Volunteer Soil Doctor Network: A Driving Force for Sustainable Land Development (Thailand) [Thailand]
- Creation:
- Update:
- Compiler: Kukiat SOITONG
- Editor: –
- Reviewers: Rima Mekdaschi Studer, Pitayakon Limtong, William Critchley
Mordin Arsa, Volunteer Soil Doctors
approaches_4245 - Thailand
View sections
Expand all Collapse all1. General information
1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Approach
Key resource person(s)
land user:
Chantasitha Suthat
17/2 Moo 3 Tambon Rampan Thamai District Chantaburi province
Thailand
land user:
Puempak Wanlop
15/5 Moo 3 Tambon Rampan Thamai District Chantaburi province
1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT
When were the data compiled (in the field)?
10/10/2018
The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:
Yes
2. Description of the SLM Approach
2.1 Short description of the Approach
The Volunteer Soil Doctors Network at Tam bon Ram Pan, Tamai District, Chantaburi province is a grouping of lead farmers who have been assigned to be "volunteer soil doctors", applying the new theoretical Agriculture and Sufficiency Economy Philosophy of His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej (Rama 9). Their adoption of the theory helps them to demonstrate its efficiency through management of their own small-scale farms.
2.2 Detailed description of the Approach
Detailed description of the Approach:
The volunteer soil doctors are the farmers who coordinate land development activities such as land suitability, land management, soil improvement, soil test services, including some activities of the Land Development Department. Currently, Thailand has more than 80,000 volunteer soil doctors living/ operating in villages, sub-districts, districts and provinces, covering the whole country. The Volunteer Soil Doctors Network is a grouping of the lead and volunteer farmers who have been assigned to work together as a network, support each other and assisting the Land Development Department to achieve its goals. They facilitate knowledge exchange, learning and supporting technology transfer to their communities. The nationwide network covers the village level, tambon or sub-district level, district and provincial level.
The Land Development Department selected and appointed 80,000 volunteer lead farmers in the village level, covering the whole country, to be volunteer soil doctors. The Land Development Department and those lead farmers select the chief of the volunteer soil doctors at the district level and the chiefs from all districts choose the representative in the provincial level. Chiefs of the volunteer soil doctors at various levels work together in a network pattern. A knowledge exchange forum for the volunteer soil doctors in each network hierarchy is set up. The network of volunteer soil doctors in each level provide information, news and public relations to their members. The Volunteer Soil Doctors Network provides extension, promotion and technology transfer to their communities. The Land Development Department provides training for volunteer soil doctors. Finally, the monitoring/ evaluation and reporting will be done by Land Development Department.
The stakeholders related to the Volunteer Soil Doctors Network are volunteer soil doctors who apply the New Theory of Agriculture and transfer the technology to farmers, school pupils, university students and anyone else interested. Farmers, school pupils, university students, general public and government officers may come to study and practice in the operating area. The Land Development Department and the Office of the Royal Development Projects Board support materials, publications and technical knowledge in the New Theory of Agriculture. The New Theory of Agriculture as applied by the Volunteer Soil Doctors Network focuses on the usage of organic materials, reducing the use of chemicals, to improve soil resources and environmental conditions. However, the limitation of the networking is the low adoption of the New Theory Agriculture because most farmers focus on profitability, while the New Theory Agriculture concept stresses sufficiency economy and self-reliance.
2.3 Photos of the Approach
2.4 Videos of the Approach
Comments, short description:
-
Date:
13/07/2016
Location:
47 Moo3 Tambon RAmpan Thamai District,Chantaburi province
Name of videographer:
LDD
2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Approach has been applied
Country:
Thailand
Region/ State/ Province:
Chantaburi province
Further specification of location:
47 Moo3 Tambon RAmpan Thamai District,Chantaburi province
Comments:
-
Map
×2.6 Dates of initiation and termination of the Approach
Indicate year of initiation:
2007
If precise year is not known, indicate approximate date when the Approach was initiated:
10-50 years ago
Comments:
-
2.7 Type of Approach
- project/ programme based
2.8 Main aims/ objectives of the Approach
The Volunteer Soil Doctors Network aims to be a forum among volunteer soil doctors and Land Development Department that work closely together to improve the land through the New Theory of Agriculture.
