Подходы

Improving productivity of fruit trees through development beekeeping sector [Таджикистан]

Бехтар намудани самарраи дарахтони мевадиханда таввасути занбурпарвари

approaches_3887 - Таджикистан

Просмотреть разделы

Развернуть все
Завершённость: 94%

1. Общая информация

1.2 Контактные данные специалистов и организаций, участвующих в описании и оценке Подхода

Ответственный (-ые) специалист (-ы)

Специалист по УЗП:

Название проекта, содействовавшего документированию/оценке Подхода (если применимо)
Environmental Land Management and Rural Livelihoods (ELMAR)
Название организации (-ий), содействовавших документированию/оценке Подхода (если применимо)
Committee for Environment Protection of Tajikistan (Committee for Environment Protection of Tajikistan) - Таджикистан

1.3 Условия, регламентирующие использование собранных ВОКАТ данных

Когда были собраны данные (на местах)?

22/06/2018

Составитель и ответственный/-ые специалист(-ы) согласны с условиями, регламентирующими использование собранных ВОКАТ данных:

Да

2. Описание Подхода УЗП

2.1 Краткое описание Подхода

Honeybee keeping improves pollination of trees, shrubs, and crops, which will increase the productivity of orchards, arable lands, grassland

2.2 Подробное описание Подхода

Подробное описание Подхода:

Beekeeping provides an opportunity to improve the economic use and ecosystem sanitation in the future. On the one hand, honeybee keeping improves pollination of trees, shrubs and crops, which will increase the productivity of orchards, arable lands, grassland and highland areas also households got high-quality honey and income. In addition, an approach is supporting households using the existing natural features, population improved their living standards by increasing the production of environmentally sound and high-quality honey, then sold at local markets.

Shaidon village has 238 households and 1651 people are living. Shaidon village is located at a distance of 35 km from the district center. According to statistics, the area of land used in the village is 886 hectares. Of these, 60 hectares are household plots, 26 hectares are private farms and 800 hectares occupy pastures. The population is engaged in breeding 470 heads of neat cattle, 520 heads of small cattle, 5 horses, 120 donkeys, 460 chickens and 60 turkeys. On average, each household has 0.08 ha of plots. The soil in the village is included in the category of gray soil. The annual rainfall in the village is up to 700 mm. Winter lasts for 3 months. The terrain is flat, the source of drinking water is groundwater and natural water resources.

An approach supported on behalf of the ELMARL Project. Shaidon village has expanded and favorable opportunities for the development of the beekeeping sector. and bee families were provided to 25 households that are the CIG members. And the CIG members considers that it necessary to strengthen the productivity of fruit trees in the village, through the development of beekeeping sector, as the result provided bee colonies (hives), appropriate uniforms and supplies, wax and medicines, so that ensure the production of ecologically pure honey, the appearance of additional income and new working places. Farmers have purchased the following units under the Project: 25 hives, 25 bee colonies, 1 pc. smothe king device, 1 pc. special device for collecting honey, 15 pcs. protective clothing, 150 kg of sugar and medicines the purchase of which as well transportation of hives and bee families from Khatlon region were funded by the Project. Arrangement, moving and care of bees is assigned to the farmers.

2.3 Фотографии, иллюстрирующие Подход

Медиа-галерея

Общие замечания к фотографиям:

Shaidon village has expanded and favorable opportunities for the development of the beekeeping sector

2.5 Страна/ регион/ место, где применялся Подход

Страна:

Таджикистан

Административная единица (Район/Область):

Kulob Region, Baljuvon District

Более точная привязка места:

Sari Khosor jamoat, Shaidon village

Комментарии:

The approach will be implemented in the Shaidon village

Предварительный просмотр карты

2.6 Даты начала и окончания реализации Подхода

Год начала реализации:

2016

Год окончания (Если Подход больше не применяется):

2017

Комментарии:

This approach has been implemented on a project base and during the 2 years monitored and controlled. The CIG gives this responsibility and will manage and maintain it in future

