អនុសញ្ញាសហប្រជាជាតិប្រយុទ្ធប្រឆាំងនឹងរហោស្ថានកម្ម

Ecological restoration in Macalube d'Aragona [ប្រទេសអ៊ីតាលី]

  • ការបង្កើត៖
  • បច្ចុប្បន្នភាព
  • អ្នកចងក្រង៖
  • អ្នកកែសម្រួល៖
  • អ្នកត្រួតពិនិត្យ

របាការណ៍អង្គភាព: Italy

សូមបញ្ជាក់ប្រសិនបើបច្ចេកទេសដែលបានព័ណ៌នានៅក្នុងផ្នែកនេះ Template ឬផ្នែកមួយនៃ Template នេះត្រូវបានគ្រប់ដណ្តប់ដោយសិទ្ធិអចលនទ្រព្យ: ទេ

មើលប្រវត្តិ

ពិនិត្យមើលគ្រប់ផ្នែក

ពង្រីកមើលទាំងអស់ បង្រួមទាំងអស់
ភាពពេញលេញ៖ 89%

ព័ត៌មានទូទៅ

ព័ត៌មានទូទៅ

ចំណងជើងនៃការអនុវត្តន៍ល្អ:

Ecological restoration in Macalube d'Aragona

ប្រទេស:

ប្រទេសអ៊ីតាលី

របាការណ៍អង្គភាព:

Italy

សិទ្ធិអចលនទ្រព្យ

សូមបញ្ជាក់ប្រសិនបើបច្ចេកទេសដែលបានព័ណ៌នានៅក្នុងផ្នែកនេះ Template ឬផ្នែកមួយនៃ Template នេះត្រូវបានគ្រប់ដណ្តប់ដោយសិទ្ធិអចលនទ្រព្យ:

ទេ

ការចាត់ចំណាត់ថ្នាក់

ការប្រើប្រាស់ដីនៅក្នុងទីតាំងដែលបានកំណត់

  • ដីដាំដំណាំ
  • ដីខ្សោះជីជាតិ

វិធានការក្នុងការួមចំណែកទប់ស្កាត់រហោស្ថានកម្ម ការធ្លាក់ចុះគុណភាពដី និងគ្រោះរាំងស្ងួត​​ (DLDD)

  • ការស្តារឡើងវិញ

ទំនាក់ទំនងជាមួយការអនុវត្តន៍ល្អៗផ្សេងទៀត

  • ពង្រឹងសមត្ថភាព និងការលើកកម្ពស់ការយល់ដឹង
  • ការស្រាវជ្រាវ/​ការវាយតម្លៃ និងត្រួតពិនិត្យ DLDD និង SLM
  • ការគ្រប់គ្រងចំណេះដឹង និងជំនួយក្នុងការសម្រេចចិត្ត
  • កាចូលរួម ការសហការ និងបណ្តាញ

លក្ខណៈពិសេស

ផ្នែកទី 1.ការអនុវត្តន៍ល្អ៖ លក្ខខណ្ឌ(បរិស្ថានមនុស្ស និងបរិស្ថានធម្មជាតិ)

ការព័ណ៌នាសង្ខេបចំពោះការអនុវត្តន៍ដែលល្អៗ

The best practice was the ecological restoration of natural habitats from rainfed croplands in the protected area of the mud volcanos of Macalube d'Aragona (Sicily).  The practice consisted of the plantation of authoctonous plant species that are very relevant for local biodiversity such as Lygeum spartum and the protection of the primary grassland consortia (Bromo-Oryzopsion miliaceae, Moricandio-Lygeion sparti, Frankenion pulverulentae, ecc.). Wheat monocropping was threatening the natural habitats surrounding the volcanos, through wetlands drainage and soil manipulation. The institution of the Protected Area generated new conflicts between farmers, environmentalists and the regional government, which envisaged the opportunities to develop the tourist attraction potential .
The case study is particularly relevant in relation to the social learning process that transformed a conflict of interests into a concerted action.
Farmers were involved by environmentalists in a learning process that led to the conversion of wheat monocropping into diversified cropping systems based on legumes and cereals outside the protected area.  
The process was triggered by the Macalife project (www.macalife.it), that opened new opportunities to create a learning platform in which scientific and local knowledge were integrated. Mud volcanos played the role of "mediating object" around which environmentalists were able to deconstruct and rebuild a new deal with farmers, that shift from intensive farming to environmental restoration. A new cooperative enterprise was created, which is responsible of the maintenance of the habitats while generating income from the thousands of visitors of the site, thus contributing to the rural development of the whole area.|

