UNCCD

Gestion des pâturages et des corridores de transhumance en Guinée-Bissau [กินี-บิสเซา]

  • ผู้สร้างสรรค์:
  • การอัพเดท:
  • ผู้รวบรวม:
  • ผู้เรียบเรียง:
  • ผู้ตรวจสอบ:

รายงานกิจการ: Guinea-Bissau

Clarify if the technology described in the template, or a part of it, is covered by property rights: ใช่

แสดงความคิดเห็น: Le Ministère de l´Agriculture et du Développement Rural - Gouvernement de Guinée-Bissau

ดูประวัติ
สมบูรณ์: 51%

 ข้อมูลทั่วไป

 ข้อมูลทั่วไป

Title of best practice:

Gestion des pâturages et des corridores de transhumance en Guinée-Bissau

ประเทศ:

กินี-บิสเซา

รายงานกิจการ:

Guinea-Bissau

สิทธิในทรัพย์สิน

Clarify if the technology described in the template, or a part of it, is covered by property rights:

ใช่

โปรดให้ข้อมูลที่เกี่ยวข้องกับผู้ถือครองสิทธิ:

Le Ministère de l´Agriculture et du Développement Rural - Gouvernement de Guinée-Bissau

ข้อมูลจำเพาะ

Section 1. Context of the best practice: frame conditions (natural and human environment)

คำอธิบายแบบสั้น ๆ ของวิธีปฏิบัติที่ดีที่สุด

Gestion des pâturages et des corridores de transhumances en Guinée-Bissau.

Section 4. Institutions/actors involved (collaboration, participation, role of stakeholders)

Name and address of the institution developing the technology

Direction Générale de l´Elevage|CP 71 Bissau (Guinée-Bissau)

Was the technology developed in partnership?

ใช่

รายชื่อของหุ้นส่วน:

CAIA, DGFF, DGA, APRODEL, |

Specify the framework within which the technology was promoted

  • Local initiative
  • National initiative – government-led
  • National initiative – non-government-led
  • Programme/project-based initiative

Was the participation of local stakeholders, including CSOs, fostered in the development of the technology?

ใช่

รายชื่อผู้มีส่วนได้ส่วนเสียท้องถิ่นที่เกี่ยวข้อง:

APRODEL, GUINE VERDE, ADCTAL, |

For the stakeholders listed above, specify their role in the design, introduction, use and maintenance of the technology, if any.

Rôle d´avant garde dans la définition des solutions et alternatives aux problèmes identifiés.

Was the population living in the location and/or nearby involved in the development of the technology?

ใช่

By means of what?
  • Consultation
  • Participatory approaches

การวิเคราะห์

Section 5. Contribution to impact

Describe on-site impacts (the major two impacts by category)

Milieu assez bien conservé et abondance de ressources végétales
Productivité moyenne à assez élévée
Relativement faible pour les populations

Describe the major two off-site (i.e. not occurring in the location but in the surrounding areas) impacts

Raréfaction de végétaux et herbacées

Has a cost-benefit analysis been carried out?

Has a cost-benefit analysis been carried out?

ใช่

Section 6. Adoption and replicability

Was the technology disseminated/introduced to other locations?

Was the technology disseminated/introduced to other locations?

ใช่

ที่ไหน:

Dans les régions Sud de la Guinée-Bissau, Tombali et Quinara|

Were incentives to facilitate the take up of the technology provided?

Were incentives to facilitate the take up of the technology provided?

ใช่

Specify which type of incentives:
  • Policy or regulatory incentives (for example, related to market requirements and regulations, import/export, foreign investment, research & development support, etc)
  • Financial incentives (for example, preferential rates, State aid, subsidies, cash grants, loan guarantees, etc)

Can you identify the three main conditions that led to the success of the presented best practice/technology?

Conditions climatiques
Organisation des agriculteurs
Motivation du Gouvernement

Replicability

In your opinion, the best practice/technology you have proposed can be replicated, although with some level of adaptation, elsewhere?

ใช่

At which level?
  • Local
  • Sub-national
  • National
  • Subregional
  • Regional

Section 7. Lessons learned

Related to human resources

Peu de cadres nationaux sont spécialisés dans ce domaine

Related to technical aspects

Mise en défens, protection des régénérations, etc..|

โมดูล