1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的项目名称（如相关）

Scaling-up SLM practices by smallholder farmers (IFAD)

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称（如相关）

National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute (NAFRI) - 老挝人民民主共和国

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

（现场）数据是什么时候汇编的？:

31/08/2017

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

是

2.1 该方法的简要说明

The disaster risk reduction project in upland communities aims to increase understanding about disaster management, disaster risk reduction, and community resilience. The main activities include emergency response during floods/droughts, reduction of impacts from disease outbreaks, livestock revolving funds, and village rice banks.

2.2 该方法的详细说明

该方法的详细说明:

The disaster risk reduction project in upland communities was established after the Ketsana typhoon hit the southern region of Lao PDR in 2008, causing significant losses to assets, infrastructure, and agricultural land. The project was approved by the Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare, and Ministry of Planning and Investment to be implemented at community level through a project steering committee which included the deputy provincial governor. The district governor was the project director at the local level based on an action plan developed by the ministries concerned with assistance from Oxfam Australia. This action plan was aimed at disaster prevention and control. The project coordinators came from the relevant government agencies including the District Labour and Social Welfare Office, the District Agriculture and Forestry Office, the District Administration Office, the District Health Office, the District of Natural Resources and Environment Office, and mass organizations (Women’s Union, Youth Union, Trades Union, and Lao Front for National Construction). The key project aims are to increase understanding about disaster management, disaster risk reduction, and community resilience. The main activities to be implemented include emergency response during floods/droughts, reduction of impacts from disease outbreaks, livestock revolving funds, and village rice banks. In the agriculture sector, the project promotes integrated crop cultivation (maize, beans, lemons, etc), a particular rice planting method termed SRI (System of Rice Intensification), and household gardens. In addition, Oxfam Australia and the local government of Lao PDR in cooperation with Care International (Xekong Province), and the World Food Programme provided emergency response and relief, and sanitation. Although there are a number of organizations which have contributed to disaster risk reduction and emergency response, constraints remain such as the implementation of limited life projects, inadequate funding, and a lack of coordination in the province and districts.. Village Committees for Disaster Prevention and Control have been established with regular meetings and disaster awareness campaign activities implemented. The project outcomes demonstrated that the communities are satisfied with their active participation.

2.3 该方法的照片

2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点

2.6 该方法的开始和终止日期

2.7 方法的类型

• 基于项目/方案

2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标

The objectives of the project are to increase understanding about disaster management, disaster risk reduction, and community development in disaster impacted areas.

2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件

3.1 该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责

3.2 当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段

	当地土地使用者/当地社区的参与	指定参与人员并描述活动
启动/动机	互动
计划	互动
实施	互动
监测/评估	互动
Field exchange	互动	Facilitate 20 staff and training on disaster management and 7 farmers from each village conducted the field exchange on rice production technologies.

3.3 流程图（如可用）

3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策

具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:

• 所有相关参与者，作为参与式方法的一部分

明确做出决策的依据:

• 对充分记录的SLM知识进行评估（基于证据的决策）
• 个人经验和意见（无记录）

4.1 能力建设/培训

是否为土地使用者/其他利益相关者提供培训？:

是

明确受训人员:

• 土地使用者
• 现场工作人员/顾问

培训形式:

• 在职
• 农民对农民

涵盖的主题:

The fund management, water supply uses, rice bank, veterinary, chicken raising, aquaculture, rice production, disaster risk preparedness and response, typhoon, forest fires, disaster warning equipment.

4.2 咨询服务

土地使用者有权使用咨询服务吗？:

是

指明是否提供了咨询服务:

• 在土地使用者的土地上

说明/注释:

Once per month

4.3 机构强化（组织发展）

是否通过这种方法建立或加强了机构？:

• 是，适度

具体说明机构的强化或建立程度:

• 本地

说明机构、角色和职责、成员等。:

The district and village committees for disaster prevention and control are responsible for supervising, acting as focal points and reporting to the provincial and central levels.

具体说明支持类型:

• 财务
• 能力建设/培训
• 设备

4.4 监测和评估

监测和评估是该方法的一部分吗？:

是

注释:

The M&E team of the Oxfam project organized a monthly monitoring meeting involving collaboration with the community board at village and district levels.

若是，该文件是否用于监测和评估？:

是

4.5 研究

研究是该方法的一部分吗?

是

明确话题:

• 技术

提供进一步的细节，并指出是谁做的研究:

A number of potentially appropriate activities have been modified to fit local conditions, such as: promotion economics / marketing of animal breeds that people never raised before.

5.1 该方法中SLM组成部分的年度预算

说明该方法中SLM部分的年度预算，单位为美元:

100000.00

如果不知道准确的年度预算，请给出一个范围:

• 10,000-100,000

注释（例如主要的资助来源/主要捐助者）:

AUSAid funding source

5.2 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援

土地使用者是否获得实施该技术的财政/物质支持？:

是

如果是，请具体说明支持的类型、条件和提供者:

Financial supported by AUSAid and implemented by Oxfam Australia

5.3 对特定投入的补贴（包括劳动力）

• 劳动力

• 建筑

• 基建

如果土地使用者的劳动力是一项重要的投入，那么是不是:

• 以粮换工

5.4 信用

是否根据SLM活动的方法给予信用值？:

否

5.5 其它激励或手段

是否有其他激励措施或工具用于促进SLM技术的实施？:

否

6.1 方法的影响

6.2 土地使用者实施SLM的主要动机

6.3 方法活动的可持续性

土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施（无外部支持的情况下）？:

• 是

若是，请说明如何维持:

The rice production and animal breeding groups are able to maintain their initiatives. Gravity fed water supply system, school, road have been supported by other development organizations.

6.4 该方法的长处/优点

土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会
Project implementation plan is parallel with the district development strategy and meets the needs of local people.
Build understanding on project management, project coordination in each level.
Continuous project monitoring for approximately 3 – 5 years.
Mobilization for participation in activities.

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
The project apply the participatory approach from early stage until monitoring phase.
Promotion of all concerned agencies and offices.
Detailed assessment for capacity building in planning for equipment/material supply, vehicles, staff visit the villages regularly.

6.5 该方法的弱点/缺点以及克服它们的方法

土地使用者认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
The staff lack appropriate knowledge and skills	Provide more training on technical knowledges and skills and other relevant topics.
There is still a large gap to understanding on certain topics between officials and local communities.	On-the-job training, use video as a means for communication to increase local people’s understanding.
Dependency on project and government to implement activities.
Some immoral traditional and cultural beliefs are still hindering development efforts.	It is recommended to increase awareness of village elders who can then influence the local people.

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
Lack of financial resources to monitor project activities.
There were issues with repayment to village development fund, animal revolving fund in order to rotate to other households.	The need to have a robust contract and revise regulations.
Delayed supply of materials which is impact to late activity implementation.
Hand over of responsibilities to persons with insufficient capability.	Consider to transfer the activity to local implementers.

7.1 方法/信息来源