Improvement of fertilizer using sipaulin plastic [尼泊尔]
- 创建:
- 更新:
- 编制者: Sabita Aryal
- 编辑者: –
- 审查者: Fabian Ottiger
Composting
approaches_2479 - 尼泊尔
查看章节
全部展开 全部收起1. 一般信息
1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式
SLM专业人员:
Thapa Ishwor
尼泊尔
有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称(如相关)
Kathmandu University (KU) - 尼泊尔有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称(如相关)
Sarada Batase Village Development Committee (Sarada Batase VDC) - 尼泊尔1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件
(现场)数据是什么时候汇编的?:
09/01/2015
编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:
是
2. SLM方法的描述
2.1 该方法的简要说明
This SLM is a method of producing quality fertilizer from composted animal manure,decaying leaves and plastics.
2.2 该方法的详细说明
该方法的详细说明:
Aims / objectives: 1 Produce high quality fertilizer(rich in nutrient)
2 Reduce costs and labour,space and maintainane costs.
3 It provides few odour and attracts few pests.
Methods: Firstly,a pit is dug then the organic waste(animal waste , fodder, etc.....)is kept in it.The pit is covered with sipaulin plastic and the waste is left for 2 to 3 months.Due to the properties (Resistance to water , UV stabilisation ,heat seal,flesibility etc) the waste absorbs moisture and allow air to circulate ,Heat is uniformely distributed and then produces a high quality fertilizer.
Stages of implementation: Department of agriculture first distributed siipaulin plastic to a local technician and provide training and knowledge about methods,and Gradually other people of village are also taught its methods,this SLM method is appalied by near by village.
Other important information: Properties of sipaulin plastic are;
---UV stabilization
---Uiform temperature maintainance
---it is very strong.
2.3 该方法的照片
2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点
国家:
尼泊尔
区域/州/省:
Nepal
有关地点的进一步说明:
Batase Sharada
2.6 该方法的开始和终止日期
注明开始年份:
2011
2.7 方法的类型
- 最近的本地倡议/创新
2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标
The Approach focused mainly on other activities than SLM (Quality fretilizer production)
--To provide high quality manure without the loss of nutrients.
--Reduce the use of other very harmful fertilizer and pesticides.
The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: --Low Agricultural production
--Lack of Technical knowledge
--Lack of cash
2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件
法律框架(土地使用权、土地和水使用权)
- 阻碍
The existing land ownership, land use rights / water rights hindered a little the approach implementation Community ownership meant no help in development.
其他
- 阻碍
People were first found learned to use artificial fertilizer due to ignorance.
Treatment through the SLM Approach: People were accordingly made aware about the advantages regarding this SLM.
3. 相关利益相关者的参与和角色
3.1 该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责
- 当地土地使用者/当地社区
Famers of sharada batase
All types of farmers(who grows for subsisdence as well as improve ecoinomy)
- 社区组织
famers of sharada batase
- SLM专家/农业顾问
Farmers(especially the monoculture)
- 地方政府
Sharada batase VDC
- 国家政府(规划者、决策者)
Department of agriculture
3.2 当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段
当地土地使用者/当地社区的参与 | 指定参与人员并描述活动 | |
---|---|---|
启动/动机 | 互动 | Ishwor thapa(a local technician)first launched the idea over village. |
计划 | 外部支持 | Department of Agriculture is planning this. |
实施 | 自我动员 | People who are involved in farming (specially monoculture) and the people who wish for a better production at lower cost. |
监测/评估 | 被动 | Monitaring is passive since the SLM is recently being avainable in the village. |
Research | 被动 | Since the process is applied by the people at individual level,people are only concerned about productivity. |
3.3 流程图(如可用)
3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策
具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:
- 仅限土地使用者(自主)
解释:
Plastics were distributed and one of the farmer was given training so that he can train all the villagers and make them known to the use of plastic instead of wasting it as non degradable material
Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by by land users* alone (self-initiative / bottom-up). Local technician was trained and was given the job to train other people in the village.
4. 技术支持、能力建设和知识管理
4.1 能力建设/培训
是否为土地使用者/其他利益相关者提供培训?:
是
明确受训人员:
- 现场工作人员/顾问
培训形式:
- 课程
涵盖的主题:
Ishwor thapa one of the local farmer as well as technician was given the training and was given the knowledge and use of SLM.
4.2 咨询服务
土地使用者有权使用咨询服务吗?:
是
说明/注释:
Advisory service is quite adequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; Since the result are quite satisfactory the advisory service is quite adequaet.