ទីតាំង

Sicily

ប្រសិនបើទីតាំងត្រូវបានកំណត់ព្រំប្រទល់ច្បាស់លាស់ សូមបញ្ជាក់ពីទំហំខ្នាតជាហិកតា:

256.0

សូមកំណត់ពីចំនួនប្រជាជនដែលរស់នៅក្នុងតំបន់នោះ:

1000.0

ការព័ណ៌នាសង្ខេបនៃបរិស្ថានធម្មជាតិនៅក្នុងតំបន់ជាក់លាក់

The climate of southern Sicily is semi-arid and dry sub-humid (WMO-UNEP Aridity Index). IN the nearest weather station (Agrigento, 313 msl) annual maximum temperatures range between 14 and 30°C, minimum temperatures 7.7 and 21.4 °C. Average annual rainfall is 497 mm. At regional level, in the period 1921-2002  temperature increased by 1.5 °C and average annual rainfall declined by 158 mm.
Hilly with slopes ranging from 5% to 40%. Arable land includes steep slope and soil erosion by water is frequent in the area.
Soil of cropped areas are eutric fluviosols developed on clay hills.
In the protected area of Macalube soils are heavy clay generated by sedimentary volcanism

លក្ខណ្ឌសេដ្ឋកិច្ចសង្គមនៃការរស់នៅក្នុងតំបន់ និង ក្បែរតំបន់

According to the National Institute of Statistics data (2006) the main economic activities and their share of the regional GDP is:
Agriculture, fishing 3,52 %
Industry 9,30%
Construction 5,52%
Commerce, tourism 18,28%
Services 28,28%
Finance, real estate 21,29%|
The average per capita GDP in the province of Agrigento  (14.790 Euro) is below both the average country value ( 30.680 Euro)  and the Sicily average ( 17.533 Euro) (year 2008).
Land ownership or rent is the dominant land tenure in these rural areas. The cropped area surronding the mud volcanos was sold by private owners to the Regional Government following the participatory actions implemented by the local Environmental NGO, with the scientific support of researchers of the University of Palermo.|

តើផ្អែកលើមូលដ្ឋាននៃលក្ខណៈវិនិច្ឆ័យ និង/ឬ (ការចង្អុរបង្ហាញ)(ដែលមិនទាក់ទឹងទៅនឹងយុទ្ធសាស្ត្រ) ការអនុវត្តដែលលើកឡើង និងទាក់ទងទៅនឹងបច្ចេកទេសត្រូវបានពិចារណាថា ''ល្អ"?

The practice was considered as 'best' on the basis of the analysis of the efficacy, efficiency, effectiveness of the practice.
- The paradigm shift of farmers was considered as an indicator of efficacy of the actions of the environmentalist NGO and the University researchers leading the informal facilitation platform
- The relatively low investements put in place through the Macalife project was considered as an indicator of efficiency.
- The non-coercive shift of farmers that became managers of the protected area through the cooperative enterprise and the willingness to carry on with a self-organized adaptive management of the protected area were considered as indicators of effectiveness. |

ផ្នែកទី 2.បញ្ហាដែលដោះស្រាយ(មូលហេតុដោយផ្ទាល់ និងមិនដោយផ្ទាល់)​​ និងទិសដៅនៃការអនុវត្ត

កំណត់បញ្ហាចំបងៗដែលបានដោះស្រាយតាមរយៈការអនុវត្តដែលល្អ

Threats to endangered priority habitats for the EU|Conflicts of interests between the agricultural activity and the environmental conservation. |Land degradation and loss of biodiversity related to farming practices in drylands

ចំណុចសំខាន់ៗជាក់លាក់នៃបញ្ហាការធ្លាក់ចុះគុណភាពដីដែលត្រូវបានដោះស្រាយតាមរយៈការអនុត្តន៍ដែលល្អ

Soil erosion on slopes caused by intensive arable cropping systems in drylands
Soil sealing and organic matter depletion caused by burning crop residuals
Drainage of temporary wetlands in high valuable habitats.

ផ្នែកទី 3.សកម្មភាព

ការព័ណ៌នាសង្ខេបនៃសកម្មភាពសំខាន់ៗ ទៅតាមទិសដៅរបស់វា

Collection, multiplication and plantation of local germplasm of authoctonous species such as Lygeum spartum involving farmers.|Restoration of temporary wetlands in collaboration with farmers|Limitations to farming practices in the areas closer to the mud volcanos and participatory planning of habitat maintenance
Institution of the cooperative by the farmers with the role of maintaining the restored habitats and to guide visitors in the protected area.
|Investments in capacity building courses for farmers to develop sustainable farming practices in the croplands surronding the protected area.|Participatory design of new cropping systems around the priority habitat integrating local (i.e. farmers)
Analysis of the vegetation and of its level of conservation|Participatory monitoring of the ecological vegetation dynamics determined by the interventions of environmental restoration.|Assessment of different restoration ecology techniques.

