1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的项目名称（如相关）

Reversing land degradation in Africa by scaling-up Evergreen Agriculture (Regreening Africa)

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称（如相关）

International Centre for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF) - 肯尼亚

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

（现场）数据是什么时候汇编的？:

13/12/2022

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

是

2.1 该方法的简要说明

The Regreening Africa project identifies key individuals within the community who are then trained on land restoration through beekeeping. Through this "training of trainers" approach the trainees then train others.

2.2 该方法的详细说明

该方法的详细说明:

The Regreening Africa project identifies key individuals within communities who are trained on land restoration through beekeeping: the trainees then train others themselves. The characteristics of this “training of trainers” (ToT) approach is that it is community-based, and those selected for training work within areas they can reach with ease from their homes. They are also required to be practicing, or demonstrating interest in, one or more approaches promoted by the project. The selected persons include women, the disabled, and youth, as well as mature people who have the experience to integrate local knowledge.
The objectives of the approach are to cut down on the cost of implementing land restoration by building capacity at the local level. By promoting peer-learning and establishing learning sites within the community, it is believed that a greater number of people can be efficiently reached. The goal is to achieve more trees on farms (especially "bee-friendly" trees) and increased sales of honey and other products, leading to better living standards and a sustained, healthy environment.
Training includes technologies that cover tree growing (including farmer managed natural regeneration) with an emphasis on beekeeping as a commercial venture within a promising value chain. Thus, they are trained specifically on beekeeping as well as hive making to meet the high demand for honey. They are supported with high value seed and tree seedlings for integration into farms to support their apiary businesses. The main stakeholders involved include World Vision Kenya who mobilize farmers and link them to other actors in beekeeping value chains; ICRAF who provide training on beekeeping and hive making, as well as technologies for tree growing and management; and county government who have constituted a forum to regulate prices. Communities then implement the technologies. Initially the farming communities disliked bees due to possible attacks, but after training about setting up apiaries and bee-based businesses, and based on their experience after implementing the lessons learnt from the training, they have become more receptive to the approach.

2.3 该方法的照片

2.4 该方法的视频

2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点

2.6 该方法的开始和终止日期

2.7 方法的类型

• 基于项目/方案

2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标

To enable communities benefit from the land restoration approaches, equally reach many people with the technology and build local resources and capacities.

2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件

3.1 该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责

3.2 当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段

	当地土地使用者/当地社区的参与	指定参与人员并描述活动
启动/动机	互动	local community consultation was conducted to determine the land restoration issues. community opinion leaders, community representatives and local leaders are involved.
计划	互动	planning is facilitated by the implementing NGO, communities generate the plans
实施	互动	community are enabled to implement through trainings and provision of some material as they also contribute part of the materials.
监测/评估	外部支持	internal monitoring systems are in place to enable communities adapt to changes to implementation. External reviewers are involved to assess impacts of the intervention.

3.3 流程图（如可用）

3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策

具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:

• 所有相关参与者，作为参与式方法的一部分

解释:

participatory approaches are adopted for ownership and adoption, communities understand their landscape and own indigenous knowledge and history of what works and what does not. expert bring additional knowledge to improve the local practices, counties provide linkage for external support to strengthen the approach further.

明确做出决策的依据:

• 对充分记录的SLM知识进行评估（基于证据的决策）

4.1 能力建设/培训

是否为土地使用者/其他利益相关者提供培训？:

是

明确受训人员:

• 土地使用者
• 现场工作人员/顾问

如果相关，请说明性别、年龄、地位、种族等。:

Males, females and youth are involved in the training, ensuring women form 30% of the trainees and trainees ages ranged between 8-60 years. Usually training is conducted at local level and most of the communities are of the same ethnic group.

培训形式:

• 在职
• 农民对农民
• 示范区域
• 公开会议

涵盖的主题:

Beekeeping for land restoration, tree nursery establishment and management, honey value chain development

注释:

The approach is specific to beekeeping for land restoration

4.2 咨询服务

土地使用者有权使用咨询服务吗？:

是

指明是否提供了咨询服务:

• 在土地使用者的土地上

说明/注释:

farmers convene at a common place to learn about a specific technology.

4.3 机构强化（组织发展）

是否通过这种方法建立或加强了机构？:

• 是，少许

具体说明机构的强化或建立程度:

• 本地

说明机构、角色和职责、成员等。:

local farmer groups have been registered to enable them receive recognition and financial support from micro credit institutions

具体说明支持类型:

• 财务
• 能力建设/培训
• 设备

提供进一步细节:

farmer groups develop proposals that they present to financial institutions or other NGOs to allow them access fund, some institutions provide equipment

4.4 监测和评估

监测和评估是该方法的一部分吗？:

是

注释:

approach is reviewed periodically to allow actors adapt to prevailing situations.

若是，该文件是否用于监测和评估？:

是

注释:

The information help the planners to decide on better ways to improve the technology

4.5 研究

研究是该方法的一部分吗?

否

5.1 该方法中SLM组成部分的年度预算

如果不知道准确的年度预算，请给出一个范围:

• 2,000-10,000

注释（例如主要的资助来源/主要捐助者）:

EU

5.2 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援

土地使用者是否获得实施该技术的财政/物质支持？:

是

如果是，请具体说明支持的类型、条件和提供者:

The training of trainers were facilitated using the project funds to attend trainings.

5.3 对特定投入的补贴（包括劳动力）

• 农业

如果土地使用者的劳动力是一项重要的投入，那么是不是:

• 自愿

5.4 信用

是否根据SLM活动的方法给予信用值？:

是

对条件（利率、回报等）进行具体说明:

The training of trainers accessed credit through the self-help groups. The interest rates varies from 1-10% depending on the saving groups. most of the training of trainers saved in more than more saving and loaning group.

请具体指明授信方:

self help groups

请具体指明信贷接收人:

Training of Trainers and local communties

5.5 其它激励或手段

是否有其他激励措施或工具用于促进SLM技术的实施？:

是

如果是，请具体说明:

Recognition, best performing training of trainers were visited by the donors and other partners to learn from the approach. that gave them a sense of prestige and motivation and challenged the other ToTs to do better so next time they receive visitors.

6.1 方法的影响

6.2 土地使用者实施SLM的主要动机

6.3 方法活动的可持续性

土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施（无外部支持的情况下）？:

• 是

若是，请说明如何维持:

sustainability is integral part of the approach, the approach thus build local institutions structures to ensures the technology is implemented with or without the external support

6.4 该方法的长处/优点

土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会
inclusive
participatory
stakeholder led

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
inclusive
stakeholder led
participatory

6.5 该方法的弱点/缺点以及克服它们的方法

土地使用者认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
need strong leadership to succeed	leaders that are visionary should be appointed

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
change of role/ change of government incase of county officials	ensure proper hand over and induction for continuity

7.1 方法/信息来源

7.2 参考可用出版物

标题、作者、年份、ISBN:

Regreening Africa annual reports

可以从哪里获得?成本如何?

open access

7.3 链接到网络上可用的相关信息

标题/说明:

Regreening Africa project

URL:

https://regreeningafrica.org/