4.3 机构强化(组织发展)
是否通过这种方法建立或加强了机构?:
- 是,适度
具体说明机构的强化或建立程度:
- 本地
具体说明支持类型:
- 财务
4.4 监测和评估
监测和评估是该方法的一部分吗?:
是
注释:
bio-physical aspects were regular monitored by land users through observations
technical aspects were regular monitored by government, land users through observations
socio-cultural aspects were regular monitored by government through observations
economic / production aspects were regular monitored by land users through observations
area treated aspects were regular monitored by land users through measurements
no. of land users involved aspects were monitored by government through measurements
management of Approach aspects were monitored by None through observations
There were few changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation: Regular monitoring help in the result evaluation.
There were no changes in the Technology as a result of monitoring and evaluation
4.5 研究
研究是该方法的一部分吗?
是
- Productivity and quqlity of product was measured.
提供进一步的细节,并指出是谁做的研究:
This research was done by Agricultural specialist od department of agriculture.
Research was carried out both on station and on-farm
5. 融资和外部物质支持
5.1 该方法中SLM组成部分的年度预算
如果不知道准确的年度预算,请给出一个范围:
- 2,000-10,000
注释(例如主要的资助来源/主要捐助者):
Approach costs were met by the following donors: government (Department of agriculture ): 50.0%; local community / land user(s) (Farmers): 50.0%
5.2 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援
土地使用者是否获得实施该技术的财政/物质支持?:
是
如果是,请具体说明支持的类型、条件和提供者:
Government aid
5.3 对特定投入的补贴(包括劳动力)
- 设备
具体说明哪些投入得到了补贴 | 程度如何 | 对补贴做出具体说明 |
---|---|---|
Silpaulin plastics | 充分融资 | |
如果土地使用者的劳动力是一项重要的投入,那么是不是:
- 自愿
5.4 信用
是否根据SLM活动的方法给予信用值?:
否
6. 影响分析和结论性陈述
6.1 方法的影响
该方法是否帮助土地使用者实施和维护SLM技术?:
- 否
- 是,很少
- 是,中等
- 是,支持力度很大
The soil in which organic manure is used is free of mass wasting.
该方法是否有助于社会和经济弱势群体?:
- 否
- 是,很少
- 是,中等
- 是,支持力度很大
Increase in agricultural production.
该方法是否改善了阻碍SLM技术实施的土地使用权/用户权问题?:
- 否
- 是,很少
- 是,中等
- 是,支持力度很大
There was no hinderance.
Did other land users / projects adopt the Approach?
- 否
- 是,很少
- 是,中等
- 是,支持力度很大
All the farmers in sharada batase.
Did the Approach lead to improved livelihoods / human well-being?
- 否
- 是,很少
- 是,中等
- 是,支持力度很大
Better quality manure leading to high production.
Did the Approach help to alleviate poverty?
- 否
- 是,很少
- 是,中等
- 是,支持力度很大
increase crop yields.
6.2 土地使用者实施SLM的主要动机
- 增加生产
Increase crop yield
6.3 方法活动的可持续性
土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施(无外部支持的情况下)?:
- 是
若是,请说明如何维持:
Since the technology can be easily adopted after a training it is simple and easy to continue the approach activity without any support.
6.4 该方法的长处/优点
土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会 |
---|
--The land users have taken this as a boon for orange farming. --It have reduced the use of artificial fertilizer. --The orange production and quality was found improved. --Not only animal wastes but also the fodders and kitchen wastes has been utilized. --socio-ecnomic development. |
编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会 |
---|
- It can help farmers t manage animal waste nto quality fertilizer. - It is cheap and also easily affordable. - Monoculture farmers can easily access this method. - Dont need any vast and complex knowledge for implementation. - inprove economy by increasing production. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: - It can be enhanced by making aware about the use of organic fertilizer and reduce the use of harmful fertilizer. - Government should research on such SLM with continuous monitoring.) |
6.5 该方法的弱点/缺点以及克服它们的方法
编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险 | 如何克服它们? |
---|---|
-- People may take it time consuming. -- They are more interested inartificial pesticides. |
--people must get aware of impacts of harmful pesticides, |
7. 参考和链接
7.1 方法/信息来源
- 实地考察、实地调查
- 与土地使用者的访谈
链接和模块
全部展开 全部收起链接
无链接
模块
无模块