Approches

Indigenous knowledge transfer [Tanzanie]

  • Création :
  • Mise à jour :
  • Compilateur :
  • Rédacteur :
  • Examinateur :

Emikolele n'emyegesheleze. (HAYA)

approaches_2472 - Tanzanie

État complet : 89%

1. Informations générales

1.2 Coordonnées des personnes-ressources et des institutions impliquées dans l'évaluation et la documentation de l'Approche

Personne(s) ressource(s) clé(s)

Spécialiste GDT:
Spécialiste GDT:
Spécialiste GDT:
Spécialiste GDT:

Kaihura Fidelis

Kagera TAMP Project, National Project Manager

Tanzanie

Nom du projet qui a facilité la documentation/ l'évaluation de l'Approche (si pertinent)
The Transboundary Agro-ecosystem Management Project for the Kagera River Basin (GEF-FAO / Kagera TAMP )
Nom du ou des institutions qui ont facilité la documentation/ l'évaluation de l'Approche (si pertinent)
Bukoba district council (Bukoba district council) - Tanzanie
Nom du ou des institutions qui ont facilité la documentation/ l'évaluation de l'Approche (si pertinent)
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO Food and Agriculture Organization) - Italie

1.3 Conditions relatives à l'utilisation par WOCAT des données documentées

Quand les données ont-elles été compilées (sur le terrain)?

25/05/2012

Le compilateur et la(les) personne(s) ressource(s) acceptent les conditions relatives à l'utilisation par WOCAT des données documentées:

Oui

1.4 Références au(x) questionnaire(s) sur les Technologies de GDT

Buhaya agroforestry system
technologies

Buhaya agroforestry system [Tanzanie]

Traditional agroforestry system comprising mixture of banana, coffee, fruit trees, biannual crops, annual crops and timber trees which together optimize the use of soil, moisture and space.

  • Compilateur : Godfrey Baraba

2. Description de l'Approche de GDT

2.1 Courte description de l'Approche

Indigenous knowledge transfer, is a common phenomena in farming societies whereby elders taught younger generations the practical aspects in production and emphasizes the norms and proms in folk story tales.

2.2 Description détaillée de l'Approche

Description détaillée de l'Approche:

Aims / objectives: The main aim of this approach is to improve agricultural production through collaboration of households and the entire community. The approach ensures food security and income with land conservation. The approach is achieved by voluntary learning from the experienced elder farmers. This is achieved by creation of friendly environmental to implement the learning process. The approach is also characterized by traditional prons and norms of the young generation to inherit the elders property.

Methods: The elders spent evening hours to tell farming stories to the younger generation. These stories refer to the success of soil fertility improvement, water resources accessibility and utilization, land use type and farming practices in the community.
Also, practical aspect is attained by involving the younger generation in porting and allocating the land according to land use type.

Stages of implementation: 1. Experienced farmers telling farming stories to the younger while younger listen and ask questions.
2. The elders ask old sayings and elaborate their meaning.
3. Elders demonstrating to the younger, how farming activity are done.
4. The younger implement farming activity and plan for their future.
5.The land is allocated to the younger according to land use type.
6. The younger farmers now are in the position to train their successors.

Role of stakeholders: The major stakeholders are Clan leaders, Head of households, mother, children and hired labour. The roles of Clan leaders are to organize the farming story sessions to the elders and reinforce traditional land norms and proms. The roles of Head of household are to conduct evening farming stories at homestead, encouraging the younger to practice farming by giving incentive according to performance. The roles of the children and hired labour is to work in the head of household farms and ensure proms and proms abides.

Other important information: Nowdays, the approach succeeded to expand cropland beyond grasslands and forestland.

2.3 Photos de l'approche

2.5 Pays/ région/ lieux où l'Approche a été appliquée

Pays:

Tanzanie

Région/ Etat/ Province:

Tanzania

Autres spécifications du lieu :

Bukoba District

2.7 Type d'Approche

  • traditionnel/ autochtone

2.8 Principaux objectifs de l'Approche

The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities (Products diversification, livelihood improvements and land resouces inheretence.)

The main aim of the approach is to improve productivity and ensure younger generations productive land ownership and user rights.

