方法

Introduction of conservation agriculture in a highly mechanised agricultural system [比利时]

  • 创建:
  • 更新:
  • 编制者:
  • 编辑者:
  • 审查者:

approaches_2556 - 比利时

完整性: 81%

1. 一般信息

1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

关键资源人员

SLM专业人员:

Gillijns Katleen

Cath. University Leuven

Oude Markt 13, 3000 Leuven

比利时

SLM专业人员:

Govers Gerard

gerard.govers@ees.kuleuven.be

Cath. University Leuven

比利时

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的项目名称(如相关)
Soil and water protection (EU-SOWAP)
有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称(如相关)
Catholic University of Leuven (KU Leuven) - 比利时

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

1.4 SLM技术问卷的参考

2. SLM方法的描述

2.1 该方法的简要说明

Combination of 'dissemination of the SWC technology 'non-inversion tillage'' and research.

2.2 该方法的详细说明

该方法的详细说明:

Aims / objectives: To demonstrate the feasibility and stimulate the adaption of conservation tillage to the farmers.

Methods: (1) Collection of scientific data on farmer fields (yield and sediment production) and (2)intensive communication and discussion with farmers. Farmers are involved in the early stages of the project: also the local government and SWC specialists are target groups.

Stages of implementation: The project ( & approach) started in 2001. Every year, data is gathered at +- 15 fields of 10 farmers. The majority of the farmers have a positive attitude towards the approach. There is cooperation with other projects and with research institutes in the U.K. and Hungary. (They are working on the same project).

Other important information: Several times a year the information is communicated to other farmers through field visits and media.

2.3 该方法的照片

2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点

国家:

比利时

有关地点的进一步说明:

Flanders

2.6 该方法的开始和终止日期

注明开始年份:

2001

终止年份(若不再采用该方法):

2006

2.7 方法的类型

  • 基于项目/方案

2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标

The Approach focused on SLM only

to overcome the problems listed in QA2.1.3.3 and to demonstrate (see question 2.1.1.2)

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: Insufficient knwoledge on the SWC technology and their impact on ecology and economy.

2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件

社会/文化/宗教规范和价值观
  • 阻碍

fields are not 'clean', lack of knowledge of the technology

Treatment through the SLM Approach: demonstrating the benefits of the SWC technology

财务资源和服务的可用性/可得性
  • 阻碍

benefits can only be seen in the long term, farmers are afraid that the yields will be less

Treatment through the SLM Approach: making a cost-benefit analysis, sharing the risk with the farmer

了解SLM,获得技术支持
  • 阻碍

for some operations special machinery is needed

Treatment through the SLM Approach: working together with other farmers with agricultural contractors

3. 相关利益相关者的参与和角色

3.1 该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责

  • 当地土地使用者/当地社区

Working land users were mainly men (Most of the farmers in Belgium are men.)

  • SLM专家/农业顾问
  • 研究人员
3.2 当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段
当地土地使用者/当地社区的参与 指定参与人员并描述活动
启动/动机 workshops/seminars; The aims and planning of the project were discussed with a small group of farmers.
计划 workshops/seminars; idem
实施 responsibility for major steps; Farmers were implementing the new SCW technology with advice from researchers.
监测/评估 public meetings; Pro's and contra's of the technology is duscussed with farmers.
Research Farmers are informed about the obtained research results.

3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策

具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:
  • 主要是土地使用者,由SLM专家提供支持
解释:

Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by mainly by land users supported by SLM specialists

4. 技术支持、能力建设和知识管理

4.1 能力建设/培训

是否为土地使用者/其他利益相关者提供培训?:

明确受训人员:
  • 土地使用者
  • SWC specialists, planners
培训形式:
  • 在职
  • 农民对农民
  • 示范区域
  • 公开会议
涵盖的主题:

problems of soil erosion - practical issues about new technology.

4.2 咨询服务

土地使用者有权使用咨询服务吗?:

4.3 机构强化(组织发展)

是否通过这种方法建立或加强了机构?:

4.4 监测和评估

监测和评估是该方法的一部分吗?:

注释:

bio-physical aspects were regular monitored through measurements

technical aspects were ad hoc monitored through observations

economic / production aspects were regular monitored through measurements; indicators

no. of land users involved aspects were ad hoc monitored through measurements

There were no changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation

4.5 研究

研究是该方法的一部分吗?

明确话题:
  • 经济/市场营销
  • 生态学
提供进一步的细节,并指出是谁做的研究:

Collection of scientific data on farmer yields (yield and sediment production). This information is afterwards communicated to the farmers.

Research was carried out on-farm

5. 融资和外部物质支持

5.1 该方法中SLM组成部分的年度预算

注释(例如主要的资助来源/主要捐助者):

Approach costs were met by the following donors: international (EU-LIFE): 50.0%; other (SYNGENTA): 50.0%

5.3 对特定投入的补贴(包括劳动力)

 
如果土地使用者的劳动力是一项重要的投入,那么是不是:
  • 以现金支付
注释:

Farmers were asked to split up a field: one part was conventional tilled and on the other part the SWC technology was applied. Farmers were paid for the extra work of splitting a field.

5.4 信用

是否根据SLM活动的方法给予信用值?:

6. 影响分析和结论性陈述

6.1 方法的影响

该方法是否帮助土地使用者实施和维护SLM技术?:
  • 是,很少
  • 是,中等
  • 是,支持力度很大

Less soil is eroded through implementation of the QT.

There are no strong land use rights.

Did other land users / projects adopt the Approach?
  • 是,很少
  • 是,中等
  • 是,支持力度很大

Some other projects in Belgium were setup with the same approach.

6.3 方法活动的可持续性

土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施(无外部支持的情况下)?:

6.4 该方法的长处/优点

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
The combination of scientific research and direct interaction with farmers is a promising strategy to stimulate the adoption of conservation tillage.

7. 参考和链接

7.1 方法/信息来源

  • 实地考察、实地调查
  • 与土地使用者的访谈

7.2 参考可用出版物

标题、作者、年份、ISBN:

SOWAP - project 2003-2006

可以从哪里获得?成本如何?

www.sowap.org

模块