1.2 参与该技术评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

有助于对技术进行记录/评估的项目名称（如相关）

Decision Support for Mainstreaming and Scaling out Sustainable Land Management (GEF-FAO / DS-SLM)

有助于对技术进行记录/评估的机构名称（如相关）

Integrated Catchment Management Project (Integrated Catchment Management Project) - 莱索托

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

是

1.4 所述技术的可持续性声明

这里所描述的技术在土地退化方面是否存在问题，导致无法被认为是一种可持续的土地管理技术？:

否

注释:

This technology is environmentally sustainable

1.5 参考关于SLM方法（使用WOCAT记录的SLM方法）的调查问卷

2.1 技术简介

技术定义:

The technology requires removal of invaders as resources for layering. The technology enhances accumulation of silt and moisture storage in dry-lands due to increased organic matter content in the soil from the brush.

2.2 技术的详细说明

说明:

DESCRIPTION OF TECHNOLOGY
1. It is applied on bare lands
2. Flowering stages of invaders should be taken into consideration before layering
3. functions; silt trap, moisture retention, as a factor of soil formation and medium for plant growth
4. Locally available materials such as invasive species
5. Improves land cover, land productivity and soil organic carbon
6. To land users, the technology is easy to implement and it has higher chances of reclaiming the marginal land. However, most of invasive species are used as source of fuel by the rural communities for cooking and heating in households. Many rural communities do not have electricity, gas or firewood as a source of fuel. Whenever people come across a heap of these invasive species, they vandalize it.

2.3 技术照片

2.4 技术视频

2.5 已应用该技术的、本评估所涵盖的国家/地区/地点

2.6 实施日期

注明实施年份:

2019

2.7 技术介绍

详细说明该技术是如何引入的:

• 通过项目/外部干预

注释（项目类型等）:

The technology was advocated to the community during scaling out of DS-SLM project

3.1 该技术的主要目的

• 改良生产
• 减少、预防、恢复土地退化
• 保护生态系统
• 结合其他技术保护流域/下游区域
• 保持/提高生物多样性

3.2 应用该技术的当前土地利用类型

同一土地单元内混合使用的土地：:

否

注释:

more than 80% of the area is range-land. The area forms part of the upper catchment for the Katse dam (LHDA)

3.3 由于技术的实施，土地使用是否发生了变化？

由于技术的实施，土地使用是否发生了变化？:

• 否（继续问题3.4）

3.4 供水

该技术所应用土地的供水:

• 雨养

注释:

The technology is implemented on the range-land

3.5 该技术所属的SLM组

• 农畜综合管理

3.6 包含该技术的可持续土地管理措施

注释:

The technology improves acreage and range-land health

3.7 该技术强调的主要土地退化类型

注释:

Improves land cover quality and productivity

3.8 防止、减少或恢复土地退化

具体数量名该技术与土地退化有关的目标:

• 减少土地退化
• 修复/恢复严重退化的土地

注释:

It is very effective as a means to control land degradation - LDN indicators; Land cover, Land productivity and Soil organic carbon can be achieved through this technology

4.1 该技术的技术图纸

4.2 有关投入和成本计算的一般信息

具体说明成本和投入是如何计算的:

• 每个技术区域

具体说明成本计算所用货币:

• 美元

4.3 技术建立活动

	活动	时间（季度）
1.	public gathering	Any
2.	brush control	before flowering
3.	brush layering	Any

注释:

The brush is uprooted then put as it is onto the bare soil, the rest is done is done by insects and micro-organisms
It is important to consider flowering season of invaders in order to avoid anthropogenic dispersal of seeds

4.4 技术建立所需要的费用和投入

	对投入进行具体说明	单位	数量	单位成本	每项投入的总成本	土地使用者承担的成本%
劳动力		person-days	1.0	5.0	5.0	5.0
设备	muttock	piece	1.0	16.0	16.0
技术建立所需总成本					21.0
技术建立总成本，美元					21.0

如果您无法分解上表中的成本，请估算建立该技术所需要的总成本。:

21.0

如果土地使用者负担的费用少于100%，请注明由谁负担其余费用:

Government

注释:

This technology is free, nothing is procured in order to implement it. The communities alone do implement by themselves.
With or without government funds, the activity can still be implemented

4.5 维护/经常性活动

	活动	时间/频率
1.	N/A	N/A

注释:

One way to maintain this technology is re-layering where the first attempt was not successful.
Periodic visits required in order to check re-growth of invaders as well as expected species