2.7 Тип Подхода

  • в рамках проекта/ программы

2.8 Каковы цели/ задачи Подхода

Enhancing productivity of the orchards, arable lands, grassland and highland areas and improve the economic use and ecosystem sanitation in the future by developing beekeeping

2.9 Условия содействующие применению Технологии/ Технологий в рамках Подхода или затрудняющие его

Социальные/ культурные/ религиозные нормы и ценности
  • содействуют

Before the project people besides the income did not think about the other issues like environment and productiveness of the orchards and agriculture lands
Proposed approach change their minds to think broader, through supporting them with the training and also beekeeping equipment

Наличие/ доступность финансовых ресурсов и услуг
  • содействуют

For now not

But in the near future, they will have the opportunity for the availability of the income, as the group trying to increase the number of the beehives.

Институциональные условия
  • содействуют

The CIG group is formed and will manage and maintain the approach

Осведомленность в области УЗП, доступность технической поддержки
  • затрудняют

Lack of knowledge on SLM approaches and technologies

Organised and provided the different type of SLM relative trainings on behalf of the project but iy is steel an issue

3. Участие и распределение ролей заинтересованных сторон

3.1 Заинтересованные стороны, участвующие в реализации Подхода и их роли

  • местные землепользователи/ местные сообщества

CIG members (local farmers)

Local farmers prioritized investments based on a fixed budget for each type of rural investment determined by the number of households. Within a plan of action, participants decided on the allocation of investments to groups of households using rules that limit the funding for any one household.
All activities, including PRA, training and investment subprojects involved men and women with due a diligence. Social safety was assured for the people with disabilities, who participated in rural livelihoods activities and had equal rights and voices.

  • эксперты по УЗП/ сельскому хозяйству

Facilitating organizations and academy of science

Representatives from the facilitating organizations and professors (as TOT trainers) from the Institutions and academies involved during the training

  • местные власти

Jamoat representative, Hukumat of the district departments

Jamoat representatives were involved in Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) that was used as the main pre-assessment mechanism to analyze the socio-economic and environmental situation in the selected pilots,
The RRC(Rayon Review Committee) will consider the combination of proposed sub-projects within the overall context of the rayon and project. The committee will review and accept proposals that meet project guidelines and provide clearance to the Project Staff for the release of project funding to the accounts of relevant CIGs.

3.2 Участие местных землепользователей/ местных сообществ на разных стадиях реализации Подхода
Участие местных землепользователей/ местных сообществ Перечислите участников и опишите их вовлеченность
планирование пассивное Project beneficiaries (CIG Members) interviewed and consulted during the social assessment conducted in the project design process which then influenced project approaches.
выполнение интерактивное Villagers (CIG Members) made grant allocation decisions. CIGs managed grant funds and purchased needed materials and products individually
мониторинг/ оценка пассивное CIGs participated during the monitoring activity

3.3 Схема реализации (если имеется)

Описание:

Here is the key steps and actors in the planning and implementation of rural investments. Not all possible participants in these steps are included since local situations may vary and will need to be taken into account during planning and implementation.

Автор:

ELMARL POM

3.4 Принятие решений по выбору Технологии/ Технологий УЗП

Укажите, кто принимал решение по выбору применяемой Технологии/ Технологий:
  • в основном землепользователи при поддержке специалистов по УЗП
Поясните:

Villagers prioritized investments based on a fixed budget for each type of rural investment determined by the number of households. Within a plan of action, participants decided on the allocation of investments to groups of households (Common Interest Groups, CIGs) using rules that limit the funding for any one household.

Поясните на чём было основано принятие решений:
  • анализ подробно описанного опыта и знаний по УЗП (принятие решений на основе подтвержденных фактов)

4. Техническая поддержка, повышение компетенций и управление знаниями

4.1 Повышение компетенций/ обучение

Проводилось ли обучение землепользователей/ других заинтересованных лиц?

Да

Укажите, кто проходил обучение:
  • землепользователи
  • местный персонал/консультанты
Если существенно, укажите гендерный и возрастной состав, статус, этническую принадлежность и т.д.

