Technologies

Contour "V" Ditch [India]

Samapatana V nala

technologies_1478 - India

Completeness: 73%

1. General information

1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Technology

Key resource person(s)

SLM specialist:
SLM specialist:

1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT

When were the data compiled (in the field)?

15/10/2006

The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:

Yes

2. Description of the SLM Technology

2.1 Short description of the Technology

Definition of the Technology:

V-ahaped sturcture on contour line in order to check sheet/reel erosion and for moisture retension.

2.2 Detailed description of the Technology

Description:

V-shaped structures on contour line .The size of the V ditch varies according to slope, depth of soil and soil texture. The V-ditch can be laid eithr in staggered or continuous. Purpose- 1. To control sheet and reel erosion 2. Retention of in situ soil moisture 3. To increase vegetative cover. Establishment/maintenance -- 1. Bunding, 2. Terracing, 3. Turfing, 4. Provisioin of outlets in contour lines. Environment:- Bio-Physical-1-Cropland-Annual 2. Grazing land-Extensive, 3. Forest, Socio-Economic- 1. land ownership-User Group (32 Members) 2. Land use rights-Usufructary Rights.

2.3 Photos of the Technology

2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment

Country:

India

Region/ State/ Province:

Orissa

Further specification of location:

Orissa/Nuapada

2.6 Date of implementation

If precise year is not known, indicate approximate date:
  • less than 10 years ago (recently)

2.7 Introduction of the Technology

Specify how the Technology was introduced:
  • through projects/ external interventions
Comments (type of project, etc.):

Integarted Watershed Development Project (World bank aided) in Khandhamal and Ganjam districts of Orissa

3. Classification of the SLM Technology

3.1 Main purpose(s) of the Technology

  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation

3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied

Cropland

Cropland

  • Annual cropping
  • Perennial (non-woody) cropping
  • Tree and shrub cropping
Main crops (cash and food crops):

Major food crop perennial cropping: Arhar
Major cash crop tree and shrub cropping: Cashew nut

Comments:

Major land use problems (compiler’s opinion): (i) Sheet & rill erosion (ii) Low Moisture status.

Major land use problems (land users’ perception): (i) Erosion (ii) Vegetation survival (iii) Low productivity of land

Type of cropping system and major crops comments: No

3.3 Further information about land use

Water supply for the land on which the Technology is applied:
  • rainfed
Number of growing seasons per year:
  • 2
Specify:

Longest growing period in days: 150Longest growing period from month to month: Jun - OctSecond longest growing period in days: 75Second longest growing period from month to month: Nov - Jan

3.4 SLM group to which the Technology belongs

  • cross-slope measure
  • water harvesting

3.5 Spread of the Technology

Comments:

Total area covered by the SLM Technology is 0.14 m2.

3.6 SLM measures comprising the Technology

3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology

soil erosion by water

soil erosion by water

  • Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
  • Wo: offsite degradation effects
Comments:

Main type of degradation addressed: Wt: loss of topsoil / surface erosion

Secondary types of degradation addressed: Wo: offsite degradation effects

Main causes of degradation: deforestation / removal of natural vegetation (incl. forest fires), other human induced causes (specify) (agricultural causes), education, access to knowledge and support services (lack of knowledge)

Secondary causes of degradation: over-exploitation of vegetation for domestic use, overgrazing, droughts, land tenure (land subdivision), Land alienation

3.8 Prevention, reduction, or restoration of land degradation

Specify the goal of the Technology with regard to land degradation:
  • reduce land degradation

4. Technical specifications, implementation activities, inputs, and costs

4.1 Technical drawing of the Technology

4.2 Technical specifications/ explanations of technical drawing

V-Ditch technical drawing

Location: QTInd16TechDraw.jpg

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: moderate

Technical knowledge required for land users: low

Main technical functions: control of dispersed runoff: retain / trap

Secondary technical functions: control of dispersed runoff: impede / retard, increase of infiltration, increase / maintain water stored in soil, increase in soil fertility