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: Lack of knowledge and skills of farm technologies, collaboration between households and community, eroded/weakened traditional norms, land ownership inequalities.

2.9 Conditions favorisant ou entravant la mise en œuvre de la(des) Technologie(s) appliquée(s) sous l'Approche

normes et valeurs sociales/ culturelles/ religieuses
  • entrave

Land ownership inequalities, whereby women and girls are not allowed to inheret the clan land.


Treatment through the SLM Approach: Improve women participation in decision making

disponibilité/ accès aux ressources et services financiers
  • entrave

Farming activities regarded as volatile assets by most financial institutions

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Introduce and impliment subsidies policy.

cadre institutionnel
  • entrave

The clan leaders not strong in terms of formal training. Weak reinforcement of laws and bylaws.

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Use extension service staffs to promote informal training.

cadre juridique (régime foncier, droits d'utilisation des terres et de l'eau)
  • favorise

The existing land ownership, land use rights / water rights moderately helped the approach implementation: Individual land ownership without lease smoothing the transfer of land from one parents to offspring. therefore assured perfect training grounds

  • entrave

Community not well knowledgeable on land laws.

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Train village land law to the community.

connaissances sur la GDT, accès aux supports techniques
  • entrave

Lack of farming technologies transfer.

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Facilitate extension services.

autre
  • entrave

Some plant spps habours pests

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Planting of pecit repelant species. eg Kajaye

3. Participation et rôles des parties prenantes impliquées dans l'Approche

3.1 Parties prenantes impliquées dans l'Approche et rôles

  • exploitants locaux des terres / communautés locales

Household and hired laborers

Adoption farmers tends to use grups for socilization and participation. The difference between the participation of men and women is that, women train children only, while men can also train hired laborers. Hired labour normally spent the day while folk story conducted at night. Labourers including men and women are disposal to men trainings.Women participate in training at all stages but are not involved in land allocation to the younger generations. Women: Have the rights to produce annual crops and decide on the income from it.
Younger: Are assured of land inheritance from their parents.
laboures: Are paid at the market price.
Poor households: assured food security as work for food, informal land renting i.e paying back the prorate produce.

  • gouvernement local

Provides extension services for up scaling the aproach.

3.2 Participation des exploitants locaux des terres/ communautés locales aux différentes phases de l'Approche
Participation des exploitants locaux des terres/ communautés locales Spécifiez qui était impliqué et décrivez les activités
initiation/ motivation auto-mobilisation Household members. To attend and particiapte in appropriate sessions.
planification auto-mobilisation Clan leaders: To identify and select problems and find solutios Head of Household: Children. Siblings: Hired labour:
mise en œuvre auto-mobilisation Head of the clan: To organise the sittings. Head of Household:To inform the family and conduct the dialogue Children: To participate in farm production, aceptance of allocated land, Using the located land according to land use type. Siblings: To facilitate divison of labour Hired labor:
suivi/ évaluation aucun Clan head: To call the meeting Community leaders: To visit farms and other land, To observe and deliver the assessments.
Research passive Few farmers participated in adaptive resarch on Kibanja system 1n 1993.

3.3 Diagramme/ organigramme (si disponible)

Description:

Actors within the Indigenous knowledge transfer approach

Auteur:

Godfrey Baraba

3.4 Prises de décision pour la sélection de la Technologie/ des Technologies

Indiquez qui a décidé de la sélection de la Technologie/ des Technologies à mettre en œuvre:
  • principalement les exploitants des terres soutenus par des spécialistes de la GDT
Expliquez:

Indigenous trainings are formalized by extension staffs. Coffee and Vanilla buyers tends to supervise farms for products assurance.

Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by mainly by land users supported by SLM specialists. Extension staffs monitor, evaluate and advise the proper methods up scaling.

4. Soutien technique, renforcement des capacités et gestion des connaissances

4.1 Renforcement des capacités/ formation

Une formation a-t-elle été dispensée aux exploitants des terres/ autres parties prenantes?

Oui

4.2 Service de conseils

Les exploitants des terres ont-ils accès à un service de conseils?

Oui

Spécifiez si le service de conseils est fourni:
  • dans les champs des exploitants?
Décrivez/ commentez:

Name of method used for advisory service: Train and Visit (T&V); Key elements: Subject Matter Specialist trin field staff on fortnight bases. Field staff visit Progressive farmers and train them, Field Staffs visit Farmers to assess the performance and give feed back to Subject Matter Specialist; The method is very effective under a strong economical situation.