4.6 维护/经常性活动所需要的费用和投入（每年）

	对投入进行具体说明	单位	数量	单位成本	每项投入的总成本	土地使用者承担的成本%
劳动力	N/A	N/A

如果土地使用者负担的费用少于100%，请注明由谁负担其余费用:

Government

注释:

The activity requires minimal effort and less funds to be performed although the yields are very high

4.7 影响成本的最重要因素

描述影响成本的最决定性因素:

The technology is a free one, anybody even a layman does implement it. Herders at cattle post do implement it. There are no costs incurred to implement it.
The implementation as well as maintenance are least cost effective

5.1 气候

5.2 地形

说明该技术是否专门应用于:

• 不相关

关于地形的注释和进一步规范:

It is easily implemented on gently to moderate slopes

5.3 土壤

如有可能，附上完整的土壤描述或具体说明可用的信息，例如土壤类型、土壤酸碱度、阳离子交换能力、氮、盐度等。:

Detailed soil depth, type and texture map could be found on https;//lesis.gov.ls

5.4 水资源可用性和质量

水的盐度有问题吗？:

否

该区域正在发生洪水吗？:

否

关于水质和水量的注释和进一步规范:

Water quality is attributed to good range-land management as the erosion is minimal as well as parent rock

5.5 生物多样性

关于生物多样性的注释和进一步规范:

Most areas still have good biodiversity especially where range-lands are rested

5.6 应用该技术的土地使用者的特征

说明土地使用者的其他有关特征:

The land users are very cooperative together with their local authorities in land management activities

5.7 应用该技术的土地使用者使用的平均土地面积

5.8 土地所有权、土地使用权和水使用权

土地所有权:

• 社区/村庄
• 个人，有命名

土地使用权:

• 自由进入（无组织）
• 社区（有组织）

用水权:

• 自由进入（无组织）
• 社区（有组织）

土地使用权是否基于传统的法律制度？:

是

注释:

In Lesotho, land is communally owned therefore, all land users have access to the communal land, no user rights are given, that is why there is common pool resources challenges. communities manage their resources by laying down regulations and bylaws.
Lesotho land tenure system supports communal ownership of land

5.9 进入服务和基础设施的通道

注释:

Unlike most highlands in Lesotho, this area is most privileged due to Lesotho Highlands Development Authority interventions

6.1 该技术的现场影响

社会经济效应

生产

社会文化影响

生态影响

土壤

生物多样性:植被、动物

减少气候和灾害风险

对现场影响的评估（测量）进行具体说明:

vegetation, water resources, soil quality and properties, livelihoods as well as land use assessments were done

6.2 该技术的场外影响已经显现

对场外影响（测量）的评估进行具体说明:

vegetation, water resources, soil quality and properties, livelihoods as well as land use assessments were done

6.3 技术对渐变气候以及与气候相关的极端情况/灾害的暴露和敏感性（土地使用者认为的极端情况/灾害）

其他气候相关的后果

其他气候相关的后果

	该技术是如何应对的？
Snow cover in some areas in the highlands	未知

注释:

Lesotho highlands receive much snow in winter and they are very cold and dry

6.4 成本效益分析

技术收益与技术建立成本相比如何（从土地使用者的角度看）？

技术收益与技术维护成本/经常性成本相比如何（从土地使用者的角度看）？

注释:

according to land users, the technology is easy to implement

6.5 技术采用

• 1-10%

如若可行，进行量化（住户数量和/或覆盖面积）:

40

在所有采用这项技术的人当中，有多少人是自发的，即未获得任何物质奖励/付款？:

• 0-10%

注释:

Livestock owners found the technology very easy to implement as against those who did not own any livestock

6.6 适应

最近是否对该技术进行了修改以适应不断变化的条件？:

否

6.7 该技术的优点/长处/机会

土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会
It requires no inputs
It needs less equipment
It does not need periodic monitoring and evaluation

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
It can be demonstrated to a lot of people at the same time
It is less time consuming
It can be implemented without government funds

6.8 技术的弱点/缺点/风险及其克服方法

土地使用者认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
Locally available material liable to vandalism	intensive extension

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
community participation	extension service enforcement

7.1 信息的方法/来源

7.2 参考可用出版物

标题、作者、年份、ISBN:

N/A

可以从哪里获得?成本如何?

N/A

7.3 链接到网络上的相关信息

标题/说明:

N/A

URL:

N/A

7.4 一般注释

Most information on this technology has been deduced from various studies and also learned through attendance of various land-scape management fora and excursions