Approches

Participatory Land use planning and assessment [Tadjikistan]

Création : 13 avr. 2018 12:04
Mise à jour : 12 juin 2018 06:15
Compilateur : Askarsho Zevarshoev
Rédacteur : –
Examinateur : Farrukh Nazarmavloev

Накшаи муштараки истифодабари ва бахогузории замин

approaches_3635 - Tadjikistan

Voir les sections

Développer tout

État complet : 92%

1. Informations générales

2. Description de l'Approche de GDT

2.1 Courte description de l'Approche

Participatory Land Use Planning and Assessment is an inter disciplinary approach to the land use with combination of the modern tools and community knowledge to identify land degradations with its intensity and trends and through this approach design intervention directed toward land degradation prevention. This approach also compiles different tools including PRA and soil assessment and LADA techniques in a participatory manner. The approach address issues with all categories of land use including crop and pasture land, forest and even settlement with regards to natural disaster consideration for construction.

2.2 Description détaillée de l'Approche

Description détaillée de l'Approche:

As a precondition to the development of evidence- and needs-based plans, Participatory Land Use Planning and Assessment (PLUPA) will be conducted, with participation of local specialists, to assess sub-watershed natural and human-induced hazards and natural resource conditions, and IHA results will be presented to community and local government stakeholders to foster ownership. The outcome will improve community involvement in development by enhancing the ability to conduct local development planning and implementation.
Attention will be given to promoting the role of women in local development.
The PLUPA will employ terrestrial inspection of the land using simplified tools based on the WOCAT questionnaire for the land management technologies. The field-based assessment will include physical inspection of the land use and collecting necessary data like GPS points and information on target watershed (e.g. availability of pastureland, natural hazards, public and private infrastructure). The remote sensing component will be used for analyzing images and identification of trend analysis as well erosion on soil, land degradation.
Communities (via CSOs) and local governments are involved in conducting PLUPA, and will drive and own the result for development of their plan at watershed level. They will also be core stakeholders in the prioritization of water, health, and NRM interventions as per watershed management plan, and will be partners and contributors (including financially) in construction and management of new infrastructure post-project. This fosters commitment and ownership, promoting development that is accountable, participatory, inclusive, transparent, and efficient.

2.3 Photos de l'approche

Galerie Médias

Remarques générales concernant les photos:

Two sample of soils from one plot where the land used for different purposes

2.5 Pays/ région/ lieux où l'Approche a été appliquée

Pays:

Tadjikistan

2.6 Dates de début et de fin de l'Approche

Si l'année précise est inconnue, indiquez approximativement quand l'Approche a démarré:

il y a moins de 10 ans (récemment)

2.7 Type d'Approche

fondé sur un projet/ programme

2.8 Principaux objectifs de l'Approche

The main goal of the approach is to bring together stakeholders to use simplified methods on soil assessment and raise awareness on the importance of soil health for production. Based on that approach communities will design action for better management of their land and soil conservaiton

2.9 Conditions favorisant ou entravant la mise en œuvre de la(des) Technologie(s) appliquée(s) sous l'Approche

normes et valeurs sociales/ culturelles/ religieuses

entrave

people are not organized well and land use planning is taking place on a add-hoc basis. traditional knowledge, which is bind to local culture and social norms is lost with applying pre-modern agriculture practice for what community does not have proper access to resources, such as inputs and tehcnology

cadre institutionnel

favorise

cadre juridique (régime foncier, droits d'utilisation des terres et de l'eau)

favorise

farmers are organized in a legal structure, which is make them compliant to the land rights and supported with planning for land use

connaissances sur la GDT, accès aux supports techniques

entrave

not all farmers, which got land have farming knowledge and practices on SLM. Basic practices which they learn from other farmer or inherited from their generation.

marchés (pour acheter les intrants, vendre les produits) et prix

favorise

there is a lot of demand for food products in the markets and existing service providers who supply inputs. If land use planning is organized in a good way community will get good benefit from farming.

3. Participation et rôles des parties prenantes impliquées dans l'Approche

3.1 Parties prenantes impliquées dans l'Approche et rôles

exploitants locaux des terres / communautés locales

land users, forest user, pasture users,

plan and provide field based knowledge on land use practices

organisations communautaires

village organization and different initiative groups with regards to land use

support with mobilizing communities for better planning of the land resource and motivate collaboration between different land users

Spécialistes de la GDT/ conseillers agricoles

land management, forest, pasture specialist from related department of government

support with providing technical knowledge and solving the current land use issues with applying/providing good practices

gouvernement local

sub-district and district level

facilitate the process of collaboration among different land users and make decision on future perspective of land use

3.2 Participation des exploitants locaux des terres/ communautés locales aux différentes phases de l'Approche

	Participation des exploitants locaux des terres/ communautés locales	Spécifiez qui était impliqué et décrivez les activités
initiation/ motivation	soutien extérieur	land users of different categories, including pasture users, forest user etc,. come together to discuss the future land use perspective and decide on organizing themselves in better management of their land resources
planification	interactive	all stakeholders involved and support different perspective of land use categories and jointly plan for the future land use
mise en œuvre	soutien extérieur	all stakeholders, involved in different land use categories negotiate and agree on terms and condition with regards complement the different land use importance.
suivi/ évaluation	passive	all stakeholders are passive in following the progress and results from land use intervention.