Advisory service is inadequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; Farmer field schools can't reach farming communities with extension staffs based on Ward level.

4.3 Renforcement des institutions (développement organisationnel)

Des institutions ont elles été mises en place ou renforcées par le biais de l'Approche?
  • oui, un peu
Spécifiez à quel(s) niveau(x), ces institutions ont été renforcées ou mises en place:
  • local
  • Agricultural advisory services.

4.4 Suivi et évaluation

Le suivi et l'évaluation font ils partie de l'Approche? :

Oui

Commentaires:

bio-physical aspects were regular monitored by land users through observations; indicators: activities according to the season.

bio-physical aspects were ad hoc monitored by land users through measurements; indicators: Customary land law, land inheretance protocals.

socio-cultural aspects were regular monitored by land users through observations; indicators: Harvesting season

socio-cultural aspects were ad hoc monitored by other through measurements

economic / production aspects were regular monitored by land users through observations

management of Approach aspects were regular monitored by None through observations

management of Approach aspects were ad hoc monitored by None through measurements

There were few changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation: Monitoring and Evaluation component took very minimal attention.

There were no changes in the Technology as a result of monitoring and evaluation

4.5 Recherche

La recherche a-t-elle fait partie intégrante de l’Approche?

Oui

Donnez plus de détails et indiquez qui a mené ces recherches:

Research was carried out on station

5. Financement et soutien matériel externe

5.1 Budget annuel de la composante GDT de l'Approche

Si le budget annuel précis n'est pas connu, indiquez une fourchette:
  • < 2 000
Commentez (par ex. principales sources de financement/ principaux bailleurs de fonds):

Approach costs were met by the following donors: local community / land user(s): 100.0%

5.2 Soutiens financiers/ matériels fournis aux exploitants des terres

Les exploitants des terres ont-ils reçu un soutien financier/ matériel pour la mise en œuvre de la Technologie/ des Technologies?

Non

5.3 Subventions pour des intrants spécifiques (incluant la main d'œuvre)

Si la main d'œuvre fournie par les exploitants des terres était un intrant substantiel, elle était:
  • volontaire
Commentaires:

Mainly family labour is the major component of input.

5.4 Crédits

Des crédits ont-ils été alloués à travers l'Approche pour les activités de GDT?

Non

5.5 Autres incitations ou instruments

D'autres incitations ou instruments ont-ils été utilisés pour promouvoir la mise en œuvre des Technologies de GDT?

Oui

Si oui, spécifiez:

Agricultural advisory services.

6. Analyses d'impact et conclusions

6.1 Impacts de l'Approche

Est-ce que l'Approche a amélioré les questions foncières et des droits d'utilisation qui entravent la mise en œuvre des Technologies?
  • Non
  • Oui, un peu
  • Oui, modérément
  • Oui, beaucoup

6.2 Principale motivation des exploitants des terres pour mettre en œuvre la GDT

  • augmenter la production

Diversification asure grand production

  • augmenter la rentabilité/ bénéfice, rapport coûts-bénéfices

Implementation costs requires on family labour and commitments

  • règles et règlements (amendes)/ application

Farming land inheritance protocals and land norms enforcement are ver crucial components.

6.3 Durabilité des activités de l'Approche

Les exploitants des terres peuvent-ils poursuivre ce qui a été mis en œuvre par le biais de l'Approche (sans soutien extérieur)?
  • oui
Si oui, décrivez de quelle manière:

It has been in application for very long time, and no signs of retardation observed.

6.4 Points forts/ avantages de l'Approche

Points forts/ avantages/ possibilités du point de vue du compilateur ou d'une autre personne ressource clé
Local resource person, obedience and committed community.

7. Références et liens

7.1 Méthodes/ sources d'information

  • visites de terrain, enquêtes sur le terrain
  • interviews/entretiens avec les exploitants des terres

7.2 Références des publications disponibles

Titre, auteur, année, ISBN:

http://www.fao.org/nr/kagera/en/

Disponible à partir d'où? Coût?

Kagera TAMP project website

Modules