Vegetative measure: Turfing of bund
Vegetative material: G : grass
Vertical interval between rows / strips / blocks (m): 2
Spacing between rows / strips / blocks (m): 1
Vertical interval within rows / strips / blocks (m): 2
Width within rows / strips / blocks (m): 1.5

Vegetative measure: Vegetative material: G : grass

Vegetative measure: Vegetative material: G : grass

Vegetative measure: Vegetative material: G : grass

Grass species: Vetiver/Berunbuta

Slope (which determines the spacing indicated above): 8.00%

If the original slope has changed as a result of the Technology, the slope today is (see figure below): 6.00%

Gradient along the rows / strips: 0.00%

Structural measure: Contour V ditch
Vertical interval between structures (m): 2
Spacing between structures (m): 1
Depth of ditches/pits/dams (m): average
Width of ditches/pits/dams (m): 2
Length of ditches/pits/dams (m): 1.5
Height of bunds/banks/others (m): 0.3
Width of bunds/banks/others (m): Bottom=0.8 Top=0.2
Length of bunds/banks/others (m): 1.5

Construction material (earth): Soil excavated from the ditches are used to construct banks/bunds

Slope (which determines the spacing indicated above): 8%

If the original slope has changed as a result of the Technology, the slope today is: 6%

Lateral gradient along the structure: 0%

Vegetation is used for stabilisation of structures.

4.3 General information regarding the calculation of inputs and costs

other/ national currency (specify):

Rupee

Indicate exchange rate from USD to local currency (if relevant): 1 USD =:

50.0

Indicate average wage cost of hired labour per day:

1.00

4.4 Establishment activities

Activity Type of measure Timing
1. Local grass barrier Vegetative On the onset of monsoon
2. Cashew plantation Vegetative During rainy season
3. Survey & layout Structural Before onset of monsoon.
4. Digging of pit & construction of earthen bund Structural Premonsoon.
5. Stone pitching on upstream slope of pit Structural Premonsoon.
6. grass turffing Structural monsoon

4.5 Costs and inputs needed for establishment

Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit Total costs per input % of costs borne by land users
Labour Labour ha 1.0 35.0 35.0
Construction material Stone ha 1.0 5.0 5.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 40.0
Comments:

Duration of establishment phase: 12 month(s)

4.6 Maintenance/ recurrent activities

Activity Type of measure Timing/ frequency
1. Mini tillage Agronomic khariff / annual
2. Cover cropping Agronomic khariff / annual
3. Weeding Vegetative After rooting /Six months
4. Soil work Vegetative After rooting /Six months
5. Manuring Vegetative During rainy season /Twice in a year.
6. Fire Control measures Vegetative During winter season /annual
7. Turfing of bund with grass Structural during rain/annual
8. De-silting of pits Structural before onset of monsoon/annual
9. Maintaining upstream & down stream arrrangement Structural before onset of monsoon/annual
10. Re-arrangement of displaced stone Structural before onset of monsoon/annual

4.7 Costs and inputs needed for maintenance/ recurrent activities (per year)

Comments:

Length and cross section of the strucutre, stone availability.

4.8 Most important factors affecting the costs

Describe the most determinate factors affecting the costs:

Labour availability, Availability of grass/stone , Transportation facility.

5. Natural and human environment

5.1 Climate

Annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Specify average annual rainfall (if known), in mm:

1250.00

Agro-climatic zone
  • semi-arid

5.2 Topography

Slopes on average:
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms:
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitudinal zone:
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Comments and further specifications on topography:

Landforms: Also mountain slopes and ridges

5.3 Soils

Soil depth on average:
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil):
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
Topsoil organic matter:
  • medium (1-3%)
If available, attach full soil description or specify the available information, e.g. soil type, soil PH/ acidity, Cation Exchange Capacity, nitrogen, salinity etc.