3.4 Prises de décision pour la sélection de la Technologie/ des Technologies

Indiquez qui a décidé de la sélection de la Technologie/ des Technologies à mettre en œuvre:

principalement les spécialistes de la GDT, après consultation des exploitants des terres

Expliquez:

the approach is introduced in the framework of the projects and only SLM specialists consult on the tools and approach how to plan

Spécifiez sur quelle base ont été prises les décisions:

l'évaluation de connaissances bien documentées en matière de GDT (prises de décision fondées sur des preuves tangibles)?

4. Soutien technique, renforcement des capacités et gestion des connaissances

4.1 Renforcement des capacités/ formation

Une formation a-t-elle été dispensée aux exploitants des terres/ autres parties prenantes?

Oui

Spécifiez qui a été formé:

exploitants des terres
personnels/ conseillers de terrain

Si pertinent, spécifiez le genre, l'âge, le statut, l'ethnie, etc.

training on soil assessment, land management and participatory land use planning and assessment

Formats de la formation:

sur le tas
réunions publiques

Thèmes abordés:

land degradation, soil assessment, land management

4.2 Service de conseils

Les exploitants des terres ont-ils accès à un service de conseils?

Non

4.3 Renforcement des institutions (développement organisationnel)

Des institutions ont elles été mises en place ou renforcées par le biais de l'Approche?

oui, un peu

Spécifiez à quel(s) niveau(x), ces institutions ont été renforcées ou mises en place:

local

Décrivez l'institution, ses rôles et responsabilités, ses membres, etc.

land use committee under the village organization as small entity dealing with land issues in the community only

Précisez le type de soutien:

renforcement des capacités/ formation

Donnez plus de détails:

land management, land degradation prevention

4.4 Suivi et évaluation

Le suivi et l'évaluation font ils partie de l'Approche? :

Non

4.5 Recherche

La recherche a-t-elle fait partie intégrante de l’Approche?

Non

5. Financement et soutien matériel externe

6. Analyses d'impact et conclusions

6.1 Impacts de l'Approche

Est-ce que l'Approche a autonomisé les exploitants locaux des terres, amélioré la participation des parties prenantes?

Non
Oui, un peu
Oui, modérément
Oui, beaucoup

the process follow by series of capacity building trainings, which are empowering community to get knowledge and understanding

Est-ce que l'Approche a permis la prise de décisions fondées sur des données probantes?

Non
Oui, un peu
Oui, modérément
Oui, beaucoup

as the approach involve participatory methods decision is made equally by all stockholders, including land users

Est-ce que l'Approche a aidé les exploitants des terres à mettre en œuvre et entretenir les Technologies de GDT?

Non
Oui, un peu
Oui, modérément
Oui, beaucoup

as a result of the approach action plan with implementing of technologies is involved

Est-ce que l'Approche a mobilisé/ amélioré l'accès aux ressources financières pour la mise en œuvre de la GDT?

Non
Oui, un peu
Oui, modérément
Oui, beaucoup

the approach results in a sophisticated document as plan and assessment report, which will then attracts funding for easy reference

Est-ce que l'Approche a atténué les conflits?

Non
Oui, un peu
Oui, modérément
Oui, beaucoup

the plan is mobilize communities and other stakeholder to collaborate and work together and negotiate and resolve emerging conflicts over resource

6.2 Principale motivation des exploitants des terres pour mettre en œuvre la GDT

augmenter la production

prevention of and application of technologies contribute to improvement of production

réduire la dégradation des terres

soil conservation techniques will be identified to apply for prevention of land degradation

6.3 Durabilité des activités de l'Approche

Les exploitants des terres peuvent-ils poursuivre ce qui a été mis en œuvre par le biais de l'Approche (sans soutien extérieur)?

incertain

Si non ou incertain, spécifiez et commentez:

community are only focused to get maximum economic benefit from land and therefore do not pay enough attention to support ecosystem services or environmental aspect of land conservation

6.4 Points forts/ avantages de l'Approche

Points forts/ avantages/ possibilités du point de vue de l'exploitant des terres
participatory
simply approach applied by community members themselve

Points forts/ avantages/ possibilités du point de vue du compilateur ou d'une autre personne ressource clé
provides visions, empowers land users to negotiate interventions among them, also raise awareness on the sustainability aspects of land use and provides more aspects on land conservation techniques for land term land use

6.5 Faiblesses/ inconvénients de l'Approche et moyens de les surmonter

Faiblesses/ inconvénients/ risques du point de vue de l’exploitant des terres	Comment peuvent-ils être surmontés?
time consuming, required a lot of facilitation	more awareness on communities knowledge about long term land use benefits. strengthen local legal framework to sustain and promote the planing process

Faiblesses/ inconvénients/ risques du point de vue du compilateur ou d'une autre personne ressource clé	Comment peuvent-ils être surmontés?
SLM knowledge and capacity	trainings for the local institutes involved in land use planing and management