ការព័ណ៌នាសង្ខេប និងភាពជាក់លាក់នៃបច្ចេកទេស

The researchers of the University of Palermo developed a protocol for the collection, multiplication, nursery installation and plantation of the main endangered native species
typical of the habitats surrounding the mud volcanos. This protocol was implemented using low-cost technologies based on conventional farming practices. The job requirements were recruited within the local farmers. FArmers were also involved in the restoration of some degradad habitats where the soil was manipulated and drainage implemented for farming purposes.|

ផ្នែកទី 4. ស្ថាប័ន/ភាគីពាក់ព័ន្ធដែលចូលរួម (ការសហការ ការចូលរួម តួនាទីរបស់ស្ថាប័នពាក់ព័ន្ធ)

ឈ្មោះ និងអាសយដ្ឋានរបស់ស្ថាប័នដែលបង្កើតបច្ចេកទេស


Dr. Tommaso La Mantia |University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Edificio 4, Ingresso H, 90128 Palermo

តើបច្ចេកទេសត្រូវបានបង្កើតឡើងក្នុងភាពជាដៃគូដែរឬទេ?

បាទ/ចា៎

បញ្ជីរាយនាមឈ្មោះដៃគូ:

Environmental NGO|Cooperative of local farmers

សូមបញ្ជាក់ពីរបៀបនៃការលើកទឹកចិត្តឳ្យអនុវត្តបច្ចេកទេស

  • គំនិតផ្តួចផ្តើមនៅក្នុងតំបន់
  • គំនិតផ្តួចផ្តើមដោយកម្មវិធី/គម្រោងជាមូលដ្ឋាន

តើមានការចូលរួមរបស់ភាគីពាក់ព័ន្ធក្នុងតំបន់ រួមទាំង CSOs ជំរុញក្នុងការអភិវឌ្ឍន៍បច្ចេកទេសនេះដែរ ឬទេ?

បាទ/ចា៎

សូមរាយបញ្ជីភាគីពាក់ព័ន្ធដែលជាប់ទាក់ទង:

Cooperative of local farmers|Environmental CSO

ចំពោះបញ្ជីរាយនាមភាគីពាក់ព័ន្ធ​ខាងលើ សូមបញ្ជាក់ពីតួនាទីរបស់ភាគីទាំងនោះក្នុងការរៀបចំ ការណែនាំ ការប្រើប្រាស់ និងថែទាំបច្ចេកទេស ប្រសិនបើមាន

Environmental CSO: preparation and management of the EU project MacaLife, within the .
Cooperative of local farmers: responsible for ordinary and extraordinary maintaing of ecological restauration, environmental presidium territory and the organization of guided tours within the reserve|

តើប្រជាជនដែលរស់នៅក្នុងតំបន់ និងក្បែរតំបន់ /ឬប្រជាជនក្បែរតំបន់ចូលរួមក្នុងការបង្កើតឬអភិវឌ្ឍន៍បច្ចេកទេសដែរឬទេ?

បាទ/ចា៎

តើតាមមធ្យោបាយអ្វីខ្លះ?
  • វិធីសាស្ត្រផ្សព្វផ្សាយដោយមានការចូលរួម

វិភាគ

ផ្នែកទី 5.ការួមចំណែកទៅលើផលប៉ះពាល់

សូមព័ណ៌នាផលប៉ះពាល់ក្នុងបរិវេណអនុវត្ត (ផលប៉ះពាល់ពីរសំខាន់ៗទៅតាមផ្នែក)

Macalube d'Aragona case study is emblematic of the potential benefits related to the shift in perceiving the same natural habitat from a constraint to productivity to a source of income from integrated management.
The rehabilitation of the degraded habitats and the institution of the cooperative significantly increased the tourist flow in the area.
Crop productivity was not substantially affected by the intervention
The learning system that was developed around the ecological restoration of the mud volcanos habitat is a guarantee of effectiveness of the action in the long term.
Restoration of endangered natural priority habitats sourrounding the mud volcanos according to the EU Habitat Directive

សូមព័ណ៌នាផលប៉ះពាល់ខាងក្រៅបរិវេញអនុវត្តចំនួនពីរ (ឧ.មិនមែនកើតនៅក្នុងតំបន់ប៉ុន្តែកើតឡើងនៅតំបន់ជុំវិញតំបន់នោះ)

Development of tourist activities related to the mud volcanos habitat restoration led to economical benefits to the sourrounding area.

