方法

Construction of trenches in cropland. [乌干达]

Okuteza ebitaba omu ntokye.

approaches_2663 - 乌干达

完整性: 81%

1. 一般信息

1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

关键资源人员

SLM专业人员:
SLM专业人员:

Nuwamanya Amon

Ntungamo District.

乌干达

SLM专业人员:

Mushabe Joshua

Ntungamo District

乌干达

SLM专业人员:

Tugaine Richard

Ntungamo District

乌干达

SLM专业人员:

Mazimakwo Kukundakwe

Kabale district.

乌干达

SLM专业人员:

Pollina Elijah

Rwerazi matoke association

Kyenteema parish,Rukoni sub county.

乌干达

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的项目名称(如相关)
The Transboundary Agro-ecosystem Management Project for the Kagera River Basin (GEF-FAO / Kagera TAMP )
有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称(如相关)
Kabale District Local Government (Kabale District Local Government) - 乌干达
有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称(如相关)
Ntungamo District - 乌干达

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

(现场)数据是什么时候汇编的?:

30/07/2011

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

1.4 SLM技术问卷的参考

Trenches
technologies

Trenches [乌干达]

Digging trenches on a gentle slope in banana plantation in Rwerazi.

  • 编制者: Wilson Bamwerinde

2. SLM方法的描述

2.1 该方法的简要说明

Farmer field facilitators mobilized and sensitized the land users on the need to control soil erosion in banana plantations and to conserve moisture in the soil.

2.2 该方法的详细说明

该方法的详细说明:

Aims / objectives: -To control soil erosion.
-To conserve soil moisture in the Banana planation.
-To increase bunch size of bananas and increase household incomes.


Methods: -Mobilizing, sensitizing and training land users in the field of SLM technology.
-Group meeting for example Rwerazi matooke association.
-On-farm training by farmer field school facilitators.

Stages of implementation: -Mobilization of land users in farmer field schools.
-Prioritization of land degradation problems with land users.
-Technologies & approaches to mitigate degradation.
-Training land users in trench construction to control soil erosion.
-Monitoring of the trench construction.
-Evaluation of the effectiveness of the trench construction.

Role of stakeholders: -To monitor and evaluate the use of trenches to increase the productivity.
-Enforcing compliance and group cohesion.

Other important information: FAO through Kagera TAMP project extended financial support to address land degradation problems in the project area.

2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点

国家:

乌干达

区域/州/省:

Uganda

有关地点的进一步说明:

Ntungamo

2.6 该方法的开始和终止日期

注明开始年份:

2010

2.7 方法的类型

  • 基于项目/方案

2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标

The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities (Construction of trenches in banana plantation to control top soil run off and conserve moisture. )

-To control soil erosion.
-To conserve soil moisture.
-To mitigate land degradation.
-To increase banana production.

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: -Increase in sheet and rill erosion in cropland.
-Decreasing banana bunch size.
-Declining soil fertility.

2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件

财务资源和服务的可用性/可得性
  • 阻碍

Land user had low income to buy inputs.

Treatment through the SLM Approach: FAO Kagera TAMP project provided financial assistance to some land users after prioritization of the approach to control /mitigate land degradation.

法律框架(土地使用权、土地和水使用权)
  • 启动

The existing land ownership, land use rights / water rights moderately helped the approach implementation: land users had a right to implement the technology in their areas without disturbance.

了解SLM,获得技术支持
  • 阻碍

Land users had little knowledge and skills about SLM technology in question .

Treatment through the SLM Approach: TOT trained farmers and land users to equip them with knowledge and skills.

3. 相关利益相关者的参与和角色

3.1 该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责

  • 当地土地使用者/当地社区

Committee of stakeholders in implementation. Implementers of the approach and technology

Implementers of the approach

  • SLM专家/农业顾问

Executing advisory services.

  • NGO

On programing and developing approach

  • 国家政府(规划者、决策者)
如果涉及多个利益相关者,请注明领导机构:

Specialists together in farmer field school forum

3.2 当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段
当地土地使用者/当地社区的参与 指定参与人员并描述活动
启动/动机 互动 Land users and specialists.
计划 自我动员 planned and involved in farmer field groups.
实施 自我动员 Farmer field school members implemented the approach.
监测/评估 自我动员 selected monitoring and evaluation officer , national steering committee members, specialists, farmer field facilitators & group members.
Research

3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策

具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:
  • 主要是土地使用者,由SLM专家提供支持
解释:

Specialists raised awareness among the land users about the SLM technologies . Land users later opted for trenches. They were supported by FAO Kagera TAMP specialists through trainings and financial assistance.

Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by mainly by land users supported by SLM specialists. After awareness made by specialists the land users took an initiative organized in farmer field schools and implemented the approach.