Specialists from the FOs used mechanisms that provided full participation, women, and men in all sessions

Тип обучения:
  • в ходе работы
  • обмен опытом между фермерами
Рассматриваемые темы:

Grant allocation mechanisms. Fund flow arrangements, management and technical, SLM training

Комментарии:

Training included such king themes;
composting, mulching, managing salinization, intercropping on slopes, drip irrigation, low-cost watering techniques, solar greenhouses, drought-resistant crops, bee-keeping, mixed fruit orchards, local varieties nurseries, rotational grazing, Livestock breeding and maintaining, strategic watering points, use of perennial forage, solar energy technologies, marketing options and opportunities

4.2 Консультационные услуги

Есть ли у землепользователей возможность получать консультации?

Да

Укажите, где именно оказываются консультационные услуги:
  • в постоянно функционирующих центрах
Описание/ комментарий:

Jamoat reprezentatives advise CIG members and support them in realisation their plans

4.3 Институциональная (организационная) поддержка

В ходе реализации Подхода были ли организованы новые институциональные структуры или поддержаны уже существующие?
  • да, немного
Укажите уровень, на котором структуры были укреплены или вновь созданы:
  • местные
Опишите организацию, функции и ответственность, членство и т.д.

The Common Interest Groups formed in the villages on behalf households and enhanced their knowledge. And the project provides small-scale grants at the village level for groups of households (CIG) to implement rural production and land management investments, as well as related small-scale infrastructure investments. Villages prioritized investments based on a fixed budget for each type of rural investment, determined by the number of households.

Укажите тип поддержки:
  • финансовая
  • повышение компетенций/ обучение
Подробнее:

Project-financed grants to CIGs for each investment under categories of rural production and land management investments, as well as related small-scale infrastructure investments that will not exceed US$7,000 and will require a match of 25% in beneficiary contributions which may be in cash or in-kind

4.4 Мониторинг и оценка

Являются ли мониторинг и оценка частью Подхода?

Да

Комментарии:

Grant allocation, number of beneficiaries, Estimated costs of rural investments, environmental aspects, management of the investments

Если да, будет ли данный документ использоваться для мониторинга и оценки?

Да

Комментарии:

Rural investment monitoring should focus on the range of issues relevant to subproject sustainability, including environmental, social and economic. FOs build CIG capacities to monitor these aspects and to adapt to changing conditions.

4.5 Научные исследования

Были ли научные исследования частью Подхода?

Нет

5. Финансирование и внешняя материальная поддержка

5.1 Годовой бюджет мероприятий по УЗП в рамках Подхода

Если точный годовой бюжет неизвестен, укажите примерный диапазон затрат:
  • 2000-10000
Комментарий (например, основные источники финансирования/ ключевые доноры):

GEF/PPCR through WB

5.2 Финансирование и внешняя материальная поддержка, предоставляемая землепользователям

Предоставлялась ли землепользователям финансовая/ материальная поддержка для применения Технологии /Технологий?

Да

Если да, укажите тип(-ы) поддержки, кто ее предоставил и условия предоставления:

The project provided small-scale grants at the village level for groups of households to implement rural production and land management investments, as well as related small-scale
infrastructure investments.Villages prioritized investments based on a fixed budget for each type of rural investment, determined by the number of households.

Mechanism: The Common Interest Groups formed at village level on behalf of households and enhanced their knowledge. Further project financed CIG with the small grants under the three main categories of activities that are expected to contribute to their assets and sustainable land management, and increase climate resilience.
An approach/subproject been supported grant amount 7,000 USD and implemented through the Common Interest Group (CIG). CIG have contributed more then 25% from the total approach/subproject amount.

5.3 Субсидии на отдельные затраты (включая оплату труда)

  • нет
 
Если труд землепользователя был существенным вкладом, укажите, был ли этот вклад:
  • добровольный
Комментарии:

As mentioned above beneficiary contribution was in-kind the 25% of the total subproject amount

5.4 Кредитование

Предоставлялись ли в рамках Подхода кредиты на мероприятия УЗП?