ផលប៉ះពាល់ទៅលើជីវៈចម្រុះ និងការកែប្រែអាកាសធាតុ

សូមពន្យល់ពីហេតុផល:

Restoration of habitats and multiplication of authoctonous germplasm of endangered plant species was the main task of the intervention. The monitoring of natural habitats indicates on one side the efficacy of the intervention, on the other side the need of contonuous management  (e.g. through grazing) of some of the priority habitats (e.g. grasslands) in order to maintain the ideal conditions for in-situ germplasm conservation.|
Farming systems in the area are vulnerable to climate change for the risks associated to envisaged changes in rainfall and temperature. The learning process triggered by the intervention provided new options of multifunctionality and adaptive managing to farmers
The area is too small to provide significant impact on climate change mitigation

តើការវិភាគថ្លៃដើម និងអត្ថប្រយោជន៍ត្រូវបានធ្វើឡើងដែរឬទេ?

តើការវិភាគថ្លៃដើម និងអត្ថប្រយោជន៍ត្រូវបានធ្វើឡើងដែរឬទេ?

ទេ

ផ្នែកទី 6.ការទទួលយក និងការថតចម្លង

តើបច្ចេកទេសត្រូវបានផ្សព្វផ្សាយ/ណែនាំទៅទីតាំងផ្សេងៗទៀតដែរឬទេ?

តើបច្ចេកទេសត្រូវបានផ្សព្វផ្សាយ/ណែនាំទៅទីតាំងផ្សេងៗទៀតដែរឬទេ?

បាទ/ចា៎

តើនៅកន្លែងណា?

Island of Lampedusa, Sicily|

តើការលើកទឹកចិត្ត ក្នុងការសម្របសម្រួលជួយសម្រួលដល់ការផ្តល់នូវបច្ចេកទេសដែរឬទេ?

តើការលើកទឹកចិត្ត ក្នុងការសម្របសម្រួលជួយសម្រួលដល់ការផ្តល់នូវបច្ចេកទេសដែរឬទេ?

បាទ/ចា៎

តើអ្នកអាចកំណត់លក្ខខណ្ឌសំខាន់ៗចំនួនបីដែលនាំឱ្យទទួលបានជោគជ័យទៅលើការអនុវត្តន៍ល្អ/បច្ចេកទេសដែលបានបង្ហាញដែរឬទេ?

The conflict between farmers and environmentalists was effectively approached through the integration of scientific and local knowledge, facilitated by the attitude to dialogue of the NGO's operators (whose regional leader is a farmer)|
The availability of funds (project Macalife) triggered the intervention through NGO's and scientists, supported the purchase of private land in the procteted area and the capacity building programme for farmers. |
The (EU and regional) policy framework provided spaces for involvement of local stakeholder in the management of priority habitats.

ការថងចម្លង

ទៅតាមទស្សនៈរបស់អ្នក តើការអនុវត្តន៍ល្អ/បច្ចេកទេសដែលអ្នកបានលើកឡើងអាចជាន់គ្នា បើទោះបីជាមានកម្រិតខ្លះនៃការបន្សុំា​ មាននៅកន្លែងផ្សេងដែរឬទេ?

បាទ/ចា៎

តើនៅត្រឹមកម្រិតណា?
  • ថ្នាក់តំបន់
  • ថ្នាក់ក្រោមជាតិ
  • ថ្នាក់ជាតិ
  • ថ្នាក់អនុតំបន់
  • ថ្នាក់តំបន់
  • ថ្នាក់អន្តរជាតិ

ផ្នែកទី 7.មេរៀនដែលបានរៀន

ទាក់ទងទៅនឹងធនធានមនុស្ស

The role of farmers in managing protected areas was enhanced by the participatory and open approach of the NGO's operators and by the scientists. Even if the practices were not informed by a purposeful framework, they provided a new effective learning space|Farmers learned how to shift from monocropping to a diversified set of activities in a context of multifunctionality|NGO operators learned that dialogue with farmers can lead to mutual collaboration towards integrated management

ទាក់ទងទៅនឹងប្រភពហិរញ្ញវត្ថុ

External funding (i.e. EU) were essential to trigger the process. However, comparing with similar situations in the same region, in this case the cost of the intervention was well repaid by its effectiveness|We don't have precise figures of the cost of the entire intervention, also because the current management is integrated in agricultural practices: further data should be collected to make a comparative balance.

ទាក់ទងទៅនឹងបច្ចេកទេស

The technology used is relatively simple (described above), even if specific knowledge on the biology of enmdangered plant species were essential for the establishment success.|

ម៉ូឌុល