2.9 Conditions enabling or hindering implementation of the Technology/ Technologies applied under the Approach
social/ cultural/ religious norms and values
- enabling
Thai culture and religious norms are that people help each other and help the community as well.
availability/ access to financial resources and services
- enabling
There is availability of credits such as BAAC, Community Fund, Community Saving Group
- hindering
the credit loan condition is not meet to the farmers qualification ,it make limited to the credit.
institutional setting
- enabling
-
collaboration/ coordination of actors
- enabling
Various MoAC agencies integrate in working and supporting the promotion of the New Theory of Agriculture
legal framework (land tenure, land and water use rights)
- enabling
-
policies
- enabling
There have been 5 coordination projects to continue King Rama 9 initiatives. They are: to drive the project, technology transfer, support/ subsidize the inputs, public relations, and project monitoring & evaluation.
land governance (decision-making, implementation and enforcement)
- enabling
The New Theory of Agriculture is the efficient land use for small-scale farmers, the technology transfer will make more farmers to adopt, with more efficient land use
knowledge about SLM, access to technical support
- enabling
Land users gain knowledge on the New Theory Agriculture, sufficiency economy and be able to apply to their farms. Land Development Department supports well digging, on farm infrastructure development. Soil test services are provided through Volunteer Soil Doctors Network and Land development learning plot, Royal Projects Office and various agencies of MoAC support and promot the approach.
markets (to purchase inputs, sell products) and prices
- enabling
There has been a market for organic/ safe products and it attracts farmers to produce such things.
- hindering
Some crop prices have dropped as for example para rubber
workload, availability of manpower
- hindering
Shortage of farm labor ,high cost of labor .They need to use family member or labor pool
3. Participation and roles of stakeholders involved
3.1 Stakeholders involved in the Approach and their roles
- local land users/ local communities
farmers in the community
The New Theory of Agriculture knowledge has been transferred by training to the target farmers and they change their practice through the concept of the technology as they live with self-sufficiency economy concept, which makes them more self-reliant.
- SLM specialists/ agricultural advisers
Land Development Department, the Office of the Royal Development Projects
Land Development Department and the Office of the Royal Development Projects take the farmers to visit the New Theory Agriculture demonstration site, to learn and share experiences.
- researchers
Researchers from Land Development Department
Use the farmers’ field for the field trial to study: The use of organic acid from bio-fermented solution to replace the synthetic formic acid; Field trial on the use of vetiver grass for keeping moisture, fertility and reducing erosion in long-kong plantation; Soil acidity management for growing dragon fruit crops.
- teachers/ school children/ students
Burapha University students
Visit to practice and learn lessons and report.
- local government
Local government
Supports the center.
หน่วยงานทหาร เข้ามาศึกษาดูงาน
-
If several stakeholders were involved, indicate lead agency:
-
3.2 Involvement of local land users/ local communities in the different phases of the Approach
Involvement of local land users/ local communities | Specify who was involved and describe activities | |
---|---|---|
initiation/ motivation | interactive | Land Development Department selected and appointed volunteer lead farmers in the village level. The Department of Land Development and lead farmers who work as volunteer soil doctors in villages will select the chief in the district level. |
planning | interactive | Land Development Department sets up the Network of Volunteer Soil Doctors at the community or moo ban/ village level, to be a forum for knowledge exchange and technology transfer from soil doctors to other farmers. |
implementation | interactive | Land Development Department sets up the knowledge exchange forum for soil volunteer doctors in each network. The Network of Volunteer Soil Doctors in each level will provide information, news and public relation to their members. The Volunteer Soil Doctors Network will provide extension, promotion and technology transfer to their communities. Land Development Department will provide training programs for volunteer soil doctors |
monitoring/ evaluation | interactive | Land Development Department manages monitoring and evaluation. |
- |
3.3 Flow chart (if available)
Description:
-
Author:
-
3.4 Decision-making on the selection of SLM Technology/ Technologies
Specify who decided on the selection of the Technology/ Technologies to be implemented:
- mainly land users, supported by SLM specialists
Explain:
land users and network got the technology transfer and supported from LDD and the Office of the Royal Development Projects
Specify on what basis decisions were made:
- personal experience and opinions (undocumented)
- supported from Government agencies
4. Technical support, capacity building, and knowledge management
4.1 Capacity building/ training
Was training provided to land users/ other stakeholders?
