方法

Individual experimental farmer: Tivington [英国]

approaches_2638 - 英国

完整性: 61%

1. 一般信息

1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

关键资源人员

SLM专业人员:
SLM专业人员:
有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称(如相关)
SOWAP (SOWAP) - 匈牙利

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

1.4 SLM技术问卷的参考

2. SLM方法的描述

2.1 该方法的简要说明

Individual farmer experimenting with machinery to maintain economic viability and reduce time spent on land preparation.

2.2 该方法的详细说明

该方法的详细说明:

Aims / objectives: Maintain economic viability; to reduce the time spent working the soil; set up business with a neighbouring farmer.

Methods: Experimentation with different machinery, seeking information from various sources (agricultural shows, demonstrations, discussions).

Stages of implementation: Experimentation with machinery and collection of information over 3-4years; merger of farm business with neighbour having taken agronomic and financial advice; joint venture set up in 2002 and new machinery bought.

2.3 该方法的照片

2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点

国家:

英国

区域/州/省:

Somerset

2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标

The Approach focused mainly on other activities than SLM (economic viability)

To find appropriate machinery, farming system and business model for economic viability

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: Economic viability.

2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件

社会/文化/宗教规范和价值观
  • 阻碍

Local tradition to plough land on set date

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Willingess to try new techniques and not get discouraged by failure

财务资源和服务的可用性/可得性
  • 阻碍

cost of new machinery

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Willingness to use and adapt existing machinery. Formation of joint venture with neighbouring farmer

了解SLM,获得技术支持
  • 阻碍

Lack of local technical knowledge and advice.

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Sought information from a variety of sources eg agricultural shows, machinery manufacturers

3. 相关利益相关者的参与和角色

3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策

具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:
  • 仅限土地使用者(自主)
解释:

Single land user

Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by by land users* alone (self-initiative / bottom-up). Single land user

4. 技术支持、能力建设和知识管理

4.3 机构强化(组织发展)

是否通过这种方法建立或加强了机构?:

4.4 监测和评估

监测和评估是该方法的一部分吗?:

注释:

bio-physical aspects were ad hoc monitored through observations

technical aspects were ad hoc monitored through observations

economic / production aspects were ad hoc monitored through observations

There were no changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation

5. 融资和外部物质支持

5.2 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援

土地使用者是否获得实施该技术的财政/物质支持?:

5.3 对特定投入的补贴(包括劳动力)

如果土地使用者的劳动力是一项重要的投入,那么是不是:
  • 自愿

5.4 信用

是否根据SLM活动的方法给予信用值?:

6. 影响分析和结论性陈述

6.1 方法的影响

该方法是否帮助土地使用者实施和维护SLM技术?:
  • 是,很少
  • 是,中等
  • 是,支持力度很大

Reduction in soil erosion

该方法是否有助于社会和经济弱势群体?:
  • 是,很少
  • 是,中等
  • 是,支持力度很大

low - not appropriate for local conditions

6.3 方法活动的可持续性

土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施(无外部支持的情况下)?:

6.4 该方法的长处/优点

土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会
Bottom-up approach
编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
Self-starter (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: provision of external advice and knowledge to continue progress)

6.5 该方法的弱点/缺点以及克服它们的方法

土地使用者认为的弱点/缺点/风险 如何克服它们?
Too much trial and error Better provision of advice and knowledge
编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险 如何克服它们?
Dependent on the individual Encourage farmers to work together. Farmer to farmer training

7. 参考和链接

7.1 方法/信息来源

  • 实地考察、实地调查
  • 与土地使用者的访谈

模块