1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的项目名称（如相关）

Soil and water protection (EU-SOWAP)

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称（如相关）

Catholic University of Leuven (KU Leuven) - 比利时

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

是

1.4 SLM技术问卷的参考

2.1 该方法的简要说明

Combination of 'dissemination of the SWC technology 'non-inversion tillage'' and research.

2.2 该方法的详细说明

该方法的详细说明:

Aims / objectives: To demonstrate the feasibility and stimulate the adaption of conservation tillage to the farmers.

Methods: (1) Collection of scientific data on farmer fields (yield and sediment production) and (2)intensive communication and discussion with farmers. Farmers are involved in the early stages of the project: also the local government and SWC specialists are target groups.

Stages of implementation: The project ( & approach) started in 2001. Every year, data is gathered at +- 15 fields of 10 farmers. The majority of the farmers have a positive attitude towards the approach. There is cooperation with other projects and with research institutes in the U.K. and Hungary. (They are working on the same project).

Other important information: Several times a year the information is communicated to other farmers through field visits and media.

2.3 该方法的照片

2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点

2.6 该方法的开始和终止日期

2.7 方法的类型

• 基于项目/方案

2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标

The Approach focused on SLM only

to overcome the problems listed in QA2.1.3.3 and to demonstrate (see question 2.1.1.2)

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: Insufficient knwoledge on the SWC technology and their impact on ecology and economy.

2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件

3.1 该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责

3.2 当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段

	当地土地使用者/当地社区的参与	指定参与人员并描述活动
启动/动机	无	workshops/seminars; The aims and planning of the project were discussed with a small group of farmers.
计划	无	workshops/seminars; idem
实施	无	responsibility for major steps; Farmers were implementing the new SCW technology with advice from researchers.
监测/评估	无	public meetings; Pro's and contra's of the technology is duscussed with farmers.
Research	无	Farmers are informed about the obtained research results.

3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策

具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:

• 主要是土地使用者，由SLM专家提供支持

解释:

Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by mainly by land users supported by SLM specialists

4.1 能力建设/培训

是否为土地使用者/其他利益相关者提供培训？:

是

明确受训人员:

• 土地使用者

• SWC specialists, planners

培训形式:

• 在职
• 农民对农民
• 示范区域
• 公开会议

涵盖的主题:

problems of soil erosion - practical issues about new technology.

4.2 咨询服务

土地使用者有权使用咨询服务吗？:

是

4.3 机构强化（组织发展）

是否通过这种方法建立或加强了机构？:

• 否

4.4 监测和评估

监测和评估是该方法的一部分吗？:

是

注释:

bio-physical aspects were regular monitored through measurements

technical aspects were ad hoc monitored through observations

economic / production aspects were regular monitored through measurements; indicators

no. of land users involved aspects were ad hoc monitored through measurements

There were no changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation

4.5 研究

研究是该方法的一部分吗?

是

明确话题:

• 经济/市场营销
• 生态学

提供进一步的细节，并指出是谁做的研究:

Collection of scientific data on farmer yields (yield and sediment production). This information is afterwards communicated to the farmers.

Research was carried out on-farm

5.1 该方法中SLM组成部分的年度预算

注释（例如主要的资助来源/主要捐助者）:

Approach costs were met by the following donors: international (EU-LIFE): 50.0%; other (SYNGENTA): 50.0%

5.3 对特定投入的补贴（包括劳动力）

• 无

如果土地使用者的劳动力是一项重要的投入，那么是不是:

• 以现金支付

注释:

Farmers were asked to split up a field: one part was conventional tilled and on the other part the SWC technology was applied. Farmers were paid for the extra work of splitting a field.

5.4 信用

是否根据SLM活动的方法给予信用值？:

否

6.1 方法的影响

6.3 方法活动的可持续性

土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施（无外部支持的情况下）？:

• 是

6.4 该方法的长处/优点

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
The combination of scientific research and direct interaction with farmers is a promising strategy to stimulate the adoption of conservation tillage.

7.1 方法/信息来源

7.2 参考可用出版物

标题、作者、年份、ISBN:

SOWAP - project 2003-2006

可以从哪里获得?成本如何?

www.sowap.org