Yes
Specify who was trained:
- land users
If relevant, specify gender, age, status, ethnicity, etc.
-
Form of training:
- on-the-job
- farmer-to-farmer
- public meetings
Subjects covered:
The New Theory of Agriculture curriculum consists of the King’s knowledge, The New Theory of Agriculture concept, the farm planning, the production planning, the cost reduction knowledge, the income generating knowledge and the household account.
Comments:
more knowledge of The New Theoretical Agriculture and the King knowledge
4.2 Advisory service
Do land users have access to an advisory service?
Yes
Specify whether advisory service is provided:
- on land users' fields
Describe/ comments:
Farmers interested in the New Theory of Agriculture could visit and learn at the center at the New Theory of Agriculture Demonstration Plot, taken care by Ms Mali Khanthira, Rampan Sub-district, Thamai District, Chathaburi Province, phone 065-6903985
4.3 Institution strengthening (organizational development)
Have institutions been established or strengthened through the Approach?
- no
4.4 Monitoring and evaluation
Is monitoring and evaluation part of the Approach?
Yes
Comments:
there are monitoring and evaluation program from the agencies under the MOAC
Comments:
-
4.5 Research
Was research part of the Approach?
No
5. Financing and external material support
5.1 Annual budget for the SLM component of the Approach
If precise annual budget is not known, indicate range:
- < 2,000
Comments (e.g. main sources of funding/ major donors):
The budget from the Land Development Department for training of each soil doctor is US$ 74 per head plus US$ 17 expenses. Training is delivered by farmers with experience or by agriculturalists from LDD.
5.2 Financial/ material support provided to land users
Did land users receive financial/ material support for implementing the Technology/ Technologies?
Yes
If yes, specify type(s) of support, conditions, and provider(s):
Land Development Department supports the implementation of the New Theory of Agriculture through the financial support and farm inputs.
5.3 Subsidies for specific inputs (including labour)
- agricultural
Specify which inputs were subsidised | To which extent | Specify subsidies |
---|---|---|
seeds | partly financed | 5,000 |
dolomite/marl | 50,800 | |
If labour by land users was a substantial input, was it:
- rewarded with other material support
Comments:
Land Development Department supported farm inputs such as marl /lime jack bean seed,Innoculants for compost making /bio fermented solution ,plot sign etc.
5.4 Credit
Was credit provided under the Approach for SLM activities?
Yes
Specify conditions (interest rate, payback, etc.):
-
Specify credit providers:
Credit providers: Community Fund, a saving group for production (member monthly saving 100 THB and they can get loan from that Fund)
Specify credit receivers:
Farmer group
5.5 Other incentives or instruments
Were other incentives or instruments used to promote implementation of SLM Technologies?
Yes
If yes, specify:
The New Theory learning point by volunteer soil doctors of Network
6. Impact analysis and concluding statements
6.1 Impacts of the Approach
Did the Approach empower local land users, improve stakeholder participation?
- No
- Yes, little
- Yes, moderately
- Yes, greatly
After applying the New Theory of Agriculture practice, farmers’ income increased (more types of crops and more farmer groups).
Did the Approach enable evidence-based decision-making?
- No
- Yes, little
- Yes, moderately
- Yes, greatly
Farmer changed cropping pattern from single crop to integrated crop production and moved forwards to self-reliance.
Did the Approach help land users to implement and maintain SLM Technologies?
- No
- Yes, little
- Yes, moderately
- Yes, greatly
The knowledge sharing to neighbour farmers made change to them.