Soil fertility: Medium
Soil drainage/infiltration: Medium
Soil water storage capacity: Medium (ranked 1) and high (ranked 2)

5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation of production system:
  • subsistence (self-supply)
Off-farm income:
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth:
  • very poor
  • poor
Level of mechanization:
  • manual work
Indicate other relevant characteristics of the land users:

Population density: 100-200 persons/km2
Annual population growth: 1% - 2%
10% of the land users are average wealthy and own 50% of the land.
20% of the land users are poor and own 30% of the land.
70% of the land users are poor and own 20% of the land.
Level of mechanization: Manual work (100% of the activities are performed manuall)
Market orientation: Subsistence (All crops are for self consumption presently)

5.7 Average area of land owned or leased by land users applying the Technology

  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha

5.8 Land ownership, land use rights, and water use rights

Land ownership:
  • state
  • individual, titled
Land use rights:
  • leased
  • individual

6. Impacts and concluding statements

6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown

Socio-economic impacts

Production

crop production

decreased
increased

fodder production

decreased
increased
Comments/ specify:

Nil

fodder quality

decreased
increased
Comments/ specify:

Nil

product diversity

decreased
increased
Comments/ specify:

Cover crop, Agro forestry,Fruit crops and Tuber crops taken up

Income and costs

farm income

decreased
increased
Comments/ specify:

Rs. 500/- per Ha. Rs. 10/- per day

workload

increased
decreased
Comments/ specify:

Needs maintenance timely.

Socio-cultural impacts

community institutions

weakened
strengthened
Comments/ specify:

Users groups formed and functioning.

SLM/ land degradation knowledge

reduced
improved
Comments/ specify:

By the users

conflict mitigation

worsened
improved
Comments/ specify:

Community mobilisation is requirede to solve conflicts.

Ecological impacts

Water cycle/ runoff

surface runoff

increased
decreased
Quantity before SLM:

65

Quantity after SLM:

40

excess water drainage

reduced
improved
Comments/ specify:

Crops grown and supplemental irrigation

Soil

soil moisture

decreased
increased
Comments/ specify:

Waste weir disposal

soil loss

increased
decreased
Comments/ specify:

Vegetation established

Biodiversity: vegetation, animals

plant diversity

decreased
increased
Comments/ specify:

Due to fertility

6.2 Off-site impacts the Technology has shown

downstream flooding

increased
reduced

downstream siltation

increased
decreased

groundwater/ river pollution

increased
reduced

wind transported sediments

increased
reduced

6.4 Cost-benefit analysis

How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?
Short-term returns:

neutral/ balanced

Long-term returns:

positive

How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?
Short-term returns:

positive

Long-term returns:

very positive

6.5 Adoption of the Technology

If available, quantify (no. of households and/ or area covered):

34

Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have did so spontaneously, i.e. without receiving any material incentives/ payments?
  • 0-10%
Comments:

15% of land user families have adopted the Technology with external material support

32 land user families have adopted the Technology with external material support

Comments on acceptance with external material support: survey results

5% of land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support

2 land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support

Comments on spontaneous adoption: survey results

6.7 Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities of the Technology

Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the land user’s view
Low cost
Simple technology
User friendly
Affordable

How can they be sustained / enhanced? Guidance on cropping practices
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
Based on traditional practices
Low Cost
Farmers can maintain
Coserve insitu soil moisture
Conserve the most vluable top soil

How can they be sustained / enhanced? Involve people in planning
Involve farmers while executing
Place suitable disposal system in right places
Regular maintenance
Establishment of vegetative measures
Adoption of proper cropping practices by the farmers

6.8 Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks of the Technology and ways of overcoming them

Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the land user’s view How can they be overcome?
Apprehend getting benefits which will suffice their livelihoods Off farm activities tomake them financially sound.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view How can they be overcome?
Conflicts in future among farmers Exposure on group dynamics and management of common property
Mobilisation of DWF and developemnt of corpus fund Community organisation to generate corpus fund

Links and modules

Expand all Collapse all

Modules