Нет

5.5 Другие методы или инструменты стимулирования

Использовались ли другие методы или инструменты стимулирования для продвижения Технологий УЗП?

Да

Если да, поясните:

Study tours, competition farmer to farmer

6. Анализ влияния и заключительные положения

6.1 Влияние Подхода

As a result of the approach, mainly households got high-quality honey, and 25 households got jobs. On the other hand, using the existing natural features, population improved their living standards by increasing the production of environmentally sound and high-quality honey, then sold at local markets. In addition productivity will be increased from the fruit trees and also agriculture lands that will be another income to the local land users.

Сумел ли Подход помочь землепользователям внедрить и поддерживать технологии УЗП?
  • Нет
  • Да, немного
  • Да, умеренно
  • Да, существенно

During the project implementation training and meetings were organized with the CIG (local people) that will give them the opportunity to manage and maintain on hand approach

Сумел ли Подход расширить знания и возможности землепользователей в применении практик УЗП?
  • Нет
  • Да, немного
  • Да, умеренно
  • Да, существенно

All the trainings (composting, mulching, managing salinization, intercropping on slopes, drip irrigation, low-cost watering techniques, solar greenhouses, drought-resistant crops, bee-keeping, mixed fruit orchards, local varieties nurseries, rotational grazing, Livestock breeding and maintaining, strategic watering points, use of perennial forage) that have provided during the project implementation linked somehow to the SLM. And CIG members trying all their best to increase the number of the beehives and expand approach among other villagers

6.2 Основные причины, побуждающие землепользователей внедрять УЗП

  • рост продуктивности

Villagers have expanded and favorable opportunities for the development of beekeeping sector as honeybee keeping improves pollination of trees, shrubs, and crops, which will increase the productivity of orchards, arable lands, grassland and highland areas.a

  • приобретение знаний и опыта в области УЗП

Villagers have expanded and favorable opportunities for the development of beekeeping sector as honeybee keeping improves pollination of trees, shrubs, and crops, which will increase the productivity of orchards, arable lands, grassland and highland areas.

6.3 Долгосрочная устойчивость мероприятий в рамках Подхода

Могут ли землепользователи самостоятельно (без внешней поддержки) продолжать применение того, что было реализовано в рамках Подхода?
  • да
Если да, опишите как:

Because before starting of the project "participatory rural appraisal" within ELMARL project was the first steps to the sustainability because the villagers identify and prioritize development needs. This meaning that from the beginning villagers involved and even by them made grant allocation decisions, also CIGs managed grant funds and bought inputs.. Maintaining actions are in place

6.4 Сильные стороны/ преимущества Подхода

Сильные стороны/ преимущества/ возможности по мнению землепользователей
Sufficient climate of the place and experianced CIG specialists is the garanty of the activity and sustainibility of the approach
Сильные стороны/ преимущества/ возможности по мнению составителя или других ключевых специалистов
Collecting people in one Group(CIG), gives opportunity to do desicions together and expanding approach in the plan
Capacity building events that was organised during the approach, new technologies, new knowledges and so on
Good cooperation with the jamoat

6.5 Слабые стороны/ недостатки Подхода и пути их преодоления

Слабые стороны/ недостатки/ риски по мнению землепользователей Возможные пути их преодоления/снижения?
Bees diseases Needs more training and support on behalf of the district hukumat and projects
Слабые стороны/ недостатки/ риски по мнению составителя или ответственных специалистов Возможные пути их преодоления/снижения?
Market, value chance, preparation of the business plans and other reletive knowledges they need Other coming projects or local hukumat needs to support them

7. Справочные материалы и ссылки

7.1 Методы сбора/источники информации

  • данные, собранные из отчетов и достоверных документов

Existed project documents and reports

7.2 Ссылки на опубликованные материалы

Название, автор, год публикации, ISBN:

ELMARL Annual Report 2017

Где опубликовано? Стоимость?

CEP of RT, free

7.3 Ссылки на материалы, доступные онлайн

Название/ описание:

ELMARL Annual Report 2017

Ссылки и модули

Развернуть все Свернуть все

Модули