Did the Approach improve coordination and cost-effective implementation of SLM?
- No
- Yes, little
- Yes, moderately
- Yes, greatly
The Soil Volunteer Doctors Network, farmers groups, crop processing group and knowledge sharing forum
Did the Approach mobilize/ improve access to financial resources for SLM implementation?
- No
- Yes, little
- Yes, moderately
- Yes, greatly
The networking made it easy to access finance/credit and community fund, with low interest for agricultural investment.
Did the Approach improve knowledge and capacities of land users to implement SLM?
- No
- Yes, little
- Yes, moderately
- Yes, greatly
Public sector provided the training program and technology transfer of the New Theory Agriculture to farmers.
Did the Approach improve knowledge and capacities of other stakeholders?
- No
- Yes, little
- Yes, moderately
- Yes, greatly
Public sector provided the training program and technology transfer of the New Theory Agriculture to farmers.
Did the Approach encourage young people/ the next generation of land users to engage in SLM?
- No
- Yes, little
- Yes, moderately
- Yes, greatly
There has been a media distribution on the New Theory of Agriculture such as TV and radio program, which has made new generation farmers to know the principle of the New Theory Agriculture and adopted.
Did the Approach lead to improved food security/ improved nutrition?
- No
- Yes, little
- Yes, moderately
- Yes, greatly
The products of New Theory Agriculture have been organic products and safe products.
Did the Approach improve access to markets?
- No
- Yes, little
- Yes, moderately
- Yes, greatly
Various safe farm products meet the market demand.
6.2 Main motivation of land users to implement SLM
- increased production
more type of crop production pattern
- increased profit(ability), improved cost-benefit-ratio
more circulate income,farmer have the sufficient economy life.
- reduced land degradation
the products from the new theoretical agriculture are organic products ,restore land degradation
- affiliation to movement/ project/ group/ networks
strengthen the Soil Volunteer Doctor Network
- enhanced SLM knowledge and skills
regularly Practice and field visiting
6.3 Sustainability of Approach activities
Can the land users sustain what has been implemented through the Approach (without external support)?
- yes
If yes, describe how:
The Volunteer Soil Doctors Network applied the concept of New Theory of Agriculture to their farm, made them more self-reliant by using their own family member power, have the sufficient economy life, and convey the knowledge/ technology to their neighbouring farmers.
6.4 Strengths/ advantages of the Approach
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the land user’s view |
---|
Farmers have better living standard and are self-reliant. |
Government sector supported the implementation of the New Theory of Agriculture approach and the promotion of the Volunteer Soil Doctors Network. |
Farmers unity, love and strength are effected by farmer grouping |
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view |
---|
Government agencies are key organizations that support and promote the New Theory Agriculture. |
The New Theory of Agriculture focuses on the production of safe products, organic substance, and make use of recycled farm wastes as compost and bio-fermented solution, which helps reduce the cost of production. |
6.5 Weaknesses/ disadvantages of the Approach and ways of overcoming them
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the land user’s view | How can they be overcome? |
---|---|
Shortage of labour, costly labour | Household labour or farm machinery |
Lack of crop production knowledge | Explore more knowledge |
Insufficient water resources for farming | Increase more capacity to keep more water longer, such as dig more wells or search for underground water, dredge the natural canals, pump the water and keep in the farm. |
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view | How can they be overcome? |
---|---|
The limitation of the networking is the low adoption of the New Theory of Agriculture because most farmers’ attitude focuses on the profits, while the New Theory of Agriculture concept focuses on sufficiency economy and self-reliance. | Awareness raising, campaign for the New Theory Agriculture concept which focuses on sufficiency economy and self-reliance. |
7. References and links
7.1 Methods/ sources of information
- field visits, field surveys
-
- interviews with land users
5
- interviews with SLM specialists/ experts
1
7.2 References to available publications
Title, author, year, ISBN:
-
Available from where? Costs?
-
7.3 Links to relevant information which is available online
Title/ description:
-
URL:
-
Links and modules
Expand all Collapse allLinks
No links
Modules
No modules