on SLM only

Reduce emissions in the production processes while increasing production and sequestering carbon in the landscape

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: The main problem to be addressed by this approach is the loss of soil organic matter and generally the loss of soil quality. Moreover, by adopting low-impact agricultural practices in the context of the Carbon Farming approach would favour a reduction in CO2 emissions.

2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件

3.1 该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责

3.2 当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段

	当地土地使用者/当地社区的参与	指定参与人员并描述活动
启动/动机	互动
计划	外部支持
实施	外部支持
监测/评估	外部支持
Research	互动

3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策

具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:

• 主要是SLM专家，咨询土地使用者之后

解释:

This approach is not yet applied in Italy, but some experiences are from other countries (e.g. USA, Australia)

4.1 能力建设/培训

是否为土地使用者/其他利益相关者提供培训？:

是

明确受训人员:

• 土地使用者
• 现场工作人员/顾问

涵盖的主题:

Climate change, sustainable land management strategies, administrative aspects, project planning and implementation.

4.2 咨询服务

土地使用者有权使用咨询服务吗？:

是

指明是否提供了咨询服务:

• 在土地使用者的土地上

说明/注释:

Name of method used for advisory service: Authorised advisory services, public and private; Key elements: Objectives , Project design, Administrative support

4.3 机构强化（组织发展）

是否通过这种方法建立或加强了机构？:

• 是，适度

具体说明机构的强化或建立程度:

• 本地

4.4 监测和评估

监测和评估是该方法的一部分吗？:

是

注释:

bio-physical aspects were ad hoc monitored by land users through observations

bio-physical aspects were regular monitored by project staff through measurements

technical aspects were regular monitored by land users through observations

socio-cultural aspects were regular monitored by government through measurements

economic / production aspects were regular monitored by land users through observations

economic / production aspects were ad hoc monitored by project staff through measurements

no. of land users involved aspects were regular monitored by government through observations

management of Approach aspects were regular monitored by government through observations

There were several changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation: The approach should be continuously updated after continuous monitoring

4.5 研究

研究是该方法的一部分吗?

是

明确话题:

• 经济/市场营销
• 生态学
• 技术

提供进一步的细节，并指出是谁做的研究:

Research institutes, government

5.1 该方法中SLM组成部分的年度预算

如果不知道准确的年度预算，请给出一个范围:

• 100,000-1,000,000

注释（例如主要的资助来源/主要捐助者）:

Approach costs were met by the following donors: local government (district, county, municipality, village etc): 100.0%

5.2 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援

土地使用者是否获得实施该技术的财政/物质支持？:

是

5.3 对特定投入的补贴（包括劳动力）

• 设备

• 农业

如果土地使用者的劳动力是一项重要的投入，那么是不是:

• 以现金支付

6.1 方法的影响

6.2 土地使用者实施SLM的主要动机

6.4 该方法的长处/优点

土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会
Improvement of soil fertility (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Subsidies)

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
Reducing agricultural impacts on CO2 emissions as well as increasing the SOC content (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Technical support )

6.5 该方法的弱点/缺点以及克服它们的方法

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
SOC content in the short-term is difficult to quantify, thus restricting the abuility to demonstrate the positive impacts

7.1 方法/信息来源

7.2 参考可用出版物

标题、作者、年份、ISBN:

The integration of biodiversity and climate change: A contextual assessment of the carbon farming initiative, Van Oosterzee P., 2012Carbon farming Iniitiative, Australian government - Dept. of Environment

可以从哪里获得?成本如何?

climatechange.gov.au

标题、作者、年份、ISBN:

Carbon farming Iniitiative, Australian government - Dept. of Environment

可以从哪里获得?成本如何?

climatechange.gov.au