4. 技术支持、能力建设和知识管理

4.1 能力建设/培训

是否为土地使用者/其他利益相关者提供培训?:

培训形式:
  • 农民对农民
培训形式:
  • Workshops /seminars.
涵盖的主题:

Group formation, SLM practices, Farmer field strengthening.

4.2 咨询服务

土地使用者有权使用咨询服务吗?:

指明是否提供了咨询服务:
  • 在土地使用者的土地上
  • 在固定中心
说明/注释:

Name of method used for advisory service: Training; Key elements: Brainstorming., Participatory problem solving. , Demonstration of technologies.

Advisory service is quite adequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; With the introduction of National agricultural advisory services.

4.3 机构强化(组织发展)

是否通过这种方法建立或加强了机构?:

4.4 监测和评估

监测和评估是该方法的一部分吗?:

注释:

technical aspects were ad hoc monitored by land users through observations; indicators: Are technical specifications met?

economic / production aspects were regular monitored by land users through observations; indicators: Quantity of banana bunch increasing from 20kg /bunch.

no. of land users involved aspects were None monitored by land users through observations; indicators: Is the number of farmers digging trenches increasing or decreasing.

There were few changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation: Some trenches which had been done before monitoring have been remodeled/designed to suit the purpose.

There were few changes in the Technology as a result of monitoring and evaluation: New trenches are constructed on the contour unlike before.

4.5 研究

研究是该方法的一部分吗?

  • AESA
提供进一步的细节,并指出是谁做的研究:

By land users and specialists in farmer field schools on experimental plots in the field.

Research was carried out both on station and on-farm

5. 融资和外部物质支持

5.1 该方法中SLM组成部分的年度预算

如果不知道准确的年度预算,请给出一个范围:
  • < 2,000
注释(例如主要的资助来源/主要捐助者):

Approach costs were met by the following donors: international (FAO &GEF ): 90.0%; local community / land user(s) (land user): 10.0%

5.2 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援

土地使用者是否获得实施该技术的财政/物质支持?:

5.3 对特定投入的补贴(包括劳动力)

  • 设备
具体说明哪些投入得到了补贴 程度如何 对补贴做出具体说明
工具 部分融资
如果土地使用者的劳动力是一项重要的投入,那么是不是:
  • 以现金支付
注释:

Transport refund for meetings, food/lunch on meeting days, payment for some inputs.

FAO & GEF through Kagera TAMP project extended funds to undertake SLM practices e.g. trench construction.

5.4 信用

是否根据SLM活动的方法给予信用值?:

请具体指明信贷接收人:

Some land users like Polina Eliah

6. 影响分析和结论性陈述

6.1 方法的影响

该方法是否帮助土地使用者实施和维护SLM技术?:
  • 是,很少
  • 是,中等
  • 是,支持力度很大

Improved drainage during rainy season , controlled water runoffs, improved dispersed and conversion of water.

该方法是否有助于社会和经济弱势群体?:
  • 是,很少
  • 是,中等
  • 是,支持力度很大

No group of disadvantaged was pronounced.

Did other land users / projects adopt the Approach?
  • 是,很少
  • 是,中等
  • 是,支持力度很大

The once 50 land users increased to 100 users adopting approach. Neighbors trying to adopt the approach.

Did the Approach lead to improved livelihoods / human well-being?
  • 是,很少
  • 是,中等
  • 是,支持力度很大

Food security ,improved income and access to basic needs.

Did the Approach help to alleviate poverty?
  • 是,很少
  • 是,中等
  • 是,支持力度很大

Food security , enough income to buy basic needs, poor people paid for labour and employment.

6.2 土地使用者实施SLM的主要动机

  • 增加生产

To increase productivity.

  • 增加利润(能力),提高成本效益比

Income more than costs.

  • 规章制度(罚款)/执行

Rwerazi group cohesion.

6.3 方法活动的可持续性

土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施(无外部支持的情况下)?:
若是,请说明如何维持:

The farmer field schools are incorporated into NAADS and the NAADS will continue to mobilize the school members until co-operative union is formed to help bulk marketing of bananas.

6.4 该方法的长处/优点

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
1. Active farmer field school. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Formation learning & saving groups among farmer field schools. )
2. Group marketing of matoke. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Group marketing on behalf of members. )

6.5 该方法的弱点/缺点以及克服它们的方法

土地使用者认为的弱点/缺点/风险 如何克服它们?
1. High costs of maintenance of trenches. maintenance of trenches be done after short regular intervals before a lot of work is required.
编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险 如何克服它们?
1. Trenches require regular maintenance costs. maintenance be done at short regular intervals before much money is required.

7. 参考和链接

7.1 方法/信息来源

  • 实地考察、实地调查
  • 与土地使用者的访谈

模块