1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的项目名称（如相关）

The Transboundary Agro-ecosystem Management Project for the Kagera River Basin (GEF-FAO / Kagera TAMP )

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称（如相关）

Kabale District Local Government (Kabale District Local Government) - 乌干达

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称（如相关）

Rakai District - 乌干达

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

（现场）数据是什么时候汇编的？:

06/05/2013

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

是

1.4 SLM技术问卷的参考

2.1 该方法的简要说明

The approach involves the community and other development partners identifying opportunities, challenges and appropriate solutions through collective action.

2.2 该方法的详细说明

该方法的详细说明:

Aims / objectives: To mobilize community members work together to find solution to community problems like environmental degradation , hunger and others with assistance of development partners.
To mobilize community resources to help in solving community problems e.g. labor, water. etc.

Methods: Community meeting between community leaders and SLM specialists.
Music , dance and drama to sensitize communities on sustainable land management.
Poster and IEC materials to sensitize farmers.
Hands on methods where farmers and other community members learnt by doing.

Stages of implementation: Initiation stage: This involved orientation meeting with community member & leaders to orient them about the project and roles of stakeholders.
Implementation stage; Each stakeholder carried out his/her role. This involved active participation /hand on of the farmers /land users.

Role of stakeholders: Community leaders ; Their role was mobilization of land users.
Farmers/land users: Participation in the implementation of the technology .Resource mobilization (local resources).
SLM Specialists (VI-Agroforestry): Provision of technical advice and information .Decision making, and making IEC materials.

2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点

2.6 该方法的开始和终止日期

2.7 方法的类型

• 基于项目/方案

2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标

The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities (Household income, increased production )

To mobilize land users /community members to find a solution to community problems using community resources.
To sensitize communities on sustainable land management and environmental conservation.

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: The problems include environmental degradation caused by deforestation . Low agricultural production , inadequate wood fuel.

2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件

3.1 该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责

3.2 当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段

	当地土地使用者/当地社区的参与	指定参与人员并描述活动
启动/动机	互动	Local leaders mobilized land users. SLM Specialists sensitized land users & their leaders on SLM .
计划	互动	Land users were involved in information sharing. SLM Specialists provided technical guidance.
实施	互动	SLM Specialists gave technical advice to land users who were involved in active implementation of the project.
监测/评估	互动	The SLM Specialists were involved in M&E in consultation with land users.
Research	无	No research was conducted.

3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策

具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:

• 主要是土地使用者，由SLM专家提供支持

解释:

The decision on the SLM technology choice was made by land users under the guidance of SLM specialists.

Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by mainly by SLM specialists with consultation of land users. The decision on the method of implementing the SLM technology was largely made by SLM specialists in consultation of the land users and their leaders.

4.1 能力建设/培训

是否为土地使用者/其他利益相关者提供培训？:

是

明确受训人员:

• 土地使用者

• Village leaders.

如果相关，请说明性别、年龄、地位、种族等。:

The training involved both men and women of working age.

培训形式:

• 在职
• 农民对农民

涵盖的主题:

Agroforestry and its significance in conservation, Climate change , Afforestation.

4.2 咨询服务

土地使用者有权使用咨询服务吗？:

是

指明是否提供了咨询服务:

• 在土地使用者的土地上

说明/注释:

Name of method used for advisory service: Extension; Key elements: Technical advice. , Community empowerment.

Advisory service is inadequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; There is not enough advisory services to contribute to sustainable land conservation activities . There is one extension staff for each sub county who is not facilitated to visit the farmers.

4.3 机构强化（组织发展）

是否通过这种方法建立或加强了机构？:

• 是，适度

具体说明机构的强化或建立程度:

• 本地

具体说明支持类型:

• 能力建设/培训

提供进一步细节:

Village leaders.

4.4 监测和评估

监测和评估是该方法的一部分吗？:

是

注释:

technical aspects were regular monitored by project staff through measurements; indicators: Goals and objectives

economic / production aspects were regular monitored by project staff through observations; indicators: increased output and household income.

no. of land users involved aspects were ad hoc monitored by land users through observations; indicators: No. of male and female involved.

There were few changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation: Yes there were few changes in the approach .e.g.. the consultations of land users in planning and monitoring of the SLM approach.

There were no changes in the Technology as a result of monitoring and evaluation

5.1 该方法中SLM组成部分的年度预算

如果不知道准确的年度预算，请给出一个范围:

• 10,000-100,000

注释（例如主要的资助来源/主要捐助者）:

Approach costs were met by the following donors: international non-government (VI-Agroforestry): 40.0%; local government (district, county, municipality, village etc) (Village councils): 5.0%; local community / land user(s) (Farmers): 55.0%

5.2 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援

土地使用者是否获得实施该技术的财政/物质支持？:

是

5.3 对特定投入的补贴（包括劳动力）

• 其它

如果土地使用者的劳动力是一项重要的投入，那么是不是:

• 以现金支付

注释:

Casual laborers paid in cash on a salary basis.

The SLM Specialists only financed software activities like trainings.

5.4 信用

是否根据SLM活动的方法给予信用值？:

否

6.1 方法的影响

6.2 土地使用者实施SLM的主要动机

6.3 方法活动的可持续性

土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施（无外部支持的情况下）？:

• 是

若是，请说明如何维持:

Through community and farmers groups, and through community resource mobilization.

6.4 该方法的长处/优点

土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会
The approach encourages involvement of farmers and other land users (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Increased involvement of farmers /land users in all stages of projects. )
The approach units the land user towards fighting community problems. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Deployment of more extension and advisory officers to work with land users. )

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
It enhances peoples participation. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Increased active participation of land users in all stages of the project. )
The approach encourages community resource mobilization. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Supplementing community resources with external support and subsidies. )
The approach encourages capacity building of land users. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Farmer field schools to enhance participatory learning that will lead to project sustainability. )

6.5 该方法的弱点/缺点以及克服它们的方法

土地使用者认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
Inadequate external support for SLM activities.	Provide adequate external support to supplement local resources to enhance SLM activities.
Inadequate training and awareness of SLM activities.	More training and awareness creation on SLM activities through IEC materials like posters.

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
The approach did not involve external support & subsidies to enhance local resources.	Providing subsidies & external support to enhance local community resources.
The training was short and had little lasting impact to SLM land users.	Setting up farmer field schools to provide participatory learning to land users.
The approach dis not involve research on various aspects of the approach and technology.	Conduct research before implementation of the project.

7.1 方法/信息来源

7.2 参考可用出版物

标题、作者、年份、ISBN:

Rakai District Developement Plan 2010-2013 Rakai District Statistical Report 2009Natural Resources Evironmentaal Action Plan

标题、作者、年份、ISBN:

Rakai District Statistical Report 2009

标题、作者、年份、ISBN:

Natural Resources Environmental Action Plan